Huettemann Robin, Sevov Benedict, Meister Sven, Fehring Leonard
Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Healthcare Informatics, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 8;10:20552076241271890. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271890. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Digital health ecosystems may be the next revolution in improving citizens' well-being, health delivery, data management, and health system processes, but solutions have not yet been broadly established. Reasons could be that health service-organizations have misaligned interests or lack capabilities. This study investigates reasons from a multi-health-service-organization perspective, differentiating between payers, insurers, healthcare providers, and innovators, detailing the expected value-adds, preferred participation roles, and required capabilities including a rating assessment.
Findings are based on a taxonomy development methodology, which combines a literature review with semi-structured qualitative expert interviews, conducted using a modified Delphi approach. Interviews were thematically analysed.
In total, 21 experts across the four health service-organization groups were interviewed. The capability taxonomy includes a total of 16 capabilities, categorized in three themes: 'Health market', 'organizational', and 'technology and informatic'. Providers expect a value-add from strengthening their health process economics through efficiency gains but reveal the largest capability gaps, especially in 'interoperability' and 'platform'. Innovators' 'technology and informatic' capabilities complement well with those of payers for the 'health market'.
We present a health service-organization-specific three-stage approach for establishing digital health ecosystems. Payers and insurers should address their 'technology and informatic' capability gaps, using technical enablers or forming new entities to reduce dependencies from legacy information technology systems. Innovators should clarify their monetization models and create positive awareness for their services, possibly entering the market directly. Providers must address interoperability issues and may require incentives to encourage their participation. Findings suggest governmental policymakers to prioritize three health policy initiatives.
数字健康生态系统可能是改善公民福祉、医疗服务提供、数据管理和卫生系统流程的下一次革命,但相关解决方案尚未广泛确立。原因可能是卫生服务组织利益不一致或缺乏能力。本研究从多卫生服务组织的角度调查原因,区分支付方、保险公司、医疗服务提供者和创新者,详细说明预期的附加值、偏好的参与角色以及所需能力,包括评级评估。
研究结果基于一种分类法开发方法,该方法将文献综述与半结构化定性专家访谈相结合,采用改进的德尔菲法进行。对访谈进行了主题分析。
总共采访了四个卫生服务组织群体的21名专家。能力分类法总共包括16种能力,分为三个主题:“健康市场”、“组织”和“技术与信息”。医疗服务提供者期望通过提高效率来增强其健康流程经济性从而获得附加值,但显示出最大的能力差距,尤其是在“互操作性”和“平台”方面。创新者的“技术与信息”能力与支付方在“健康市场”方面的能力互补性良好。
我们提出了一种针对卫生服务组织的三阶段方法来建立数字健康生态系统。支付方和保险公司应利用技术支持或组建新实体来解决其“技术与信息”能力差距,以减少对传统信息技术系统的依赖。创新者应明确其盈利模式,并为其服务树立积极的认知度,可能直接进入市场。医疗服务提供者必须解决互操作性问题,可能需要激励措施来鼓励他们参与。研究结果建议政府政策制定者优先考虑三项卫生政策举措。