• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口机器人手术与舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:一项成本分析研究

Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA: A Cost Analysis Study.

作者信息

Mandloi Shreya, Garg Neha, Naimi Bita, Shah Riya, Kaki Praneet, Alnemri Angela, Duffy Alexander, Zhan Tingting, Kaffenberger Thomas M, Boon Maurits S, Huntley Colin T

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2025 Jan;135(1):457-462. doi: 10.1002/lary.31697. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1002/lary.31697
PMID:39136252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) lingual tonsillectomy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) are effective surgical interventions for well-selected patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Previous publications have demonstrated that HGNS patients have a lower postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and length of hospital stay than TORS patients. No prior study has investigated the differences in costs between HGNS and TORS.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare surgery-related costs in patients undergoing HGNS versus TORS lingual tonsillectomy for OSA intolerant to CPAP.

METHODS

A retrospective study on OSA patients intolerant to CPAP that underwent HGNS or TORS from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary care center. Cost was defined as the dollar amount associated with providing a specific service prior to the application of insurance.

RESULTS

This study included 395 patients (375 UAS and 20 TORS). Average total cost was significantly higher in the UAS group than the TORS group (UAS: $25,582.60; TORS: $5832.60; p < 0.001). Operating room costs were also significantly higher in the UAS group (UAS: $1978.20; TORS: $1490.90; p = 0.001). The TORS cohort averaged higher costs for pharmacy (UAS: $201.30; TORS: $416.60; p < 0.001) and anesthesia (UAS: $139.00; TORS: $307.60; p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The total cost was significantly higher in the UAS group compared to the TORS group. When making management decisions, it is important to consider the cost of care provided as well as patient-centered outcomes to optimize the value of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 135:457-462, 2025.

摘要

背景

经口机器人手术(TORS)舌扁桃体切除术和舌下神经刺激术(HGNS)是针对选择恰当的、不耐受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的有效手术干预措施。既往发表的文献表明,与TORS患者相比,HGNS患者术后的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)更低,住院时间更短。此前尚无研究调查HGNS和TORS之间的费用差异。

目的

本研究旨在比较接受HGNS与TORS舌扁桃体切除术治疗的、不耐受CPAP的OSA患者的手术相关费用。

方法

对2015年至2022年在一家三级医疗中心接受HGNS或TORS治疗的不耐受CPAP的OSA患者进行一项回顾性研究。费用定义为在保险应用之前与提供特定服务相关的美元金额。

结果

本研究纳入了395例患者(375例行HGNS和20例行TORS)。HGNS组的平均总费用显著高于TORS组(HGNS组:25582.60美元;TORS组:5832.60美元;p < 0.001)。HGNS组的手术室费用也显著更高(HGNS组:1978.20美元;TORS组:1490.90美元;p = 0.001)。TORS队列的药房费用(HGNS组:201.30美元;TORS组:416.60美元;p < 0.001)和麻醉费用(HGNS组:139.00美元;TORS组:307.60美元;p < 0.001)平均更高。

讨论

HGNS组的总费用显著高于TORS组。在做出管理决策时,重要的是要考虑所提供护理的成本以及以患者为中心的结果,以优化护理价值。

证据级别

NA 《喉镜》,135:457 - 462,2025年。

相似文献

1
Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA: A Cost Analysis Study.经口机器人手术与舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:一项成本分析研究
Laryngoscope. 2025 Jan;135(1):457-462. doi: 10.1002/lary.31697. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Transoral robotic surgery versus upper airway stimulation in select obstructive sleep apnea patients.经口机器人手术与特定阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的上气道刺激治疗对比
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jan;129(1):256-258. doi: 10.1002/lary.27487. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Comparing Upper Airway Stimulation to Transoral Robotic Base of Tongue Resection for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.比较上气道刺激与经口机器人舌根切除术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的效果。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Apr;129(4):1010-1013. doi: 10.1002/lary.27484. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
The Rise of Upper Airway Stimulation in the Era of Transoral Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.经口机器人手术时代中,上气道刺激术的兴起。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;53(6):1017-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
Combination Tonsillectomy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Sleep Apnea Patients With Oropharyngeal Lateral Wall Collapse.联合扁桃体切除术和舌下神经刺激术治疗口咽侧壁塌陷的睡眠呼吸暂停患者。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;171(6):1904-1910. doi: 10.1002/ohn.950. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
6
Treating obstructive sleep apnea with hypoglossal nerve stimulation.舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。
Sleep. 2011 Nov 1;34(11):1479-86. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1380.
7
Transoral Robotic Surgery versus Plasma Ablation for Tongue Base Reduction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Meta-analysis.经口机器人手术与等离子消融治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的舌骨基底缩小术:荟萃分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun;162(6):839-852. doi: 10.1177/0194599820913533. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Therapeutic Positive Airway Pressure Level Predicts Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.治疗性气道正压水平预测舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的反应。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Aug 15;15(8):1165-1172. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7814.
9
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus Hospital.舌下神经刺激器植入术在日间手术中心与医院的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132(3):706-710. doi: 10.1002/lary.29875. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
10
Relationship of Modified Sleep Apnea Severity Index and HGNS Efficacy and Adherence in OSA Patients.改良睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度指数与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的HGNS疗效及依从性的关系。
Laryngoscope. 2025 Mar;135(3):1212-1217. doi: 10.1002/lary.31793. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of single-port TORS tongue base resection for obstructive sleep apnea: safety and patient outcomes.单孔经口机器人手术行舌根切除术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的评估:安全性及患者预后
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 28;19(1):520. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02699-2.
2
The role of positional changes in optimizing OSA treatment: evidence from DISE.体位改变在优化阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗中的作用:来自药物诱导睡眠内镜检查的证据
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;282(5):2709-2717. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09314-y. Epub 2025 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Insomnia on Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in the ADHERE Registry.ADHERE 注册研究中失眠对舌下神经刺激治疗效果的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan;134(1):471-479. doi: 10.1002/lary.30933. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Safety of tongue base procedures for sleep apnoea in adults: A systematic review and metanalysis from the YO-IFOS study group.成人舌基手术治疗睡眠呼吸暂停的安全性:YO-IFOS 研究组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Nov-Dec;73(6):384-393. doi: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.10.004.
3
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.国际阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停共识声明。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Jul;13(7):1061-1482. doi: 10.1002/alr.23079. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Cost of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery.全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停手术中的成本比较。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Jul;132(7):1487-1494. doi: 10.1002/lary.30094. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
TORS as Part of Multilevel Surgery in OSA: The Importance of Careful Patient Selection and Outcomes.悬雍垂腭咽成形术作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停多平面手术的一部分:谨慎选择患者及手术效果的重要性
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 14;11(4):990. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040990.
6
Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与心血管疾病:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2021 Jul 20;144(3):e56-e67. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000988. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
Transoral robotic OSA surgery.经口机器人治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)手术。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Base of Tongue Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Era of Neurostimulation.神经刺激时代下用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的舌根手术
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;53(3):431-443. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Obstructive sleep apnoea and cardiovascular consequences: Pathophysiological mechanisms.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与心血管后果:病理生理机制。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May;113(5):350-358. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Hypoglossal nerve stimulation long-term clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.舌下神经刺激的长期临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Breath. 2020 Jun;24(2):399-411. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01923-2. Epub 2019 Aug 15.