• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在脑卒中后患者的机器人辅助倾斜台运动期间进行心率的反馈控制:一项临床可行性研究。

Feedback control of heart rate during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise in patients after stroke: a clinical feasibility study.

机构信息

rehaLab-the Laboratory for Rehabilitation Engineering, Institute for Human Centred Engineering HuCE, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Sciences, 2501, Biel, Switzerland.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and North-Eastern Stroke Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Aug 12;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01440-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01440-8
PMID:39135048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11318246/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurological disorders including stroke use rehabilitation to improve cognitive abilities, to regain motor function and to reduce the risk of further complications. Robotics-assisted tilt table technology has been developed to provide early mobilisation and to automate therapy involving the lower limbs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of employing a feedback control system for heart rate (HR) during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise in patients after a stroke.

METHODS

This feasibility study was designed as a case series with 12 patients ( ) with no restriction on the time post-stroke or on the degree of post-stroke impairment severity. A robotics-assisted tilt table was augmented with force sensors, a work rate estimation algorithm, and a biofeedback screen that facilitated volitional control of a target work rate. Dynamic models of HR response to changes in target work rate were estimated in system identification tests; nominal models were used to calculate the parameters of feedback controllers designed to give a specified closed-loop bandwidth; and the accuracy of HR control was assessed quantitatively in feedback control tests.

RESULTS

Feedback control tests were successfully conducted in all 12 patients. Dynamic models of heart rate response to imposed work rate were estimated with a mean root-mean-square (RMS) model error of 2.16 beats per minute (bpm), while highly accurate feedback control of heart rate was achieved with a mean RMS tracking error (RMSE) of 2.00 bpm. Control accuracy, i.e. RMSE, was found to be strongly correlated with the magnitude of heart rate variability (HRV): patients with a low magnitude of HRV had low RMSE, i.e. more accurate HR control performance, and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback control of heart rate during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise was found to be feasible. Future work should investigate robustness aspects of the feedback control system. Modifications to the exercise modality, or alternative modalities, should be explored that allow higher levels of work rate and heart rate intensity to be achieved.

摘要

背景

包括中风在内的神经障碍患者使用康复来提高认知能力、恢复运动功能并降低进一步并发症的风险。机器人辅助倾斜台技术已经开发出来,用于提供早期运动并使涉及下肢的治疗自动化。本研究的目的是评估在中风后患者中使用心率(HR)反馈控制系统进行机器人辅助倾斜台运动的可行性。

方法

这项可行性研究设计为病例系列,共有 12 名患者(),没有对中风后时间或中风后损伤严重程度的限制。机器人辅助倾斜台配备了力传感器、工作速率估计算法和生物反馈屏幕,以促进目标工作速率的自愿控制。在系统识别测试中估计了 HR 对目标工作速率变化的响应的动态模型;名义模型用于计算设计用于提供指定闭环带宽的反馈控制器的参数;并在反馈控制测试中定量评估 HR 控制的准确性。

结果

所有 12 名患者均成功进行了反馈控制测试。使用平均均方根(RMS)模型误差为 2.16 次/分钟(bpm)估计了心率对施加的工作速率的响应动态模型,而心率的高度精确反馈控制实现了平均 RMS 跟踪误差(RMSE)为 2.00 bpm。控制精度,即 RMSE,被发现与心率变异性(HRV)的幅度强烈相关:HRV 幅度低的患者具有低 RMSE,即心率控制性能更准确,反之亦然。

结论

发现机器人辅助倾斜台运动期间心率的反馈控制是可行的。未来的工作应该研究反馈控制系统的鲁棒性方面。应探索运动模式的修改或替代模式,以实现更高水平的工作速率和心率强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/96bcdbdcd34d/12984_2024_1440_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/53f8584ab17b/12984_2024_1440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/2c4926530e17/12984_2024_1440_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/adf6a2dc16a1/12984_2024_1440_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/1cae4e15c317/12984_2024_1440_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/aa853fd15789/12984_2024_1440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/176a15110c29/12984_2024_1440_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/a0f418a13d4e/12984_2024_1440_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/060f7755bc5f/12984_2024_1440_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/cad014326dc1/12984_2024_1440_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/4afe70814a04/12984_2024_1440_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/effead377d8b/12984_2024_1440_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/96bcdbdcd34d/12984_2024_1440_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/53f8584ab17b/12984_2024_1440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/2c4926530e17/12984_2024_1440_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/adf6a2dc16a1/12984_2024_1440_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/1cae4e15c317/12984_2024_1440_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/aa853fd15789/12984_2024_1440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/176a15110c29/12984_2024_1440_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/a0f418a13d4e/12984_2024_1440_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/060f7755bc5f/12984_2024_1440_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/cad014326dc1/12984_2024_1440_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/4afe70814a04/12984_2024_1440_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/effead377d8b/12984_2024_1440_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/133f/11318246/96bcdbdcd34d/12984_2024_1440_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feedback control of heart rate during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise in patients after stroke: a clinical feasibility study.在脑卒中后患者的机器人辅助倾斜台运动期间进行心率的反馈控制:一项临床可行性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Aug 12;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01440-8.
2
Changes in heart rate variability at rest and during exercise in patients after a stroke: a feasibility study.中风后患者静息和运动期间心率变异性的变化:一项可行性研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Dec 26;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01328-7.
3
Work-rate-guided exercise testing in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury using a robotics-assisted tilt-table.使用机器人辅助倾斜台对不完全性脊髓损伤患者进行工作负荷引导的运动测试。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):433-8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.908246. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Feasibility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and training using a robotics-assisted tilt table in dependent-ambulatory stroke patients.在依赖他人行走的中风患者中使用机器人辅助倾斜台进行心肺运动测试和训练的可行性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Sep 26;12:88. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0078-5.
5
Cardiopulmonary performance testing using a robotics-assisted tilt table: feasibility assessment in able-bodied subjects.使用机器人辅助倾斜台进行心肺功能测试:在健康受试者中的可行性评估。
Technol Health Care. 2014 Jan 1;22(2):179-87. doi: 10.3233/THC-140783.
6
Feedback-controlled robotics-assisted treadmill exercise to assess and influence aerobic capacity early after stroke: a proof-of-concept study.反馈控制的机器人辅助跑步机训练对中风后早期有氧能力的评估及影响:一项概念验证研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jul;9(4):271-8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.785038. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
Cardiovascular rehabilitation soon after stroke using feedback-controlled robotics-assisted treadmill exercise: study protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial.中风后早期使用反馈控制机器人辅助跑步机运动进行心血管康复:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Sep 22;14:304. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-304.
8
Test-retest reliability and four-week changes in cardiopulmonary fitness in stroke patients: evaluation using a robotics-assisted tilt table.中风患者心肺适能的重测信度及四周变化:使用机器人辅助倾斜台进行评估
BMC Neurol. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0686-0.
9
Impact of smart force feedback rehabilitation robot training on upper limb motor function in the subacute stage of stroke.智能力反馈康复机器人训练对脑卒中亚急性期上肢运动功能的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(2):209-215. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203130.
10
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing early after stroke using feedback-controlled robotics-assisted treadmill exercise: test-retest reliability and repeatability.中风后早期使用反馈控制的机器人辅助跑步机运动进行心肺运动测试:重测信度和可重复性
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Oct 11;11:145. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-145.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in heart rate variability at rest and during exercise in patients after a stroke: a feasibility study.中风后患者静息和运动期间心率变异性的变化:一项可行性研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Dec 26;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01328-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthostatic Hypotension: A Practical Approach.直立性低血压:实用方法。
Am Fam Physician. 2022 Jan 1;105(1):39-49.
2
Real-Time Avatar-Based Feedback to Enhance the Symmetry of Spatiotemporal Parameters After Stroke: Instantaneous Effects of Different Avatar Views.基于实时头像的反馈以增强中风后时空参数的对称性:不同头像视图的即时影响。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020 Apr;28(4):878-887. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2979830. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Identification and comparison of heart-rate dynamics during cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise.
在自行车测力计和跑步机运动中识别和比较心率动态。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0220826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220826. eCollection 2019.
4
EMG Muscle Activation Pattern of Four Lower Extremity Muscles during Stair Climbing, Motor Imagery, and Robot-Assisted Stepping: A Cross-Sectional Study in Healthy Individuals.健康个体在爬楼梯、运动想象和机器人辅助行走过程中四肢四块肌肉的肌电图肌肉激活模式:一项横断面研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 25;2019:9351689. doi: 10.1155/2019/9351689. eCollection 2019.
5
Gait Training With Visual Feedback and Proprioceptive Input to Reduce Gait Asymmetry in Adults With Cerebral Palsy: A Case Series.使用视觉反馈和本体感觉输入进行步态训练以减少成人脑瘫患者的步态不对称:病例系列
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;29(2):138-145. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000362.
6
Test-retest reliability and four-week changes in cardiopulmonary fitness in stroke patients: evaluation using a robotics-assisted tilt table.中风患者心肺适能的重测信度及四周变化:使用机器人辅助倾斜台进行评估
BMC Neurol. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0686-0.
7
Robot-Assisted End-Effector-Based Stair Climbing for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Feasibility, Reliability, and Repeatability.用于心肺运动测试的基于末端执行器的机器人辅助爬楼梯:可行性、可靠性和可重复性。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148932. eCollection 2016.
8
Feasibility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and training using a robotics-assisted tilt table in dependent-ambulatory stroke patients.在依赖他人行走的中风患者中使用机器人辅助倾斜台进行心肺运动测试和训练的可行性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Sep 26;12:88. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0078-5.
9
Efficacy of Feedback-Controlled Robotics-Assisted Treadmill Exercise to Improve Cardiovascular Fitness Early After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.反馈控制机器人辅助跑步机训练对改善卒中后早期心血管适应性的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Jul;39(3):156-65. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000095.
10
Real-time closed-loop control of human heart rate and blood pressure.人体心率和血压的实时闭环控制
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 May;62(5):1434-1442. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2391234. Epub 2015 Jan 13.