Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 机械通气患者延长俯卧位与 90 天死亡率。

Extended Prone Position and 90-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain; and Hospital La Paz Health Research Institute (IdiPaz), Madrid, Spain.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara Spain.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2024 Sep 26;69(10):1255-1265. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11622.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prone positioning (PP) has demonstrated its potential for improving outcomes in patients with ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the ability of prolonged proning to reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 specifically, sessions lasting > 24 h remains uncertain.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 158 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation due to moderate-to-severe ARDS. Seventy-six subjects were placed in standard PP and 82 in extended PP, defined as prone sessions lasting at least 32 h. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of EPP on 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 with acute severe respiratory failure. To ensure the reliability of our findings and to minimize bias, we applied 3 adjustment approaches: cardinality matching (CM), matching weighting (MW), and inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized and trimmed weights (SW). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the effects of EPP on 90-d mortality and sensitivity analysis by calculating E-values.

RESULTS

The overall crude 90-d mortality rate was 31.7%. The unadjusted 90-d mortality rates were 19.5% in the EPP group and 44.7% in the SPP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63], < .001). After adjustment for confounding factors using CM, MW, and SW, baseline covariates were balanced between the 2 groups. Subjects in the EPP group exhibited lower 90-d mortality rates after adjustment using CM (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79], = .007), MW (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95], = .036), or SW (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56], < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended PP was associated with improved 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation for severe ARDS. These findings suggest the potential benefit of EPP in the management of COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association.

摘要

背景

俯卧位通气(PP)已被证明对需要有创机械通气的 ARDS 患者的预后有改善作用。然而,俯卧位时间延长(>24 小时)是否能降低 COVID-19 患者的死亡率,特别是对于 COVID-19 患者,其效果仍不确定。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 158 例因中重度 ARDS 而需要机械通气的 COVID-19 肺炎患者。76 例患者接受标准俯卧位通气(PP),82 例患者接受延长俯卧位通气(EPP),定义为俯卧位时间至少 32 小时。我们的主要目的是评估 EPP 对急性严重呼吸衰竭的 COVID-19 患者 90 天生存率的影响。为了确保研究结果的可靠性并尽量减少偏倚,我们应用了 3 种调整方法:基数匹配(CM)、匹配加权(MW)和使用稳定和修剪权重的治疗反概率加权(SW)。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 比例风险模型来分析 EPP 对 90 天死亡率的影响,并通过计算 E 值进行敏感性分析。

结果

总体粗死亡率为 31.7%。未校正的 90 天死亡率在 EPP 组为 19.5%,在 SPP 组为 44.7%(风险比 [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19-0.63],<.001)。在使用 CM、MW 和 SW 调整混杂因素后,两组之间的基线协变量得到平衡。在使用 CM(HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79],=.007)、MW(HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95],=.036)或 SW(HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56],<.001)校正后,EPP 组的 90 天死亡率较低。

结论

对于因严重 ARDS 而接受机械通气的 COVID-19 患者,EPP 与 90 天生存率的提高相关。这些发现提示 EPP 在 COVID-19 相关呼吸衰竭管理中的潜在益处。需要进一步的研究和前瞻性研究来证实并阐明这种关联的潜在机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验