• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地质层序叠置序列中二氧化碳储存的流域尺度研究。

Basin-scale study of CO storage in stacked sequence of geological formations.

作者信息

Wijaya Nur, Morgan David, Vikara Derek, Grant Timothy, Cunha Luciane, Liu Guoxiang

机构信息

National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Support Contractor, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236, USA.

NETL, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66272-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-66272-x
PMID:39134560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11319453/
Abstract

Commercial scale decarbonization through carbon capture and storage may likely involve many CO storage projects located in close proximity. The close proximity could raise concerns over caprock integrity associated with reservoir pressure buildup and interference among adjacent projects. Commercial-scale injection will also require large prospective CO storage resource and high injectivity in the targeted storage formations. To accommodate the need for both large resource and high injectivity, project operators could consider injecting CO into a stacked sequence of formations. This analysis investigates the benefits of injecting CO into a vertically stacked sequence of saline formations, over injecting the same amount of CO into a single saline formation, in addressing these challenges. Our analysis shows that injecting into the stacked sequence mitigates the extent of pressure buildup among the stacked formations, while still achieving the same or greater target CO storage volumes. Among cases modeled, the resulting pressure buildup front is most reduced when each storage site distributes injection volumes over several wells, each of which injects a portion of the total CO mass across the stacked sequence. This favorable case not only results in the smallest CO aerial footprint, but also shows the largest reduction in the pressure buildup at the top of perforation at the injection wells (upwards of approximately 46% compared to the single-formation storage), the result of which is crucial to maintain caprock integrity. This analysis provides insights into required decision-making when considering multi-project deployment in a shared basin.

摘要

通过碳捕获与封存实现商业规模的脱碳可能涉及许多地理位置相近的二氧化碳封存项目。项目位置相近可能引发对与储层压力积聚相关的盖层完整性以及相邻项目间相互干扰的担忧。商业规模的注入还需要大量潜在的二氧化碳封存资源以及目标封存地层的高注入性。为满足对大量资源和高注入性的需求，项目运营商可考虑将二氧化碳注入一系列叠置的地层中。本分析研究了相较于将等量二氧化碳注入单一盐层，将其注入垂直叠置的盐层序列在应对这些挑战方面的益处。我们的分析表明，注入叠置序列可减轻叠置地层间压力积聚的程度，同时仍能实现相同或更大的目标二氧化碳封存量。在模拟的案例中，当每个储存场地将注入量分配到几口井上，每口井在整个叠置序列中注入一部分二氧化碳总量时，所产生的压力积聚前沿减小得最为显著。这种有利的情况不仅会使二氧化碳的平面覆盖面积最小，还会使注入井射孔顶部的压力积聚降低幅度最大（与单地层储存相比，降低幅度超过约46%），这一结果对于维持盖层完整性至关重要。本分析为在共享盆地中考虑多项目部署时所需的决策提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a979b08297e7/41598_2024_66272_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a5855a6cd20f/41598_2024_66272_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a624bc2bb219/41598_2024_66272_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/1911e8b77485/41598_2024_66272_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/ca578b653fa8/41598_2024_66272_Fig4a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/09f3d6e29ddd/41598_2024_66272_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/fcfdd4b80897/41598_2024_66272_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/86395cbf794d/41598_2024_66272_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/5692250ae1ed/41598_2024_66272_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/1bd132237710/41598_2024_66272_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/e8236072a8c8/41598_2024_66272_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a2b707e30418/41598_2024_66272_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/5359cf58338a/41598_2024_66272_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/7d528d45d4f2/41598_2024_66272_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/48978c0b57a6/41598_2024_66272_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/3fcb218f6974/41598_2024_66272_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/187e1bb451ca/41598_2024_66272_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/c229f77d5494/41598_2024_66272_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/752b3d6961e0/41598_2024_66272_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a979b08297e7/41598_2024_66272_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a5855a6cd20f/41598_2024_66272_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a624bc2bb219/41598_2024_66272_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/1911e8b77485/41598_2024_66272_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/ca578b653fa8/41598_2024_66272_Fig4a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/09f3d6e29ddd/41598_2024_66272_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/fcfdd4b80897/41598_2024_66272_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/86395cbf794d/41598_2024_66272_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/5692250ae1ed/41598_2024_66272_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/1bd132237710/41598_2024_66272_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/e8236072a8c8/41598_2024_66272_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a2b707e30418/41598_2024_66272_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/5359cf58338a/41598_2024_66272_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/7d528d45d4f2/41598_2024_66272_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/48978c0b57a6/41598_2024_66272_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/3fcb218f6974/41598_2024_66272_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/187e1bb451ca/41598_2024_66272_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/c229f77d5494/41598_2024_66272_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/752b3d6961e0/41598_2024_66272_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59da/11319453/a979b08297e7/41598_2024_66272_Fig19_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Basin-scale study of CO storage in stacked sequence of geological formations.地质层序叠置序列中二氧化碳储存的流域尺度研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66272-x.
2
Modeling basin- and plume-scale processes of CO2 storage for full-scale deployment.建立模型，模拟全规模部署下的 CO2 储存的流域和羽流尺度过程。
Ground Water. 2010 Jul-Aug;48(4):494-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00657.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
3
Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.从大型固定源分离和捕获二氧化碳并封存于地质构造——煤层和深部盐水层中。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Jun;53(6):645-715. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466206.
4
Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.二氧化碳地质封存与其他沉积盆地资源相互作用的评估框架。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2016 Feb;18(2):164-75. doi: 10.1039/c5em00539f.
5
Geomechanics contribution to CO storage containment and trapping mechanisms in tight sandstone complexes: A case study on Mae Moh Basin.地质力学对致密砂岩复合体中二氧化碳储存封隔和捕集机制的贡献：以湄公河盆地为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 10;928:172326. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172326. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa.南非布雷达斯多普盆地一个油藏中地质碳储存的动态建模
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):16573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43773-9.
7
Multiwell CO2 injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup.多井 CO2 注入能力：边界条件和卤水提取对地质 CO2 存储效率和压力积累的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 21;48(2):1067-74. doi: 10.1021/es4017014. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
8
A modelling study to evaluate the effect of impure CO on reservoir performance in a sandstone saline aquifer.一项评估不纯一氧化碳对砂岩盐水层储层性能影响的模拟研究。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 3;6(8):e04597. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04597. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations.最大允许成本对盐层中二氧化碳封存容量的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Nov 17;49(22):13510-8. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02836. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Salt precipitation and associated pressure buildup during CO storage in heterogeneous anisotropy aquifers.在非均质地层各向异性含水层中进行 CO2 储存时盐沉淀及相关压力积聚。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):8650-8664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16322-y. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling basin- and plume-scale processes of CO2 storage for full-scale deployment.建立模型，模拟全规模部署下的 CO2 储存的流域和羽流尺度过程。
Ground Water. 2010 Jul-Aug;48(4):494-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00657.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
2
Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA.美国城市树木的碳储存与封存
Environ Pollut. 2002;116(3):381-9. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00214-7.