• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用威慑推动策略促进大学环境中楼梯的使用。

Applying a deterrence nudge strategy for promoting stair usage in a university setting.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, College of Education. 71-1, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

Institute of Sport Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):2195. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19592-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19592-6
PMID:39138467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11321217/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine whether indirectly deterring elevator use through time-targeted Point-of-Decision Prompts (PODPs) efficiently increased stair usage in a university setting.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design (pre-post design) was employed over 2 weeks in September 2023. Baseline observations were conducted for 1 week prior to signage placement at two locations. The intervention in this study lasted for 1 week, immediately following baseline observations. Three hundred and thirty-one and 384 participants were observed during the baseline and intervention periods, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the increase in the act of ascending the stairs.

RESULTS

Our intervention, which focused on time-related messages, effectively increased stair usage among university students (coefficient = 0.435, p-value < 0.01). Furthermore, females (coefficient = -0.820, p-value < 0.05) and individuals aged ≥ 30 years (coefficient = 1.048, p-value < 0.01) were notably more likely to be influenced by our intervention than males and individuals aged < 30 years.

CONCLUSION

Indirectly discouraging elevator use through time-targeted PODPs may amplify the effects of the previously employed time-related messages. Our findings suggested that a deterrence nudge should primarily be directed towards promoting stair usage among females or individuals aged ≥ 30 years.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验通过时间导向的决策点提示(PODP)间接阻止使用电梯是否能有效地增加大学环境中的楼梯使用。

方法

在 2023 年 9 月,采用了准实验设计(前后设计),在两个地点进行了为期两周的 signage 放置前的基线观察。本研究的干预持续了一周,紧接着基线观察之后。分别有 331 名和 384 名参与者在基线和干预期间被观察。使用逻辑回归分析来检验爬楼梯行为的增加。

结果

我们的干预措施集中在与时间相关的信息上,有效地增加了大学生的楼梯使用(系数=0.435,p 值<0.01)。此外,女性(系数=-0.820,p 值<0.05)和年龄≥30 岁的个体(系数=1.048,p 值<0.01)比男性和年龄<30 岁的个体更受我们干预措施的影响。

结论

通过时间导向的 PODP 间接阻止使用电梯可能会放大先前使用的与时间相关的信息的效果。我们的研究结果表明,遏制措施应该主要针对促进女性或年龄≥30 岁的个体使用楼梯。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/3221fe49f573/12889_2024_19592_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/ee4a4a503d9d/12889_2024_19592_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/770212af232d/12889_2024_19592_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/3221fe49f573/12889_2024_19592_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/ee4a4a503d9d/12889_2024_19592_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/770212af232d/12889_2024_19592_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3668/11321217/3221fe49f573/12889_2024_19592_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Applying a deterrence nudge strategy for promoting stair usage in a university setting.应用威慑推动策略促进大学环境中楼梯的使用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):2195. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19592-6.
2
Point-of-Decision Signs and Stair Use in a University Worksite Setting: General Versus Specific Messages.大学工作场所环境中的决策点标识与楼梯使用:通用信息与特定信息
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):291-3. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120816-ARB-398. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: what about escalator climbers?在楼梯和自动扶梯之间的选择点增加身体活动的提示:那自动扶梯攀爬者呢?
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):656-662. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby080.
4
A Multicomponent Intervention to Encourage Stair Use in Municipal Buildings.鼓励在市政建筑中使用楼梯的多组分干预措施。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):57-69. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776893. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Using signage to promote stair use on a university campus in hidden and visible stairwells.利用标识在隐蔽和可见楼梯间促进大学内楼梯的使用。
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7(2):232-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.2.232.
6
A longitudinal controlled signage intervention to increase stair use at university buildings: Process and impact evaluation using RE-AIM framework.一项旨在增加大学建筑楼梯使用的纵向对照标识干预措施:使用 RE-AIM 框架进行的过程和影响评估。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1079241. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079241. eCollection 2023.
7
Motivational signage increases stair usage on a Hispanic serving institution.激励性标识提高了西班牙裔服务机构的楼梯使用率。
J Am Coll Health. 2020 Apr;68(3):236-241. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1539000. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Step It UP: a multicomponent intervention to increase stair use in a university residence building.Step It UP:一项在大学宿舍大楼中增加楼梯使用的多组分干预措施。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(1):2-5. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.091106-ARB-357.
9
Does a video displaying a stair climbing model increase stair use in a worksite setting?视频展示爬楼梯模型能否增加工作场所的楼梯使用?
Public Health. 2017 Aug;149:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Promoting Stair Climbing in a Worksite and Public Setting: Are Footprints Enough?在工作场所和公共场所推广爬楼梯:脚印就足够了吗?
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):527-535. doi: 10.1177/0890117117694284. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
How do different interventions impact stair climbing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同干预措施如何影响爬楼梯?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2022 Jun 23:17579759221093388. doi: 10.1177/17579759221093388.
2
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stair Use.增加楼梯使用的干预措施的系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
3
Point-of-Decision Signs and Stair Use in a University Worksite Setting: General Versus Specific Messages.大学工作场所环境中的决策点标识与楼梯使用:通用信息与特定信息
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):291-3. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120816-ARB-398. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
4
Effects of stair-climbing on balance, gait, strength, resting heart rate, and submaximal endurance in healthy seniors.爬楼梯对健康老年人平衡、步态、力量、静息心率和亚最大耐力的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):e93-101. doi: 10.1111/sms.12113. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
5
Promoting physical activity in a low socioeconomic area: results from an intervention targeting stair climbing.促进低社会经济地区的身体活动:针对爬楼梯的干预措施的结果。
Prev Med. 2011 May;52(5):352-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
6
Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior.久坐行为的人群健康科学:坐得太久了。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
7
Stairs instead of elevators at workplace: cardioprotective effects of a pragmatic intervention.工作场所用楼梯代替电梯:一项实用干预措施的心脏保护作用
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):569-75. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328338a4dd.
8
Point-of-decision prompts to increase stair use. A systematic review update.促进楼梯使用的决策点提示。系统评价更新。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.028.
9
The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender.亲社会性行为的男女性别差异:社会心理学视角下的性别研究。
Am Psychol. 2009 Nov;64(8):644-58. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644.
10
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults.美国运动医学学院立场声明:老年人运动与体育锻炼。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95c.