Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02674-8.
Carotid endarterectomy is performed for patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusions. Surgery can be performed under general and regional anesthesia. Traditionally, surgery is performed under deep cervical plexus block which is technically difficult to perform and can cause serious complications. This case series describes 5 cases in which an intermediate cervical plexus block was used in combination with a superficial cervical plexus block for Carotid endarterectomy surgery.
Five patients who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists 2-3 were scheduled for Carotid endarterectomy due to symptoms and more than 70% occlusion of the carotid arteries. The procedures were carried out in the University Teaching Hospital- Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. All patients were given superficial cervical plexus block followed by intermediate cervical plexus block using 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine.
Adequate anesthesia was achieved in 4 patients, and local infiltration was necessary in 1 patient. Two patients developed hoarseness of the voice, which settled 2 h after surgery. Hemodynamic fluctuations were observed in all 5 patients. No serious complications were observed. All 5 patients had uneventful recoveries.
Regional anesthesia for CEA is preferable in patients who are medically complicated to undergo anesthesia or in patients for whom cerebral monitoring is not available. Intermediate cervical plexus block is described for thyroid surgeries in literature, but not much details on its use for carotid surgeries. Deep cervical plexus blocks has few serious complications which is not there with the use of ICPB making it a good alternative for CEA surgeries .
Superficial cervical plexus block and intermediate cervical plexus block can be used effectively for providing anesthesia for patients undergoing Carotid endarterectomy. It is safe and easier to conduct than deep cervical plexus block and enables monitoring of cerebral function.
颈动脉内膜切除术用于治疗有症状的颈动脉闭塞患者。手术可在全身麻醉和局部麻醉下进行。传统上,手术在深颈丛阻滞下进行,操作技术难度大,且可能导致严重并发症。本病例系列描述了 5 例在颈动脉内膜切除术中使用中颈丛阻滞联合浅颈丛阻滞的病例。
5 例美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级 2-3 级的患者因症状和颈动脉超过 70%闭塞而接受颈动脉内膜切除术。手术在斯里兰卡佩拉德尼亚大学教学医院进行。所有患者均接受浅颈丛阻滞,然后使用 2%利多卡因和 0.5%布比卡因行中颈丛阻滞。
4 例患者获得了足够的麻醉效果,1 例患者需要局部浸润麻醉。2 例患者出现声音嘶哑,术后 2 小时缓解。所有 5 例患者均出现血流动力学波动。无严重并发症发生。所有 5 例患者均顺利恢复。
对于那些因医学原因难以接受麻醉或无法进行脑监测的患者,CEA 的区域麻醉更为可取。中颈丛阻滞在甲状腺手术中已有描述,但关于其在颈动脉手术中应用的细节较少。深颈丛阻滞有一些严重的并发症,而使用 ICPB 则没有这些并发症,因此它是 CEA 手术的一个很好的替代方法。
浅颈丛阻滞联合中颈丛阻滞可有效用于行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者提供麻醉。它比深颈丛阻滞更安全、更容易操作,并能监测脑功能。