Li Zhou, Sun Xingrong, Pan Jie, Wang Tao, Li Yuan, Li Xiuting, Hou Shuai
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction in the Plateau Mountainous Region, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;13(15):2084. doi: 10.3390/plants13152084.
The combination of no-till farming and green manure is key to nourishing the soil and increasing crop yields. However, it remains unclear how to enhance the efficiency of green manure under no-till conditions. We conducted a two-factor field trial of silage maize rotated with hairy vetch to test the effects of tillage methods and returning. Factor 1 is the type of tillage, which is divided into conventional ploughing and no-tillage; factor 2 is the different ways of returning hairy vetch as green manure, which were also compared: no return (NM), stubble return (H), mulching (HM), turnover (HR, for CT only), and live coverage (LM, for NT only). Our findings indicate that different methods of returning hairy vetch to the field will improve maize yield and quality. The best results were obtained in CT and NT in HM and LM, respectively. Specifically, HM resulted in the highest dry matter quality and yield, with improvements of 35.4% and 31.9% over NM under CT, respectively. It also demonstrated the best economic and net energy performance. However, other treatments had no significant effect on the beneficial utilization and return of nutrients. The LM improved yields under NT by boosting soil enzyme activity, promoting nitrogen transformation and accumulation, and increasing nitrogen use efficiency for better kernel development. Overall, NTLM is best at utilizing and distributing soil nutrients and increasing silage maize yield. This finding supports the eco-efficient cultivation approach in silage maize production in the region.
免耕种植与绿肥相结合是滋养土壤和提高作物产量的关键。然而,尚不清楚如何在免耕条件下提高绿肥的效率。我们进行了一项青贮玉米与毛苕子轮作的两因素田间试验,以测试耕作方式和还田方式的效果。因素1是耕作类型,分为传统翻耕和免耕;因素2是毛苕子作为绿肥的不同还田方式,也进行了比较:不还田(NM)、留茬还田(H)、覆盖还田(HM)、翻埋还田(HR,仅适用于传统翻耕)和活体覆盖还田(LM,仅适用于免耕)。我们的研究结果表明,毛苕子不同的田间还田方式会提高玉米产量和品质。在传统翻耕和免耕条件下,分别以覆盖还田和活体覆盖还田效果最佳。具体而言,覆盖还田的干物质质量和产量最高,在传统翻耕条件下分别比不还田提高了35.4%和31.9%。它还表现出最佳的经济和净能量性能。然而,其他处理对养分的有益利用和归还没有显著影响。活体覆盖还田通过提高土壤酶活性、促进氮素转化和积累以及提高氮素利用效率,促进籽粒发育,从而提高了免耕条件下的产量。总体而言,免耕活体覆盖还田在土壤养分利用和分配以及提高青贮玉米产量方面表现最佳。这一发现支持了该地区青贮玉米生产中的生态高效种植方式。