• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对自闭症成年人在三元对话中注意力分配的行为干预:A/B测试前后研究

Behavioral Intervention for Adults With Autism on Distribution of Attention in Triadic Conversations: A/B-Tested Pre-Post Study.

作者信息

Tepencelik Onur Necip, Wei Wenchuan, Luo Mirabel, Cosman Pamela, Dey Sujit

机构信息

Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Carlsbad High School, Carlsbad, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e55339. doi: 10.2196/55339.

DOI:10.2196/55339
PMID:39133914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11347890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cross-neurotype differences in social communication patterns contribute to high unemployment rates among adults with autism. Adults with autism can be unsuccessful in job searches or terminated from employment due to mismatches between their social attention behaviors and society's expectations on workplace communication.

OBJECTIVE

We propose a behavioral intervention concerning distribution of attention in triadic (three-way) conversations. Specifically, the objective is to determine whether providing personalized feedback to each individual with autism based on an analysis of their attention distribution behavior during an initial conversation session would cause them to modify their orientation behavior in a subsequent conversation session.

METHODS

Our system uses an unobtrusive head orientation estimation model to track the focus of attention of each individual. Head orientation sequences from a conversation session are analyzed based on five statistical domains (eg, maximum exclusion duration and average contact duration) representing different types of attention distribution behavior. An intervention is provided to a participant if they exceeded the nonautistic average for that behavior by at least 2 SDs. The intervention uses data analysis and video modeling along with a constructive discussion about the targeted behaviors. Twenty-four individuals with autism with no intellectual disabilities participated in the study. The participants were divided into test and control groups of 12 participants each.

RESULTS

Based on their attention distribution behavior in the initial conversation session, 11 of the 12 participants in the test group received an intervention in at least one domain. Of the 11 participants who received the intervention, 10 showed improvement in at least one domain on which they received feedback. Independent t tests for larger test groups (df>15) confirmed that the group improvements are statistically significant compared with the corresponding controls (P<.05). Crawford-Howell t tests confirmed that 78% of the interventions resulted in significant improvements when compared individually against corresponding controls (P<.05). Additional t tests comparing the first conversation sessions of the test and control groups and comparing the first and second conversation sessions of the control group resulted in nonsignificant differences, pointing to the intervention being the main effect behind the behavioral changes displayed by the test group, as opposed to confounding effects or group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed behavioral intervention offers a useful framework for practicing social attention behavior in multiparty conversations that are common in social and professional settings.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/4ffffa31a7f5/formative_v8i1e55339_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/17baa2ac20e8/formative_v8i1e55339_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/3e0d12f7caee/formative_v8i1e55339_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/326aea49ae85/formative_v8i1e55339_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/4ffffa31a7f5/formative_v8i1e55339_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/17baa2ac20e8/formative_v8i1e55339_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/3e0d12f7caee/formative_v8i1e55339_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/326aea49ae85/formative_v8i1e55339_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a4/11347890/4ffffa31a7f5/formative_v8i1e55339_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

社交沟通模式中的跨神经类型差异导致自闭症成年人失业率较高。自闭症成年人可能在求职过程中不成功,或因他们的社交注意力行为与社会对职场沟通的期望不匹配而被解雇。

目的

我们提出一项关于三元(三方)对话中注意力分配的行为干预措施。具体而言,目标是确定在初始对话环节中,基于对自闭症个体注意力分配行为的分析,为其提供个性化反馈是否会使其在后续对话环节中改变其定向行为。

方法

我们的系统使用一种不引人注意的头部定向估计模型来跟踪每个人的注意力焦点。根据代表不同类型注意力分配行为的五个统计领域(例如,最大排除持续时间和平均接触持续时间),分析对话环节中的头部定向序列。如果参与者在该行为上超过非自闭症者的平均值至少2个标准差,则对其进行干预。该干预措施使用数据分析和视频建模,以及关于目标行为的建设性讨论。24名无智力障碍的自闭症个体参与了该研究。参与者被分为测试组和对照组,每组12人。

结果

根据他们在初始对话环节中的注意力分配行为,测试组12名参与者中有11名在至少一个领域接受了干预。在接受干预的11名参与者中,10名在他们收到反馈的至少一个领域有所改善。对更大测试组(自由度>15)进行的独立t检验证实,与相应对照组相比,该组的改善具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。克劳福德 - 豪厄尔t检验证实,与相应对照组单独比较时,78%的干预措施导致了显著改善(P<0.05)。比较测试组和对照组第一次对话环节以及比较对照组第一次和第二次对话环节的额外t检验结果无显著差异,这表明干预是测试组所表现出的行为变化背后的主要影响因素,而非混淆效应或组间差异。

结论

我们提出的行为干预措施为在社交和专业环境中常见的多方对话中练习社交注意力行为提供了一个有用的框架。

相似文献

1
Behavioral Intervention for Adults With Autism on Distribution of Attention in Triadic Conversations: A/B-Tested Pre-Post Study.针对自闭症成年人在三元对话中注意力分配的行为干预:A/B测试前后研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e55339. doi: 10.2196/55339.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Increasing appropriate conversation skills using a behavioral skills training package for adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder.使用行为技能训练包提高智障和自闭症谱系障碍成年人的适当对话技能。
J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Dec;23(4):567-580. doi: 10.1177/1744629517750744. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
5
6
7
8
Social conversation skill improvements associated with the Social Tools And Rules for Teens program for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Results of a randomized controlled trial.社会工具和规则对青少年自闭症谱系障碍青少年社交会话技能的改善:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Autism. 2019 Jul;23(5):1224-1235. doi: 10.1177/1362361318808781. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Using Virtual Reality Environments to Augment Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Fears and Phobias in Autistic Adults.使用虚拟现实环境增强对成年自闭症患者恐惧和恐惧症的认知行为疗法。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):134-145. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0019. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Context Modulates Attention to Faces in Dynamic Social Scenes in Children and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.语境调节自闭症谱系障碍儿童和成人对动态社交场景中面孔的注意力。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Oct;52(10):4219-4232. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05279-z. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Identifying Autism with Head Movement Features by Implementing Machine Learning Algorithms.运用机器学习算法,通过头部运动特征识别自闭症。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3038-3049. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05179-2. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
3
Autistic differences in the temporal dynamics of social attention.
自闭症个体在社会注意力的时间动态方面存在差异。
Autism. 2021 Aug;25(6):1615-1626. doi: 10.1177/1362361321998573. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Investigating Gaze Behaviour of Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Classroom Setting.在课堂环境中调查被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童的注视行为。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Dec;51(12):4663-4678. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04906-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Atypical Head Movement during Face-to-Face Interaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童在面对面互动中的非典型头部运动。
Autism Res. 2021 Jun;14(6):1197-1208. doi: 10.1002/aur.2478. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Social orienting and social seeking behaviors in ASD. A meta analytic investigation.自闭症谱系障碍中的社会定向与社会寻求行为:一项元分析调查
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:376-395. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Social Interaction Skill Intervention for Autistic Adults with Intellectual Disability and Limited Language: A Pilot of the SKILL Program.针对智障和语言能力有限的成年自闭症患者的社交互动技能干预:SKILL 项目试点
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 May;51(5):1641-1657. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04659-1.
8
Perspective influences eye movements during real-life conversation: Mentalising about self versus others in autism.视角会影响现实生活对话中的眼动:关于自闭症中自我与他人的心理理论。
Autism. 2020 Nov;24(8):2153-2165. doi: 10.1177/1362361320936820. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
How accurate are autistic adults and those high in autistic traits at making face-to-face line-of-sight judgements?患有自闭症的成年人以及具有高度自闭症特征的人在进行面对面视线判断时的准确性如何?
Autism. 2020 Aug;24(6):1482-1493. doi: 10.1177/1362361320909176. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Autism spectrum disorder symptoms from ages 2 to 19 years: Implications for diagnosing adolescents and young adults.2 至 19 岁自闭症谱系障碍症状:对青少年和青年诊断的影响。
Autism Res. 2019 Jan;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1002/aur.2004. Epub 2018 Aug 12.