Suppr超能文献

荷兰队列研究中的疼痛敏感性的性别差异:横断面和基于网络的多维研究。

Sex Differences in Pain Sensitivity in a Dutch Cohort: Cross-Sectional and Web-Based Multidimensional Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 9;26:e53926. doi: 10.2196/53926.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex is an important factor influencing the development and treatment of chronic pain, but the extent of its influence is still unclear. Other demographic factors as well as nonpharmacological interventions might influence pain sensitivity differently in men and women.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of sex and other demographic, lifestyle, behavioral, clinical, and environmental factors on pain sensitivity in the Dutch population. Different films were used to investigate how they would impact pain sensitivity and what influence sex and other variables have on the effect of this simple intervention.

METHODS

We performed a study consisting of 2 parts: (1) a cross-sectional research to investigate pain sensitivity differences between men and women and the influence of other demographic variables on the pain sensitivity in a Dutch cohort and (2) an internet intervention study to determine whether a short film could skew pain sensitivity.

RESULTS

All respondents filled in a web-based demographic questionnaire and were randomized into 4 groups. The control group filled in the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire without watching a preliminary film. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in the control group (n=1746). The other 3 groups watched short films: one group watched a film with scenes of nature (n=2650), another group watched a film on laughing people (n=2735), and the last group watched a film on physically painful events (n=2708). Immediately after the film viewing, participants were directed to the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire to measure their pain sensitivity. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score was stated as a mean per question on the numeric rating scale from 0-1. The cross-sectional study revealed no significant differences between men and women but showed male-female differences in the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire when specific background factors were present. Watching a short film had a positive impact on the pain sensitivity of the respondents who had chronic pain, with a higher effect observed in female respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientists performing pain research need to account for factors that can influence the outcome of their study and be aware that these factors can be sex-dependent, and pain sensitivity should be analyzed accordingly. Even relatively small interventions such as watching a film can impact pain sensitivity, especially in respondents with current chronic pain. This effect can vary as well when different background factors are present. Our findings warrant further explorations of the possibilities that simple interventions bring for patients in personalized medicine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Landelijk Trial Register NTR-new NL8182; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/29537.

摘要

背景

性别是影响慢性疼痛发展和治疗的一个重要因素,但它的影响程度仍不清楚。其他人口统计学因素以及非药物干预措施可能会对男性和女性的疼痛敏感性产生不同的影响。

目的

在这项研究中,我们旨在调查性别以及其他人口统计学、生活方式、行为、临床和环境因素对荷兰人群疼痛敏感性的影响。使用不同的电影来研究它们如何影响疼痛敏感性,以及性别和其他变量对这种简单干预的效果有何影响。

方法

我们进行了一项由两部分组成的研究:(1)一项横断面研究,旨在调查男性和女性之间的疼痛敏感性差异,以及其他人口统计学变量对荷兰队列中疼痛敏感性的影响;(2)一项互联网干预研究,以确定一部短片是否会影响疼痛敏感性。

结果

所有受访者都填写了一份基于网络的人口统计学问卷,并被随机分为 4 组。对照组在观看初步电影前填写疼痛敏感性问卷。在对照组中进行了一项横断面分析(n=1746)。其余 3 组观看了短片:一组观看了自然场景的电影(n=2650),另一组观看了关于欢笑的电影(n=2735),最后一组观看了关于身体疼痛事件的电影(n=2708)。观看完电影后,参与者立即被引导至疼痛敏感性问卷,以测量他们的疼痛敏感性。疼痛敏感性问卷的评分以数字评定量表上的均值表示,范围为 0-1。横断面研究显示,男性和女性之间没有显著差异,但当存在特定的背景因素时,疼痛敏感性问卷显示出男性和女性之间的差异。观看短片对患有慢性疼痛的受访者的疼痛敏感性产生了积极影响,女性受访者的影响更大。

结论

从事疼痛研究的科学家需要考虑可能影响研究结果的因素,并意识到这些因素可能与性别有关,因此需要相应地分析疼痛敏感性。即使是像观看电影这样相对较小的干预措施也会影响疼痛敏感性,尤其是在有当前慢性疼痛的受访者中。当存在不同的背景因素时,这种影响也会有所不同。我们的发现证明了简单干预措施为个性化医学中的患者带来的可能性值得进一步探索。

试验注册

荷兰国家临床试验注册库 NTR-new NL8182;https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/29537.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a6/11344183/37401b755c7a/jmir_v26i1e53926_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验