Suppr超能文献

用于婴儿喂养培训的远程模拟:一项随机对照试验。

Telesimulation for Training in Infant Feeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Marshall Jeanne, Shiu Charis, Raatz Madeline, Penman Adriana, Beak Kelly, Clarke Sally, Ward Elizabeth C

机构信息

Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2025 Apr;40(2):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10746-7. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

Abstract

Simulation is an education modality known to support clinical skill development. Unfortunately, access to simulation has been challenging, both prior to and during the pandemic. Simulation via telepractice, i.e., "telesimulation", has emerged, but little is known about whether outcomes are comparable to in-person simulation. This study compared in-person versus telesimulation learner outcomes in an infant feeding scenario. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes between novice and experienced participants.This pragmatic randomized controlled trial included speech pathologists who could attend if randomized to the in-person modality. Block randomization matched participants with < 6 months' infant feeding experience to those with > 6 months experience (2:1 ratio) into telesimulation or in-person simulation. Measures of clinical reasoning, confidence/anxiety, and satisfaction were collected, pre-, post-, and 4-weeks post-simulation.Overall, 39 clinicians completed either in-person simulation (n = 17) or telesimulation training (n = 22), including 16 experienced and 23 novice learners. Both in-person and telesimulation groups achieved significant improvements across time in clinical reasoning, self-reported confidence, and anxiety. The extent of change in clinical reasoning, confidence and anxiety was comparable between the telesimulation and in-person simulation groups. Comparing by experience, novice-level participants reported significantly greater changes in confidence and anxiety than experienced participants. Satisfaction levels were high regardless of simulation modality or experience.Participants in telesimulation and in-person simulation achieved similar improvements in the primary outcome measure of clinical reasoning, had comparable improvements in self-perceived confidence and anxiety, and demonstrated high satisfaction levels. Telesimulation is a promising means to improve clinician access to simulation training in infant feeding.

摘要

模拟是一种已知可支持临床技能发展的教育方式。不幸的是,在大流行之前及期间,使用模拟技术都面临挑战。通过远程实践进行的模拟,即“远程模拟”已经出现,但对于其结果是否与面对面模拟相当却知之甚少。本研究比较了在婴儿喂养场景中面对面模拟与远程模拟的学习者结果。次要目的是比较新手和有经验的参与者之间的结果。这项实用的随机对照试验纳入了如果被随机分配到面对面模式就可以参加的言语病理学家。区组随机化将婴儿喂养经验少于6个月的参与者与经验超过6个月的参与者(2:1比例)匹配到远程模拟或面对面模拟中。在模拟前、模拟后和模拟后4周收集临床推理、信心/焦虑和满意度的测量数据。

总体而言,39名临床医生完成了面对面模拟(n = 17)或远程模拟训练(n = 22),包括16名有经验的学习者和23名新手学习者。面对面组和远程模拟组在临床推理、自我报告的信心和焦虑方面随时间推移均取得了显著改善。远程模拟组和面对面模拟组在临床推理、信心和焦虑方面的变化程度相当。按经验比较,新手水平的参与者在信心和焦虑方面的变化比有经验的参与者显著更大。无论模拟方式或经验如何,满意度都很高。

远程模拟和面对面模拟的参与者在临床推理的主要结果测量方面取得了类似的改善,在自我感知的信心和焦虑方面有相当的改善,并表现出很高的满意度。远程模拟是一种有前景的方式,可改善临床医生获得婴儿喂养模拟训练的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b47/11893704/7e88ebc006f0/455_2024_10746_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验