Wang Yang, Zhan Shipeng, Du Heyue, Li Jing, Khan Safi U, Aertgeerts Bert, Guyatt Gordon, Hao Qiukui, Bekkering Geertruida, Li Ling, Delvaux Nicolas, Su Na, Riaz Irbaz, Vandvik Per Olav, Tian Haoming, Li Sheyu
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre, and MAGIC China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
BMJ Med. 2022 May 3;1(1):e000134. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000134. eCollection 2022.
To determine the harms of ezetimibe in people who need lipid-lowering treatment.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.
Studies comparing ezetimibe with placebo, standard care, or other lipid-lowering agents in people who need lipid-lowering treatment with a follow-up duration of at least six months (or 24 weeks). The relative effects for potential harms of ezetimibe were pooled by use of random effect pairwise meta-analyses for randomised controlled trials and the evidence from observational studies was narratively summarised. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
48 randomised controlled trials with 28 444 participants (median follow-up 34 weeks, range 24-312 weeks) and four observational studies with 1667 participants (median follow-up 282 weeks, range 72-400 weeks) were included. The meta-analyses of randomised trials showed moderate to high certainty that ezetimibe was not associated with cancer (relative risk 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.11), fractures (0.90; 0.74 to 1.10), discontinuation due to any adverse event (0.87; 0.74 to 1.03), gastrointestinal adverse events leading to discontinuation (1.34; 0.58 to 3.08), myalgia or muscular pain leading to discontinuation (0.82; 0.51 to 1.33), neurocognitive events (1.48; 0.58 to 3.81), or new-onset diabetes (0.88; 0.61 to 1.28). The narrative analysis of observational studies provided consistent findings. No credible subgroup effects were identified for the harm outcomes, including shorter versus longer follow-up duration of trials.
Ezetimibe results in little to no difference in adverse events or other undesirable effects compared with placebo, usual care or other lipid-lowering agents.
PROSPERO CRD42020187437.
确定依折麦布在需要降脂治疗的人群中的危害。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
随机对照试验和队列研究。
在需要降脂治疗的人群中,比较依折麦布与安慰剂、标准治疗或其他降脂药物的研究,随访期至少6个月(或24周)。通过对随机对照试验进行随机效应成对荟萃分析,汇总依折麦布潜在危害的相对效应,并对观察性研究的证据进行叙述性总结。使用推荐评估、制定和评价分级法评估证据的确定性。
纳入48项随机对照试验,共28444名参与者(中位随访34周,范围24 - 312周),以及4项观察性研究,共1667名参与者(中位随访282周,范围72 - 400周)。随机试验的荟萃分析显示,依折麦布与癌症(相对风险1.01;95%置信区间0.92至1.11)、骨折(0.90;0.74至1.10)、因任何不良事件停药(0.87;0.74至1.03)、导致停药的胃肠道不良事件(1.34;0.58至3.08)、导致停药肌痛或肌肉疼痛(0.82;0.51至1.33)、神经认知事件(1.48;0.58至3.81)或新发糖尿病(0.88;0.61至1.28)无关,证据具有中等到高度确定性。观察性研究的叙述性分析提供了一致的结果。未发现危害结局存在可信的亚组效应,包括试验随访期较短与较长的情况。
与安慰剂、常规治疗或其他降脂药物相比,依折麦布在不良事件或其他不良影响方面几乎没有差异或无差异。
PROSPERO CRD42020187437