• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从规定动力学角度对海森堡诠释的重新解读。

A reinterpretation of Heisenberg's Umdeutung in prescriptive-dynamical terms.

机构信息

Independent Scholar, 7464 Bigtooth Maple Drive, Colorado Springs, CO 80925, USA.

出版信息

Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2024 Oct;107:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.07.002
PMID:39137533
Abstract

There has been a lot of discussion about Heisenberg's Umdeutung paper of 1925, which is universally credited as the first formulation of modern quantum mechanics. Much of this discussion has been characterized by puzzlement over the manner in which Heisenberg arrived at his formulation, supposedly through Bohr's atomic theory in conjunction with two philosophical principles, namely the Correspondence Principle and the Observability Principle. I provide textual, contextual, and philosophical evidence that the "prescriptive-dynamical framework" - recently advocated in the literature on independent grounds - is the perfect perspective from which to understand Heisenberg's work and the significance of the two principles he utilized to arrive at it.

摘要

关于海森堡 1925 年的“诠释性论文”已经有很多讨论,普遍认为这是现代量子力学的第一个表述。其中大部分讨论都对海森堡提出他的表述的方式感到困惑,据说这是通过玻尔的原子理论与两个哲学原则结合起来的,即对应原理和可观测性原理。我提供了文本、上下文和哲学证据,表明“规定性动力学框架”——最近在关于独立依据的文献中被提倡——是理解海森堡的工作以及他用来得出这一结论的两个原则的意义的完美视角。

相似文献

1
A reinterpretation of Heisenberg's Umdeutung in prescriptive-dynamical terms.从规定动力学角度对海森堡诠释的重新解读。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2024 Oct;107:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Is the Devil in ?魔鬼在……里面吗?
Entropy (Basel). 2021 May 19;23(5):632. doi: 10.3390/e23050632.
3
In the name of science: don't tamper with the deceptive truth..以科学之名:切勿篡改欺骗性真相。
Mini Rev Med Chem. 2009 Dec;9(14):1676-7. doi: 10.2174/138955709791012256.
4
Violation of Heisenberg's measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements.弱测量违反海森堡的测量-干扰关系。
Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Sep 7;109(10):100404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.100404. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
5
Verifying Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation using a single trapped ion.使用单个囚禁离子验证海森堡测不准关系。
Sci Adv. 2016 Oct 21;2(10):e1600578. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600578. eCollection 2016 Oct.
6
Process and Impact of Niels Bohr's Visit to Japan and China in 1937: A Comparative Perspective.1937年尼尔斯·玻尔访日与访华的过程及影响:比较视角
Endeavour. 2017 Mar;41(1):12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
The cognitive nexus between Bohr's analogy for the atom and Pauli's exclusion schema.玻尔的原子模型类比与泡利不相容原理之间的认知关联。
Endeavour. 2016 Mar;40(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Incorporating Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle into Quantum Multiparameter Estimation.将海森堡不确定性原理纳入量子多参数估计。
Phys Rev Lett. 2021 Mar 26;126(12):120503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.120503.
9
Uncertainties.不确定性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Sep;16(3):479-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9180-z.
10
[Two traditions in the scientific learning of the world. A case study of creation and reception of quantum mechanics over the period 1925-1927, on the bases of discussion between Werner Heisenberg and Albert Einstein].[科学世界观中的两种传统。以维尔纳·海森堡与阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦之间的讨论为基础,对1925年至1927年间量子力学的创立与接受情况进行的案例研究]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2014;59(3):7-36.