Suppr超能文献

损失框架下冲动性个体差异的计算和神经基础。

The computational and neural substrates of individual differences in impulsivity under loss framework.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.

Epilepsy Center, Tsinghua University Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 1;45(11):e26808. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26808.

Abstract

Numerous neuroimaging studies have identified significant individual variability in intertemporal choice, often attributed to three neural mechanisms: (1) increased reward circuit activity, (2) decreased cognitive control, and (3) prospection ability. These mechanisms that explain impulsivity, however, have been primarily studied in the gain domain. This study extends this investigation to the loss domain. We employed a hierarchical Bayesian drift-diffusion model (DDM) and the inter-subject representational similarity approach (IS-RSA) to investigate the potential computational neural substrates underlying impulsivity in loss domain across two experiments (n = 155). These experiments utilized a revised intertemporal task that independently manipulated the amounts of immediate and delayed-loss options. Behavioral results demonstrated positive correlations between the drift rate, measured by the DDM, and the impulsivity index K in Exp. 1 (n = 97) and were replicated in Exp. 2 (n = 58). Imaging analyses further revealed that the drift rate significantly mediated the relations between brain properties (e.g., prefrontal cortex activations and gray matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and precuneus) and K in Exp. 1. IS-RSA analyses indicated that variability in the drift rate also mediated the associations between inter-subject variations in activation patterns and individual differences in K. These findings suggest that individuals with similar impulsivity levels are likely to exhibit similar value processing patterns, providing a potential explanation for individual differences in impulsivity within a loss framework.

摘要

许多神经影像学研究已经确定了跨期选择中存在显著的个体差异,这些差异通常归因于三种神经机制:(1)奖励回路活动增加,(2)认知控制降低,和(3)前瞻性能力。然而,这些解释冲动性的机制主要在获得领域进行了研究。本研究将这一调查扩展到了损失领域。我们采用了分层贝叶斯漂移-扩散模型(DDM)和跨主体代表性相似性方法(IS-RSA),在两个实验(n=155)中研究了损失领域中冲动性的潜在计算神经基础。这些实验使用了一个经过修改的跨期任务,该任务独立地操纵了即时和延迟损失选项的数量。行为结果表明,DDM 测量的漂移率与实验 1(n=97)中的冲动性指数 K 之间存在正相关关系,并且在实验 2(n=58)中得到了复制。成像分析进一步表明,漂移率在实验 1 中大脑特性(例如前额叶皮层激活和眶额皮层和楔前叶的灰质体积)与 K 之间的关系中具有显著的中介作用。IS-RSA 分析表明,漂移率的变异性也在激活模式的跨主体变化与 K 个体差异之间的关联中具有中介作用。这些发现表明,具有相似冲动性水平的个体可能表现出相似的价值处理模式,为损失框架内的冲动性个体差异提供了一种潜在的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/11316248/86cd8c97a33e/HBM-45-e26808-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验