Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 930 Madison Ave, Suite 769, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 930 Madison Ave, Suite 769, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura National University, Gamasa, 7731168, Mansoura, Egypt; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt.
Exp Eye Res. 2024 Oct;247:110031. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.110031. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Our previous studies have shown the benefit of intravitreal injection of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)- derived secretome to treat visual deficits in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) mouse model. In this study, we have addressed whether MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) overexpressing miR424, which particularly targets neuroinflammation, show similar benefits in the mTBI model. Adult C57BL/6 mice were subjected to a 50-psi air pulse on the left side, overlying the forebrain, resulting in mTBI. Sham-blast mice were controls. Within an hour of blast injury, 3 μl (∼7.5 × 10 particles) of miR424-EVs, native-EVs, or saline was delivered intravitreally. One month later, retinal morphology was observed through optical coherence tomography (OCT); visual function was assessed using optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and electroretinogram (ERG), followed by immunohistological analysis. A separate study in adult mice tested the dose-response of EVs for safety. Blast injury mice with saline showed decreased visual acuity compared with the sham group (0.30 ± 0.03 vs. 0.39 ± 0.01 c/d, p < 0.02), improved with miR424-EVs (0.39 ± 0.02 c/d, p < 0.01) but not native-EVs (0.33 ± 0.04 c/d, p > 0.05). Contrast sensitivity thresholds of blast mice receiving saline increased compared with the sham group (85.3 ± 5.9 vs. 19.9 ± 4.8, %, p < 0.001), rescued by miR424-EVs (23.6 ± 7.3 %, p < 0.001) and native-EVs (45.6 ± 10.7 %, p < 0.01). Blast injury decreased "b" wave amplitude compared to sham mice (94.6 ± 24.0 vs. 279.2 ± 25.3 μV, p < 0.001), improved with miR424-EVs (173.0 ± 27.2 μV, p < 0.03) and native-EVs (230.2 ± 37.2 μV, p < 0.01) with a similar decrease in a-wave amplitude in blast mice improved with both miR424-EVs and native-EVs. Immunohistology showed increased GFAP and IBA1 in blast mice with saline compared with sham (GFAP: 11.9 ± 1.49 vs. 9.1 ± 0.8, mean intensity/100,000 μm area, p < 0.03; IBA1: 36.08 ± 4.3 vs. 24.0 ± 1.54, mean intensity/100,000 μm area, p < 0.01), with no changes with native-EVs (GFAP: 12.6 ± 0.79, p > 0.05; IBA1: 32.8 ± 2.9, p > 0.05), and miR424-EV (GFAP: 13.14 ± 0.76, p > 0.05; IBA1: 31.4 ± 2.7, p > 0.05). Both native-EVs and miR424-EVs exhibited vitreous aggregation, as evidenced by particulates in the vitreous by OCT, and increased vascular structures, as evidenced by αSMA and CD31 immunostainings. The number of capillary lumens in the ganglion cell layer increased with increased particles in the eye, with native EVs showing the worst effects. In conclusion, our study highlights the promise of EV-based therapies for treating visual dysfunction caused by mTBI, with miR424-EVs showing particularly strong neuroprotective benefits. Both miR424-EVs and native-EVs provided similar protection, but issues with EV aggregation and astrogliosis or microglial/macrophage activation at the current dosage call for improved delivery methods and dosage adjustments. Future research should investigate the mechanisms behind EVs' effects and optimize miR424 delivery strategies to enhance therapeutic outcomes and reduce complications.
我们之前的研究表明,玻璃体内注射间充质干细胞(MSC)衍生的外泌体可治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)小鼠模型中的视力缺陷。在这项研究中,我们探讨了过表达 miR424 的 MSC 衍生细胞外囊泡(EV)是否在 mTBI 模型中显示出类似的益处,miR424 特别针对神经炎症。成年 C57BL/6 小鼠接受左额部的 50-psi 空气脉冲,导致 mTBI。假爆小鼠作为对照组。在爆震伤后 1 小时内,通过玻璃体内注射 miR424-EVs、天然-EVs 或生理盐水 3 μl(约 7.5×10 个颗粒)。一个月后,通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)观察视网膜形态;使用视觉动性眼球震颤(OKN)和视网膜电图(ERG)评估视觉功能,随后进行免疫组织化学分析。在成年小鼠中的一项单独研究测试了 EV 用于安全性的剂量反应。与假爆组相比,用生理盐水治疗的爆震伤小鼠的视力明显下降(0.30±0.03 与 0.39±0.01 c/d,p<0.02),用 miR424-EVs 治疗后有所改善(0.39±0.02 c/d,p<0.01),而用天然-EVs 治疗则没有改善(0.33±0.04 c/d,p>0.05)。接受生理盐水的爆震伤小鼠的对比敏感度阈值与假爆组相比增加(85.3±5.9 与 19.9±4.8,%,p<0.001),用 miR424-EVs (23.6±7.3%,p<0.001)和天然-EVs(45.6±10.7%,p<0.01)挽救。与假爆组相比,爆震伤降低了“b”波幅度(94.6±24.0 与 279.2±25.3 μV,p<0.001),用 miR424-EVs(173.0±27.2 μV,p<0.03)和天然-EVs(230.2±37.2 μV,p<0.01)改善,爆震伤小鼠的 a 波幅度也有类似的降低,用 miR424-EVs 和天然-EVs 都有改善。免疫组织化学显示,与假爆组相比,用生理盐水治疗的爆震伤小鼠的 GFAP 和 IBA1 增加(GFAP:11.9±1.49 与 9.1±0.8,平均强度/100,000μm 面积,p<0.03;IBA1:36.08±4.3 与 24.0±1.54,平均强度/100,000μm 面积,p<0.01),而用天然-EVs 没有变化(GFAP:12.6±0.79,p>0.05;IBA1:32.8±2.9,p>0.05),用 miR424-EVs 也没有变化(GFAP:13.14±0.76,p>0.05;IBA1:31.4±2.7,p>0.05)。天然-EVs 和 miR424-EVs 都表现出玻璃体聚集,这通过 OCT 中的玻璃体颗粒来证明,并且增加了血管结构,这通过 αSMA 和 CD31 免疫染色来证明。随着眼睛中颗粒的增加,神经节细胞层中的毛细血管腔数量增加,天然 EVs 显示出最严重的影响。总之,我们的研究强调了 EV 疗法治疗 mTBI 引起的视觉功能障碍的潜力,miR424-EVs 显示出特别强的神经保护益处。miR424-EVs 和天然-EVs 都提供了类似的保护,但 EV 聚集和星形胶质细胞/小胶质细胞/巨噬细胞激活的问题以及当前剂量的问题,需要改进的递送方法和剂量调整。未来的研究应该探讨 EV 作用的机制,并优化 miR424 的递送策略,以提高治疗效果并减少并发症。