• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发 DIGIFOOD 仪表板以监测地方食品环境的数字化:跨学科方法。

Developing the DIGIFOOD Dashboard to Monitor the Digitalization of Local Food Environments: Interdisciplinary Approach.

机构信息

Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Sydney Informatics Hub, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 13;10:e59924. doi: 10.2196/59924.

DOI:10.2196/59924
PMID:39137032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11350305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online food delivery services (OFDS) enable individuals to conveniently access foods from any deliverable location. The increased accessibility to foods may have implications on the consumption of healthful or unhealthful foods. Concerningly, previous research suggests that OFDS offer an abundance of energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods, which are heavily promoted through deals or discounts.

OBJECTIVE

In this paper, we describe the development of the DIGIFOOD dashboard to monitor the digitalization of local food environments in New South Wales, Australia, resulting from the proliferation of OFDS.

METHODS

Together with a team of data scientists, we designed a purpose-built dashboard using Microsoft Power BI. The development process involved three main stages: (1) data acquisition of food outlets via web scraping, (2) data cleaning and processing, and (3) visualization of food outlets on the dashboard. We also describe the categorization process of food outlets to characterize the healthfulness of local, online, and hybrid food environments. These categories included takeaway franchises, independent takeaways, independent restaurants and cafes, supermarkets or groceries, bakeries, alcohol retailers, convenience stores, and sandwich or salad shops.

RESULTS

To date, the DIGIFOOD dashboard has mapped 36,967 unique local food outlets (locally accessible and scraped from Google Maps) and 16,158 unique online food outlets (accessible online and scraped from Uber Eats) across New South Wales, Australia. In 2023, the market-leading OFDS operated in 1061 unique suburbs or localities in New South Wales. The Sydney-Parramatta region, a major urban area in New South Wales accounting for 28 postcodes, recorded the highest number of online food outlets (n=4221). In contrast, the Far West and Orana region, a rural area in New South Wales with only 2 postcodes, recorded the lowest number of food outlets accessible online (n=7). Urban areas appeared to have the greatest increase in total food outlets accessible via online food delivery. In both local and online food environments, it was evident that independent restaurants and cafes comprised the largest proportion of food outlets at 47.2% (17,437/36,967) and 51.8% (8369/16,158), respectively. However, compared to local food environments, the online food environment has relatively more takeaway franchises (2734/16,158, 16.9% compared to 3273/36,967, 8.9%) and independent takeaway outlets (2416/16,158, 14.9% compared to 4026/36,967, 10.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The DIGIFOOD dashboard leverages the current rich data landscape to display and contrast the availability and healthfulness of food outlets that are locally accessible versus accessible online. The DIGIFOOD dashboard can be a useful monitoring tool for the evolving digital food environment at a regional scale and has the potential to be scaled up at a national level. Future iterations of the dashboard, including data from additional prominent OFDS, can be used by policy makers to identify high-priority areas with limited access to healthful foods both online and locally.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/ff36624d8d79/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/fb570e9d2cca/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/bae752fea7d4/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/d201f1250870/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/4b4b23001fa5/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/67e66eb9b67e/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/ff36624d8d79/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/fb570e9d2cca/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/bae752fea7d4/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/d201f1250870/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/4b4b23001fa5/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/67e66eb9b67e/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e54/11350305/ff36624d8d79/publichealth_v10i1e59924_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

在线食品配送服务(OFDS)使个人能够方便地从任何可配送地点获取食品。食品获取便利性的提高可能会对健康食品和不健康食品的消费产生影响。令人担忧的是,先前的研究表明,OFDS 提供了大量的高能量、低营养的食品,这些食品通过优惠或折扣大量推广。

目的

本文描述了 DIGIFOOD 仪表板的开发,该仪表板用于监测澳大利亚新南威尔士州本地食品环境的数字化,这是由于 OFDS 的普及而导致的。

方法

我们与一个数据科学家团队一起使用 Microsoft Power BI 设计了一个专用的仪表板。开发过程涉及三个主要阶段:(1)通过网络爬虫获取食品店数据,(2)数据清理和处理,以及(3)在仪表板上可视化食品店。我们还描述了食品店的分类过程,以描述本地、在线和混合食品环境的健康程度。这些类别包括外卖连锁店、独立外卖店、独立餐厅和咖啡馆、超市或杂货店、面包店、酒类零售商、便利店和三明治或沙拉店。

结果

截至目前,DIGIFOOD 仪表板已经在澳大利亚新南威尔士州映射了 36967 个独特的本地食品店(本地可访问并从谷歌地图中抓取)和 16158 个独特的在线食品店(在线可访问并从 Uber Eats 中抓取)。2023 年,市场领先的 OFDS 在新南威尔士州的 1061 个独特郊区或地区运营。悉尼-帕拉马塔地区是新南威尔士州的一个主要城区,占 28 个邮政编码,记录了最多的在线食品店(n=4221)。相比之下,新南威尔士州的远西部和奥拉拉地区只有 2 个邮政编码,记录了在线可访问的食品店数量最少(n=7)。城市地区似乎在线食品配送可访问的食品店总数增长最大。在本地和在线食品环境中,独立餐厅和咖啡馆的比例最大,分别为 47.2%(17437/36967)和 51.8%(8369/16158)。然而,与本地食品环境相比,在线食品环境相对有更多的外卖连锁店(2734/16158,16.9%,而 3273/36967,8.9%)和独立外卖店(2416/16158,14.9%,而 4026/36967,10.9%)。

结论

DIGIFOOD 仪表板利用当前丰富的数据环境来显示和对比本地可访问的食品店和在线可访问的食品店的可用性和健康程度。DIGIFOOD 仪表板可以作为区域尺度上不断发展的数字食品环境的有用监测工具,并有可能在国家层面上扩大规模。仪表板的未来版本,包括来自其他主要 OFDS 的数据,可以被政策制定者用来识别在线和本地健康食品获取机会有限的高优先级地区。

相似文献

1
Developing the DIGIFOOD Dashboard to Monitor the Digitalization of Local Food Environments: Interdisciplinary Approach.开发 DIGIFOOD 仪表板以监测地方食品环境的数字化:跨学科方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 13;10:e59924. doi: 10.2196/59924.
2
Measuring the food environment in three rural towns in New South Wales, Australia.测量澳大利亚新南威尔士州三个农村城镇的食物环境。
Health Promot J Austr. 2012 Aug;23(2):129-33. doi: 10.1071/he12129.
3
The evolution of local food environments within established neighbourhoods and new developments in Perth, Western Australia.西澳大利亚州珀斯既有社区和新开发区域内当地食物环境的演变。
Health Place. 2019 May;57:204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Junk Food on Demand: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nutritional Quality of Popular Online Food Delivery Outlets in Australia and New Zealand.随需 Junk 食品:澳大利亚和新西兰流行在线送餐服务网点食物营养质量的横断面分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 12;12(10):3107. doi: 10.3390/nu12103107.
5
Geographic reach and nutritional quality of foods available from mobile online food delivery service applications: novel opportunities for retail food environment surveillance.移动在线食品配送服务应用程序可获取的食品的地理覆盖范围和营养质量:零售食品环境监测的新机会。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10489-2.
6
Associations between online food outlet access and online food delivery service use amongst adults in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of linked data.英国成年人中在线食品店可达性与在线食品配送服务使用之间的关联:基于关联数据的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 31;21(1):1968. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11953-9.
7
Food Outlets Dietary Risk (FODR) assessment tool: study protocol for assessing the public health nutrition risks of community food environments.食品销售点饮食风险(FODR)评估工具:评估社区食品环境公共健康营养风险的研究方案。
Nutr J. 2020 Nov 12;19(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00641-w.
8
Retrospective analysis of regional and metropolitan school food environments using Google Street View: A case study in New South Wales, Australia with youth consultation.利用谷歌街景对地区和大都市学校食品环境进行回顾性分析:以澳大利亚新南威尔士州为例并咨询青少年意见
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e930. doi: 10.1002/hpja.930. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
9
Correlates of English local government use of the planning system to regulate hot food takeaway outlets: a cross-sectional analysis.与英国地方政府利用规划系统来监管热食外卖店相关的因素:一项横断面分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 9;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0884-4.
10
Changes in Online Food Access During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associations With Deprivation: Longitudinal Analysis.新冠疫情期间在线食品获取的变化及其与贫困的关联:纵向分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 17;9:e41822. doi: 10.2196/41822.

引用本文的文献

1
The emergence of meal delivery applications: a research agenda to advance the next decade of progress in nutrition.送餐应用的出现:推进未来十年营养进步的研究议程。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1038/s41430-025-01597-y.
2
Assessing socioeconomic disparities in emerging hybrid food environments: a cross-sectional analysis of the DIGIFOOD dashboard.评估新兴混合食品环境中的社会经济差异:DIGIFOOD 仪表盘的横断面分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Feb 27;56:101504. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101504. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The Digital Revolution in the Bakery Sector: Innovations, Challenges, and Opportunities from Industry 4.0.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking online food delivery applications against menu labelling laws: a cross-sectional observational analysis.对标菜单标签法规的在线食品配送应用程序的基准测试:一项横断面观察性分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Apr 1;27(1):e101. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000673.
2
The Development and Potential of a Digital out of Home Food Environment Monitoring Platform.数字户外食品环境监测平台的发展与潜力
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 6;15(18):3887. doi: 10.3390/nu15183887.
3
Availability of calorie information on online menus from chain restaurants in the USA: current prevalence and legal landscape.
烘焙行业的数字革命:工业4.0带来的创新、挑战与机遇
Foods. 2025 Feb 6;14(3):526. doi: 10.3390/foods14030526.
美国连锁餐厅在线菜单中卡路里信息的提供情况:当前的流行趋势和法律状况。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3239-3246. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001799. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Availability of calorie information on online food delivery service platforms among major chain restaurants in Canadian provinces with different calorie labelling policies.加拿大各省不同卡路里标签政策下主要连锁餐厅在线送餐服务平台上提供卡路里信息的情况。
Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):983-991. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00788-z. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Observational study of population level disparities in food costs in 2021 in Canada: A digital national nutritious food basket (dNNFB).2021年加拿大食品成本的人群水平差异观察性研究:数字国家营养食品篮(dNNFB)
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 23;32:102162. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102162. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Nutritional Content of Popular Menu Items from Online Food Delivery Applications in Bangkok, Thailand: Are They Healthy?泰国曼谷在线送餐应用中热门菜单项目的营养成分:它们健康吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053992.
7
Nutritional quality and consumer health perception of online delivery food in the context of China.中国在线外卖食品的营养质量和消费者健康感知。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):2132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14593-9.
8
Food Outlet Access and the Healthiness of Food Available 'On-Demand' via Meal Delivery Apps in New Zealand.新西兰通过送餐应用程序“按需”获取食物的食品销售点渠道和可得食物的健康度。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 11;14(20):4228. doi: 10.3390/nu14204228.
9
The impact of the consumer and neighbourhood food environment on dietary intake and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review of causal impact studies.消费者和社区食品环境对饮食摄入和肥胖相关结果的影响:因果关系影响研究的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;299:114879. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114879. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
10
Food and Nutrition Systems Dashboards: A Systematic Review.食品与营养系统仪表盘:一项系统综述。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Jun 1;13(3):748-757. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac022.