Tyler Timothy, Stojanoff Erik, Cannon Joan, Um Jessie J, Young Stacia, Holmes Jarrod P, Brent Lonnie D, Martin Nancy
From Comprehensive Cancer Center at Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, California.
TerSera Therapeutics, Deerfield, Illinois.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):125-135. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.2.5. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a recognized concern for chemotherapy, biologic agents, and newer immunotherapies. Antihistamines are frequently recommended to prevent or manage these reactions. For over 60 years, diphenhydramine has been the only H antihistamine for intravenous (IV) administration. It has been considered the standard of care as part of premedication regimens to prevent IRRs associated with these therapies despite the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication and no evidence of efficacy data. Intravenous cetirizine was approved in 2019 for acute urticaria treatment, making it the only second-generation H antihistamine that can be administered intravenously. Compared with diphenhydramine, cetirizine has an improved safety profile with less sedation, fewer contraindications, lower incidence of anticholinergic side effects, and minimal risk of adverse events in elderly patients. A head-to-head study demonstrated that IV cetirizine is as effective as IV diphenhydramine in reducing IRRs and may decrease chair time, treatment center visits, and the need for rescue medication. Over the past 3 decades, the FDA has addressed the issue of IRRs by mandating language regarding the requirement or recommendation for premedication in the label of over 50 FDA-approved infusion products. As more therapeutics have premedication required or recommended, IV cetirizine should be considered an antihistamine for preventing and treating IRRs. In this article, we describe a patient whose IRR was successfully managed with IV cetirizine and discuss first- vs. second-generation H antihistamines and their use in treating and preventing IRRs.
输液相关反应(IRRs)是化疗、生物制剂和新型免疫疗法中公认的一个问题。抗组胺药常被推荐用于预防或处理这些反应。60多年来,苯海拉明一直是唯一可静脉注射的H抗组胺药。尽管缺乏美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的适应证且没有疗效数据的证据,但它一直被视为预防与这些疗法相关的输液相关反应的预处理方案的护理标准。静脉注射西替利嗪于2019年被批准用于治疗急性荨麻疹,使其成为唯一可静脉注射的第二代H抗组胺药。与苯海拉明相比,西替利嗪的安全性更高,镇静作用更小,禁忌证更少,抗胆碱能副作用的发生率更低,老年患者发生不良事件的风险极小。一项对比研究表明,静脉注射西替利嗪在减少输液相关反应方面与静脉注射苯海拉明同样有效,并且可能会减少就诊时间、治疗中心就诊次数以及急救药物的需求。在过去30年里,FDA通过在50多种FDA批准的输液产品标签中强制加入关于预处理要求或建议的说明,解决了输液相关反应的问题。随着越来越多的治疗方法要求或建议进行预处理,静脉注射西替利嗪应被视为预防和治疗输液相关反应的抗组胺药。在本文中,我们描述了一名使用静脉注射西替利嗪成功处理输液相关反应的患者,并讨论了第一代和第二代H抗组胺药及其在治疗和预防输液相关反应中的应用。