• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用新型辐射防护装置时对整个心导管插入实验室团队的辐射剂量

Radiation Doses to the Entire Catheterization Laboratory Team With a Novel Radiation Protection Device.

作者信息

Parikh Malav J, Refahiyat Lahdan, Joseph Timothy A, McNamara David, Madder Ryan D

机构信息

Frederik Meijer Heart & Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 19;3(1):101109. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101109. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101109
PMID:39131980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel radiation protection system has recently been shown to shield the primary operator from scatter radiation, but whether it shields other members of the catheterization laboratory team remains unknown.

METHODS

Radiation exposure data were collected prospectively in 50 coronary angiography cases, in which 25 were completed using standard radiation protection and 25 with a novel system consisting of a series of rigid shields and flexible radiation-resistant drapes. Radiation doses, measured with real-time dosimeters, were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with respect to patient or procedural characteristics, including air kerma ( = .97) and dose area product ( = .17). The primary operator received a median head-level radiation dose of 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] μSv with the novel radiation protection system and 2.1 [0.7, 3.3] μSv with standard radiation protection ( < .001). Scrub technologists had a median head-level radiation dose of 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] μSv with the novel radiation protection system and 0.3 [0.1, 0.4] μSv with standard radiation protection ( < .001). The median head-level radiation dose among circulating nurses was 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] μSv with the novel radiation protection system and was 0.1 [0.0, 0.2] μSv with standard radiation protection ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to standard radiation protection with lead aprons, use of a novel radiation protection system during coronary angiography was associated with significantly lower head-level radiation doses among all members of the catheterization laboratory team.

摘要

背景

最近有研究表明,一种新型辐射防护系统可使主操作人员免受散射辐射,但该系统能否保护心导管插入实验室团队的其他成员尚不清楚。

方法

前瞻性收集50例冠状动脉造影病例的辐射暴露数据,其中25例使用标准辐射防护完成,25例使用由一系列刚性防护屏和柔性抗辐射帘布组成的新型系统完成。用实时剂量仪测量两组的辐射剂量并进行比较。

结果

两组在患者或手术特征方面无显著差异,包括空气比释动能(=0.97)和剂量面积乘积(=0.17)。使用新型辐射防护系统时,主操作人员头部水平的辐射剂量中位数为0.0[0.0,0.0]μSv,使用标准辐射防护时为2.1[0.7,3.3]μSv(<.001)。刷手技师使用新型辐射防护系统时头部水平的辐射剂量中位数为0.0[0.0,0.0]μSv,使用标准辐射防护时为0.3[0.1,0.4]μSv(<.001)。巡回护士使用新型辐射防护系统时头部水平的辐射剂量中位数为0.0[0.0,0.0]μSv,使用标准辐射防护时为0.1[0.0,0.2]μSv(<.001)。

结论

与使用铅围裙的标准辐射防护相比,在冠状动脉造影过程中使用新型辐射防护系统可使心导管插入实验室团队所有成员的头部水平辐射剂量显著降低。

相似文献

1
Radiation Doses to the Entire Catheterization Laboratory Team With a Novel Radiation Protection Device.使用新型辐射防护装置时对整个心导管插入实验室团队的辐射剂量
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 19;3(1):101109. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101109. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Radiation Exposure Among Scrub Technologists and Nurse Circulators During Cardiac Catheterization: The Impact of Accessory Lead Shields.在心脏导管插入术中,洗手护士和巡回护士的辐射暴露:附件导联屏蔽的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.026. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
Comprehensive Radiation Shield Minimizes Operator Radiation Exposure and Obviates Need for Lead Aprons.综合辐射防护装置可将操作人员的辐射暴露降至最低,并消除对铅围裙的需求。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 21;2(3):100603. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100603. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
4
Comprehensive Shielding System Enhances Radiation Protection for Structural Heart Procedures.综合屏蔽系统增强了结构性心脏病手术的辐射防护。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 19;3(1):101110. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101110. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Comprehensive radiation shield minimizes operator radiation exposure in coronary and structural heart procedures.全面的辐射屏蔽可最大程度降低冠状动脉和结构性心脏病介入治疗中术者的辐射暴露。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jul;64:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
6
Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.评估一种用于桡动脉入路的新型介入心脏病学防护装置与散射减少帘布相结合的临床职业剂量降低效果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):935-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26009. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
7
Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield.采用新型垂直辐射防护装置减少心脏导管插入实验室的辐射暴露
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;95(1):7-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28629. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.血管内手术过程中手术室人员和患者的辐射暴露。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
Impact of patient obesity on radiation doses received by scrub technologists during coronary angiography.患者肥胖对冠状动脉造影术中刷手技师所接受辐射剂量的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8):929-933. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
10
A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures.一项关于在神经血管内介入手术中,将零重力系统与标准铅围裙作为辐射防护策略的前瞻性病例对照比较。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Oct;8(10):1052-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012038. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiation Safety Renaissance: Will State Regulations Help or Hinder an Emergence From the Dark Ages?辐射安全的复兴:州法规会有助于还是阻碍走出黑暗时代?
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Apr 30;4(6):103612. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103612. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel comprehensive radiation shielding system eliminates need for personal lead aprons in the catheterization laboratory.一种新型综合辐射屏蔽系统使导管实验室不再需要个人铅围裙。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):79-86. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30490. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Suspended lead suit and physician radiation doses during coronary angiography.冠状动脉造影期间的悬吊铅衣与医生辐射剂量
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):981-988. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30047. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
A Novel Catheterization Laboratory Radiation Shielding System: Results of Pre-Clinical Testing.
一种新型导管室辐射屏蔽系统:临床前测试结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Impact of patient obesity on radiation doses received by scrub technologists during coronary angiography.患者肥胖对冠状动脉造影术中刷手技师所接受辐射剂量的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8):929-933. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
5
Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Operators Performing Endovascular Aortic Repair.接受血管内主动脉修复手术的操作人员的辐射诱导DNA损伤。
Circulation. 2017 Dec 19;136(25):2406-2416. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029550. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff: A systematic review and meta-analysis.介入心脏病学家和导管室工作人员患白内障的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27114. Epub 2017 May 13.
7
Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers.心血管介入导管室工作人员的职业健康风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003273. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003273.
8
Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and early vascular aging from long-term low-dose ionizing radiation exposure: a genetic, telomere, and vascular ultrasound study in cardiac catheterization laboratory staff.长期低剂量电离辐射暴露与亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化及早期血管老化:心内科导管室工作人员的遗传、端粒和血管超声研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):616-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.233.
9
Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: Results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey.当前十年介入心脏病学家的职业健康危害:2014年心血管造影和介入学会会员调查结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):913-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25927. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Occupational health hazards of working in the interventional laboratory: a multisite case control study of physicians and allied staff.介入实验室工作的职业健康危害:一项针对医师和相关工作人员的多中心病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):820-826. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.056.