• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

权衡你的选择——胃内球囊与司美格鲁肽。

Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17Th Ave, C-305, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Rocky Mountain Regional Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6070-6075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11169-z. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11169-z
PMID:39138683
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over half of Americans and up to 78% of US Veteran population meet criteria for obesity. Perioperatively placed intragastric balloon (IGB) can accelerate weight loss goals for safe surgical candidacy, however weight regain is common after removal. Glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP1RA) may provide a more sustainable weight loss solution after surgery. We hypothesize that weight regain will be less at 1 year after initiation of GLP1RA than IGB placement in Veterans.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospective databases of perioperatively placed intragastric balloon cohort from 1/2019-1/2023 compared to patients who received initiatory GLP1RA from 6/2021-8/2022 at a VA Medical Center(VAMC). All patients were enrolled in the VAMC MOVE! multidisciplinary weight management program for a minimum of 12 weeks. Outcomes measured were patients' weights at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months and weight change for these intervals. Exclusion criteria included history of bariatric surgery and incomplete weight loss data.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 110 (49%) patients excluded. Mean age was 54 ± 11 years, the majority (78, 69%) were male, and the mean initial BMI was 37 ± 5.9 kg/m. Seventeen (15%) patients underwent IGB placement and 96 (85%) patients received semaglutide. Weight (kg) change was measured at intervals: 0-3 months:- 11.8(- 17,- 9.5) IGB vs. - 5.1(- 7.4,- 2.3) semaglutide, p < 0.0001; 0-6 months:- 12.7(- 18.4,- 9.9) vs. - 9.4(- 12.6,- 6.1), p = 0.03; 3-6 months:- 0.5(- 2.3,2.3) vs. - 4.3(- 6.8,- 1.6), p < 0.0001; 6-12 months:3(0,7.3) vs. - 1.9(- 4.7,1), p = 0.0006.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss occurs more rapidly in the first 6 months after intragastric balloon placement compared to semaglutide (- 12.7 vs. - 9.4 kg, p = 0.03). Despite ongoing attendance in a comprehensive weight loss program, weight regain is common after IGB removal by an average of 3 kg (23.6%) at 1 year. In contrast, patients on GLP1RA (semaglutide) continue to lose weight during this period. Further studies are needed to determine if optimal long-term outcomes may result from combination therapy with intragastric balloon and semaglutide.

摘要

介绍

超过一半的美国人和高达 78%的美国退伍军人符合肥胖标准。围手术期放置的胃内球囊(IGB)可以加速安全手术候选者的减肥目标,但在移除后体重会重新增加。胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP1RA)可能为手术后提供更可持续的减肥解决方案。我们假设 GLP1RA 治疗组的体重恢复会比 IGB 治疗组少。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月间围手术期放置胃内球囊队列的前瞻性数据库,与 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 8 月间在退伍军人事务部医疗中心(VAMC)接受初始 GLP1RA 治疗的患者进行比较。所有患者都参加了 VAMC 的 MOVE!多学科体重管理计划至少 12 周。测量的结果是患者在 0、3、6 和 12 个月时的体重和这些时间段的体重变化。排除标准包括减肥手术史和不完整的减肥数据。

结果

223 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 110 名(49%)患者被排除。平均年龄为 54±11 岁,大多数(78 名,69%)为男性,平均初始 BMI 为 37±5.9kg/m。17 名(15%)患者接受了 IGB 治疗,96 名(85%)患者接受了司美格鲁肽治疗。体重(kg)变化在不同时间点测量:0-3 个月:-11.8(-17,-9.5)IGB 与-5.1(-7.4,-2.3)司美格鲁肽,p<0.0001;0-6 个月:-12.7(-18.4,-9.9)与-9.4(-12.6,-6.1),p=0.03;3-6 个月:-0.5(-2.3,2.3)与-4.3(-6.8,-1.6),p<0.0001;6-12 个月:3(0,7.3)与-1.9(-4.7,1),p=0.0006。

结论

与司美格鲁肽(-12.7 比-9.4kg,p=0.03)相比,胃内球囊放置后前 6 个月体重下降更快。尽管持续参加全面的减肥计划,但在 IGB 移除后平均体重会重新增加 3kg(23.6%),1 年后体重恢复。相比之下,接受 GLP1RA(司美格鲁肽)治疗的患者在此期间继续减肥。需要进一步的研究来确定胃内球囊和司美格鲁肽联合治疗是否会带来更好的长期效果。

相似文献

1
Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide.权衡你的选择——胃内球囊与司美格鲁肽。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6070-6075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11169-z. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
3
Obesity and Schizophrenia: Results of a Feasibility Study with Semaglutide to Assist Weight Loss.肥胖与精神分裂症:司美格鲁肽辅助减肥的可行性研究结果
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03261-0.
4
Indirect comparative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 2.4 mg for the management of obesity and overweight in patients with type 2 diabetes.替尔泊肽10毫克和15毫克与司美格鲁肽2.4毫克治疗2型糖尿病患者肥胖和超重的间接比较疗效与安全性
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16508.
5
Real-World Weight Loss Among Patients Initiating Semaglutide 2.4 mg and Enrolled in WeGoTogether, a Digital Self-Support Application.启动司美格鲁肽2.4毫克并注册使用数字自助应用程序WeGoTogether的患者的真实世界体重减轻情况。
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03325-1.
6
Intragastric Balloon for Treatment of Overweight and Obesity: Which Is the Best Filling Volume? A Single-Center Randomized Study.胃内球囊治疗超重和肥胖:最佳填充量是多少?一项单中心随机研究。
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08145-4.
7
Intragastric balloon for obesity.用于治疗肥胖症的胃内气球
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD004931. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004931.pub2.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Sleeve-to-bypass conversion vs. sleeve-with-adjuvant GLP-1 receptor agonists: an academic multicenter retrospective study.袖状胃切除术转旁路手术与袖状胃切除术联合辅助胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂:一项多中心学术回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11942-8.
10
Real-World Weight Loss Observed With Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients with Overweight or Obesity and Without Type 2 Diabetes (SHAPE).司美格鲁肽和替尔泊肽在超重或肥胖且无2型糖尿病患者中的真实世界体重减轻情况(SHAPE研究)
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03340-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity Management in Adults: A Review.成人肥胖管理:综述。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):2000-2015. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19897.
2
Losing weight to achieve joint or hernia surgery: is the intragastric balloon the answer?减重以实现关节或疝气手术:胃内球囊是答案吗?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7212-7217. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10209-4. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Beyond Weight Loss: Added Benefits Could Guide the Choice of Anti-Obesity Medications.超越减肥:附加益处或可指导抗肥胖药物的选择。
Curr Obes Rep. 2023 Jun;12(2):127-146. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00502-7. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Obesity treatment initiation, retention, and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs MOVE! Program among rural and urban veterans.退伍军人事务部“行动起来!”计划中农村和城市退伍军人的肥胖症治疗启动、维持情况及治疗效果
Obes Sci Pract. 2022 Jun 8;8(6):784-793. doi: 10.1002/osp4.622. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Obesity stigma and its impact on health: A narrative review.肥胖污名及其对健康的影响:叙事性综述。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2022 Dec;69(10):868-877. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
6
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Diabetes in the US.在美国糖尿病患者中,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂使用的种族、民族和社会经济不平等现象。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 17;2(12):e214182. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4182. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Once-Weekly Semaglutide for Weight Management: A Clinical Review.用于体重管理的每周一次司美格鲁肽:一项临床综述。
J Pharm Technol. 2022 Aug;38(4):239-246. doi: 10.1177/87551225221092681. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Sex Differences in Response to Treatment with Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists: Opportunities for a Tailored Approach to Diabetes and Obesity Care.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗反应中的性别差异:糖尿病和肥胖症个性化护理的机遇
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 13;12(3):454. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030454.
9
Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity.司美格鲁肽用于治疗肥胖症。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr;33(3):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
10
Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial.持续每周皮下注射司美格鲁肽与安慰剂对超重或肥胖成年人体重维持的影响:STEP 4 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1414-1425. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3224.