• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康建议方面专家之间的冲突以及公众对健康专家相应的信任。

Conflict among experts in health recommendations and corresponding public trust in health experts.

作者信息

Mainous Arch G, Sharma Pooja, Yin Lu, Wang Ting, Johannes Bobbie L, Harrell Grant

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1430263. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1430263. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1430263
PMID:39131091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310036/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Public trust in health experts has been decreasing leading to decreased adherence to expert recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate public perceptions of conflict and uncertainty among experts in healthcare recommendations and association with decreased trust in health entities for accurate health information.

METHODS

Analysis of the US nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6-2022). Adults aged 18 and older were respondents to the survey (unweighted  = 5,842, representing 241 million adults). The main outcome was trust in doctors, scientists and government health agencies for health information. Analyses examined trust in experts with public perceptions of conflict about recommendations and changing recommendations.

RESULTS

There was high trust in doctors for health information (95%) versus 84% in scientists and 70% in government health agencies. Only 18% have high trust in the health information on social media. Respondents who felt expert recommendations change often were less likely to have high trust (65%) in government agencies compared to those who felt that the recommendations did not often change (82%) ( < 0.01). In logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, race, education, income and trust in social media for health information perceptions of low conflict among expert health recommendations is associated with likelihood of high trust in government health agencies (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.96-4.15).

CONCLUSION

The public has low trust in government health agencies and perceptions of conflict among experts over recommendations is likely playing a role in the erosion of trust in health experts.

摘要

重要性

公众对健康专家的信任一直在下降,导致对专家建议的依从性降低。

目的

评估公众对医疗保健建议中专家之间冲突和不确定性的看法,以及与对健康实体获取准确健康信息的信任度降低之间的关联。

方法

对具有全国代表性的美国健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS 6 - 2022)进行分析。18岁及以上的成年人是该调查的受访者(未加权=5842人,代表2.41亿成年人)。主要结果是对医生、科学家和政府卫生机构提供健康信息的信任度。分析考察了公众对建议冲突的看法以及建议变化时对专家的信任度。

结果

公众对医生提供健康信息的信任度较高(95%),而对科学家的信任度为84%,对政府卫生机构的信任度为7 O%。只有18%的人对社交媒体上的健康信息高度信任。与认为建议不常变化的受访者(82%)相比,认为专家建议经常变化的受访者对政府机构高度信任的可能性较小(65%)(P<0.01)。在控制年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、收入以及对社交媒体上健康信息信任度的逻辑回归分析中,专家健康建议中低冲突的认知与对政府卫生机构高度信任的可能性相关(比值比2.86;95%置信区间1.96 - 4.15)。

结论

公众对政府卫生机构的信任度较低,专家对建议的冲突看法可能在对健康专家信任的侵蚀中起作用。

相似文献

1
Conflict among experts in health recommendations and corresponding public trust in health experts.健康建议方面专家之间的冲突以及公众对健康专家相应的信任。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1430263. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1430263. eCollection 2024.
2
Variation in Trust in Cancer Information Sources by Perceptions of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation and by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study.美国成年人中,社交媒体健康错误信息和虚假信息认知以及种族和民族因素对癌症信息来源信任度的影响:横断面研究
JMIR Cancer. 2024 May 8;10:e54162. doi: 10.2196/54162.
3
Trends in Trust in the Sources of Health Information on E-Cigarettes Among US Adults, 2015-2017.2015-2017 年美国成年人对电子烟健康信息来源信任度的变化趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):145-147. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304754. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
4
Trust In US Federal, State, And Local Public Health Agencies During COVID-19: Responses And Policy Implications.在 COVID-19 期间信任美国联邦、州和地方公共卫生机构:回应和政策意义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):328-337. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01204.
5
Variations in Unmet Health Care Needs by Perceptions of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Frequency of Social Media Use, Medical Trust, and Medical Care Discrimination: Cross-Sectional Study.社交媒体健康错误和虚假信息认知、社交媒体使用频率、医疗信任和医疗保健歧视方面的未满足医疗需求的变化:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 11;10:e56881. doi: 10.2196/56881.
6
Climate Change Harm Perception Among U.S. Adults in the NCI Health Information National Trends Survey, 2022.美国成年人在 NCI 健康信息国家趋势调查中对气候变化危害的认知,2022 年。
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jun;38(5):625-632. doi: 10.1177/08901171241228339. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Trusting information on cancer varies by source of information and political viewpoint.人们对癌症信息的信任程度因信息来源和政治观点而异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01786-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Americans' Trust in Health Information Sources: Trends and Sociodemographic Predictors.美国人对健康信息来源的信任:趋势与社会人口统计学预测因素
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Nov;33(8):1187-1193. doi: 10.1177/0890117119861280. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Trust in scientific experts on obesity: implications for awareness and behavior change.对肥胖问题科学专家的信任:对认知和行为改变的影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Aug;15(8):2145-56. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.255.
10
Vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina: Do information sources and trust in information make a difference?南卡罗来纳州大学生对疫苗的接受度:信息来源和对信息的信任会产生影响吗?
medRxiv. 2020 Dec 4:2020.12.02.20242982. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.02.20242982.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientist trust in medical research: a survey of authors from 28 countries.科学家对医学研究的信任:对来自28个国家的作者的调查。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 9;12:1586885. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1586885. eCollection 2025.
2
Rural Patients' Perceived Importance of Racial and Ethnic Concordance With Providers and Receipt of Annual Routine Visits.农村患者对与医疗服务提供者种族和民族匹配以及接受年度常规就诊的感知重要性。
J Patient Exp. 2025 May 20;12:23743735251341732. doi: 10.1177/23743735251341732. eCollection 2025.
3
Social media and the spread of misinformation: infectious and a threat to public health.社交媒体与错误信息的传播:具有传染性且对公众健康构成威胁。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf023.
4
Papermills as another challenge to research integrity and trust in science.造纸厂成为对科研诚信和科学信任的又一挑战。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 28;12:1557024. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1557024. eCollection 2025.
5
An Essential Infinitebook for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Preoperative Planning.一本用于整形与重建外科术前规划的必备无限电子书。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 6;12(12):e6382. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006382. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review.社交媒体对疫苗接种的影响:叙事性综述。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 16;38(40):e326. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e326.
2
The Patient-Physician Relationship May Be the Key to Re-establishing Public Trust in Recommendations From Government Health Agencies.医患关系可能是重建公众对政府卫生机构建议信任的关键。
Fam Med. 2023 Sep;55(8):506-508. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.133029. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Trust In US Federal, State, And Local Public Health Agencies During COVID-19: Responses And Policy Implications.在 COVID-19 期间信任美国联邦、州和地方公共卫生机构:回应和政策意义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):328-337. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01204.
4
Polarized Public Opinion About Public Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Political Divides and Future Implications.新冠疫情期间关于公共卫生的两极化公众舆论:政治分歧与未来影响
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 1;3(3):e220016. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0016.
5
US CDC announces major changes after criticism of its responses to covid-19 and monkeypox.美国疾病控制与预防中心在因应对新冠疫情和猴痘疫情受到批评后宣布重大变革。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 23;378:o2074. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2074.
6
Trust in Health Care in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期对医疗保健的信任。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2373-2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23343.
7
Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.模型不确定性、政治争议与公众对科学的信任:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 21;6(43). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4563. Print 2020 Oct.
8
An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk.探讨假新闻如何接管社交媒体并威胁公众健康。
Health Info Libr J. 2021 Jun;38(2):143-149. doi: 10.1111/hir.12320. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
9
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?YouTube 上的 COVID-19 信息:信息错误大流行?
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604.
10
The role of patient-physician trust in moderating medication nonadherence due to cost pressures.患者与医生之间的信任在缓解因费用压力导致的用药不依从方面的作用。
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1749-55. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.15.1749.