• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有血小板减少症的非心源性缺血性卒中抗血小板治疗的安全性:CASE II 研究。

Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke With Thrombocytopenia: The CASE II Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology Dongyang Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Dongyang China.

Department of Neurology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e032327. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032327. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.032327
PMID:39119972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11963942/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is scant evidence regarding the safety of antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with thrombocytopenia. Our study aims to address this concern by examining AIS patients with thrombocytopenia from a large database in real-world settings.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included patients with AIS with a platelet count <100×10/L who had complete records of antiplatelet drug use. Those requiring anticoagulation or having contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. A good clinical outcome was defined as functional independence, indicated by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at discharge. Propensity score matched analyses were used. We screened 169 423 patients with AIS from 90 stroke centers in the CASE II register, ultimately enrolling 2808 noncardioembolic patients with thrombocytopenia. In the propensity score matched analyses, no significant difference was observed between the antiplatelet and nonantiplatelet groups in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio=0.855 [95% CI, 0.284-5.478]; =0.160) or gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio=2.034 [95% CI, 0.755-5.478]; =0.160). Antiplatelet therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes at discharge (odds ratio=1.405 [95% CI, 1.028-1.920]; =0.033), and showed a trend towards reducing 1-year mortality (odds ratio=0.395 [95% CI, 0.152-1.031]; =0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antiplatelet therapy lessened as platelet count decreased in patients with AIS with thrombocytopenia. However, our findings suggest that antiplatelet medications remain safe and effective for this population.

摘要

背景

血小板减少症的急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者抗血小板治疗的安全性证据甚少。我们的研究旨在通过检查真实环境中来自大型数据库的 AIS 伴血小板减少症患者来解决这一问题。

方法和结果

我们纳入了血小板计数<100×10/L 且有完整抗血小板药物使用记录的 AIS 患者。排除需要抗凝或有抗血小板治疗禁忌证的患者。短期安全性结局为住院期间出血事件,长期安全性结局为 1 年全因死亡率。良好的临床结局定义为功能独立性,出院时改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0 至 2 分。采用倾向评分匹配分析。我们从 CASE II 登记处的 90 个卒中中心筛选了 169423 例 AIS 患者,最终纳入了 2808 例非心源性栓塞性血小板减少症患者。在倾向评分匹配分析中,抗血小板组和非抗血小板组的颅内出血(比值比=0.855 [95%CI,0.284-5.478];=0.160)或胃肠道出血(比值比=2.034 [95%CI,0.755-5.478];=0.160)发生率无显著差异。抗血小板治疗与出院时功能结局改善相关(比值比=1.405 [95%CI,1.028-1.920];=0.033),并显示出降低 1 年死亡率的趋势(比值比=0.395 [95%CI,0.152-1.031];=0.058)。

结论

随着 AIS 伴血小板减少症患者血小板计数的降低,抗血小板治疗的应用减少。然而,我们的研究结果表明,抗血小板药物对这一人群仍然是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/0111117c303f/JAH3-13-e032327-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/51a6373c7064/JAH3-13-e032327-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/01d97c872ff7/JAH3-13-e032327-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/0111117c303f/JAH3-13-e032327-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/51a6373c7064/JAH3-13-e032327-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/01d97c872ff7/JAH3-13-e032327-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d217/11963942/0111117c303f/JAH3-13-e032327-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke With Thrombocytopenia: The CASE II Study.伴有血小板减少症的非心源性缺血性卒中抗血小板治疗的安全性:CASE II 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e032327. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032327. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.非心源性轻度卒中伴血小板减少症患者早期抗血小板治疗的安全性。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Apr 25;53(2):175-183. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423.
3
Exploring Sex Differences in Outcomes of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients With Noncardioembolic Mild-to-Moderate Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the READAPT Study Cohort.探索非心源性轻至中度缺血性卒中或高危短暂性脑缺血发作患者双重抗血小板治疗结局的性别差异:READAPT研究队列的倾向评分匹配分析
Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):305-317. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049210. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
4
Combining Intravenous Thrombolysis and Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the READAPT Study Cohort.联合静脉溶栓和双联抗血小板治疗对轻型缺血性卒中患者的影响:READAPT 研究队列的倾向性匹配分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e036275. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036275. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
5
Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: A propensity matched analysis.非心源性轻至中度缺血性卒中患者双联与单联抗血小板治疗的真实世界比较:一项倾向匹配分析。
Int J Stroke. 2025 Apr;20(4):438-449. doi: 10.1177/17474930241302991. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
6
Safety and functional outcomes of early antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours following mechanical thrombectomy for secondary prevention in emergent large-vessel occlusion strokes: a registry study.机械取栓后 24 小时内早期抗血小板治疗对急诊大血管闭塞性卒中二级预防的安全性和功能结局:一项登记研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E19. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23335.
7
Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.静脉溶栓后轻型缺血性卒中患者的早期双联抗血小板治疗。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Oct;33(10):107903. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107903. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Antiplatelet Strategies and Outcomes in Patients with Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke from a Real-World Study with a Five-Year Follow-Up.真实世界研究随访 5 年:伴有非心源性缺血性脑卒中患者的抗血小板策略与结局。
Transl Stroke Res. 2017 Jun;8(3):228-233. doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0516-0. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
10
Contemporary Prestroke Dual Antiplatelet Use and Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk After Thrombolysis.当代溶栓治疗前双联抗血小板治疗与症状性脑出血风险
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jul 1;81(7):722-731. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1312.

引用本文的文献

1
Progression From Early Multiterritorial Punctate Infarcts to Massive Stroke in Fulminant Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Despite Aggressive Therapy: A Therapeutic Dilemma in Initiating Antithrombotic Therapy.尽管积极治疗,暴发性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜仍从早期多部位点状梗死进展为大面积卒中:抗栓治疗起始中的治疗困境
Cureus. 2025 Jul 18;17(7):e88250. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88250. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Machine learning derived model for the prediction of bleeding in dual antiplatelet therapy patients.用于预测双联抗血小板治疗患者出血情况的机器学习衍生模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 2;11:1402672. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1402672. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on pharmacological interventions for long-term secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)关于缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后长期二级预防的药物干预指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2022 Sep;7(3):I-II. doi: 10.1177/23969873221100032. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Long-term effects of baseline on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠脉综合征伴血小板减少症行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的基线治疗血小板反应性的长期影响。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221081725. doi: 10.1177/03000605221081725.
3
Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests.
利用机器学习模型随机森林预测缺血性脑卒中的大血管闭塞。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022 Apr;7(2):94-100. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001096. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《2021年卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会指南》
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-e467. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Cerebral Infarction With Thrombocytopenia.脑梗死伴血小板减少症患者抗血小板治疗的长期安全性和疗效。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:1076029620980067. doi: 10.1177/1076029620980067.
6
Dual anti-platelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in a population of patients with thrombocytopenia at baseline: a meta-analysis.基线时存在血小板减少症的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40360-020-00409-2.
7
Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia.更新的原发性免疫性血小板减少症的调查和管理国际共识报告。
Blood Adv. 2019 Nov 26;3(22):3780-3817. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000812.
8
Increased platelet count and reticulated platelets in recently symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and in cerebral microembolic signal-negative patient subgroups: results from the HaEmostasis In carotid STenosis (HEIST) study.近期有症状 versus 无症状颈动脉狭窄患者亚组及脑微栓子信号阴性患者亚组的血小板计数和网织血小板增加:来自 HaEmostasis In carotid STenosis(HEIST)研究的结果。
J Neurol. 2018 May;265(5):1037-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8797-8. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Thrombotic Paradox: Ischaemic Stroke in Immune Thrombocytopaenia. A Case Report and Review.血栓形成悖论:免疫性血小板减少症患者的缺血性中风。病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2017 Dec 3;9(12):e1904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1904.
10
The management of antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients with thrombocytopenia: a clinical conundrum.血小板减少的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的管理:一个临床难题。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 14;38(47):3488-3492. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx531.