• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙裔人群在就医行为和决策偏好方面的差异:跨种族/族裔、社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类型的比较研究。

Disparities in Healthcare-Seeking Behavior and Decision Preference Among Hispanics: A Comparative Study Across Races/Ethnicities, SES, and Provider Types.

作者信息

Lin Cheryl, Mella-Velazquez Alejandra, Braund Wendy E, Tu Pikuei

机构信息

Policy and Organizational Management Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 8;17:3849-3862. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S476285. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S476285
PMID:39139698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11319094/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Hispanics, the largest minority in America, have increased risk of several medical issues and face noteworthy health disparities. This study compares care-seeking behaviors and choice experience among Hispanics, Asians, Blacks, and Whites, considering SES (income, education, and insurance status) and across five healthcare provider (HCP) types. Concurrent analysis provides a comprehensive view of how and where inequity manifests in healthcare.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey assessed 1485 adults (Hispanic=314, Asian=313, Black=316, White=542, recruited through a panel agency) of the frequency of visiting primary care providers, dentists, optometrists, gynecologists, and specialists for chronic conditions. Participants also rated the importance of self-selecting a HCP and difficulty in finding one.

RESULTS

Whites visited each HCP most regularly. Compared to Asians, more Hispanics saw specialists regularly (45.1% vs 56.5%, p=0.042), and Blacks saw dentists less (47.0% vs 38.3%, p=0.028) and gynecologists more often (21.2% vs 33.1%, p=0.024). No other frequency differences were observed among minorities. Low-income participants across four races saw dentists and gynecologists with comparable infrequency. Hispanics and Asians assigned similarly significantly lower self-choice importance and experienced more difficulty relative to Whites or Blacks. Participants with lower income or education visited HCPs less regularly yet perceived the same choice importance as higher-SES peers (p>0.05). Notably, discrepancies in visit frequency between Whites and minorities were more pronounced in higher-SES than lower-SES group. Differences in experiencing care-seeking difficulty were associated with income (p=0.029) and insurance type (p=0.009) but not education (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher income and education increase healthcare utilization; however, racial disparities persist, particularly among higher-SES groups. Despite similarities among minorities, the extent of disparities varied by SES and provider type. The findings help explain evident inequity in healthcare access and health outcomes. Tailored patient education, culturally-specific navigation support, and more inclusive services are needed to address barriers faced by minorities and disadvantaged populations.

摘要

目的

西班牙裔是美国最大的少数族裔,面临多种健康问题的风险增加,且存在显著的健康差距。本研究比较了西班牙裔、亚裔、黑人和白人在考虑社会经济地位(收入、教育和保险状况)以及五种医疗服务提供者(HCP)类型时的就医行为和选择体验。同时进行的分析全面呈现了医疗保健中不公平现象的表现方式和地点。

方法

一项横断面在线调查评估了1485名成年人(通过一个专门机构招募,西班牙裔=314人,亚裔=313人,黑人=316人,白人=542人)看初级保健医生、牙医、验光师、妇科医生以及因慢性病看专科医生的频率。参与者还对自主选择医疗服务提供者的重要性以及寻找医疗服务提供者的难度进行了评分。

结果

白人看各类医疗服务提供者的频率最高。与亚裔相比,更多西班牙裔经常看专科医生(45.1%对56.5%,p = 0.042),黑人看牙医的频率较低(47.0%对38.3%,p = 0.028),看妇科医生的频率较高(21.2%对33.1%,p = 0.024)。在少数族裔之间未观察到其他频率差异。四个种族的低收入参与者看牙医和妇科医生的频率相当低。西班牙裔和亚裔相对于白人和黑人,自主选择的重要性显著较低,且遇到的困难更多。收入或教育程度较低的参与者看医疗服务提供者的频率较低,但他们认为选择的重要性与社会经济地位较高的同龄人相同(p > 0.05)。值得注意的是,白人和少数族裔在就诊频率上的差异在社会经济地位较高的群体中比在社会经济地位较低的群体中更为明显。寻求医疗服务困难程度的差异与收入(p = 0.029)和保险类型(p = 对于西班牙裔、亚裔、黑人和白人,考虑社会经济地位(收入、教育和保险状况)以及五种医疗服务提供者(HCP)类型时的就医行为和选择体验。同时进行的分析全面呈现了医疗保健中不公平现象的表现方式和地点。

方法

一项横断面在线调查评估了1485名成年人(通过一个专门机构招募,西班牙裔=314人,亚裔=313人,黑人=316人,白人=542人)看初级保健医生、牙医、验光师、妇科医生以及因慢性病看专科医生的频率。参与者还对自主选择医疗服务提供者的重要性以及寻找医疗服务提供者的难度进行了评分。

结果

白人看各类医疗服务提供者的频率最高。与亚裔相比,更多西班牙裔经常看专科医生(45.1%对56.5%,p = 0.042),黑人看牙医的频率较低(47.0%对38.3%,p = 0.028),看妇科医生的频率较高(21.2%对33.1%,p = 0.024)。在少数族裔之间未观察到其他频率差异。四个种族的低收入参与者看牙医和妇科医生的频率相当低。西班牙裔和亚裔相对于白人和黑人,自主选择的重要性显著较低,且遇到的困难更多。收入或教育程度较低的参与者看医疗服务提供者的频率较低,但他们认为选择的重要性与社会经济地位较高的同龄人相同(p > 0.05)。值得注意的是,白人和少数族裔在就诊频率上的差异在社会经济地位较高的群体中比在社会经济地位较低的群体中更为明显。寻求医疗服务困难程度的差异与收入(p = 0.029)和保险类型(p = 0.009)相关,但与教育程度无关(p > 0.05)。

结论

较高的收入和教育水平会增加医疗保健利用率;然而,种族差异仍然存在,尤其是在社会经济地位较高的群体中。尽管少数族裔之间存在相似之处,但差异程度因社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类型而异。这些发现有助于解释医疗保健获取和健康结果方面明显的不公平现象。需要针对性的患者教育、特定文化的就医指导支持以及更具包容性的服务,以解决少数族裔和弱势群体面临的障碍。 0.009)相关,但与教育程度无关(p > 0.05)。

结论

较高的收入和教育水平会增加医疗保健利用率;然而,种族差异仍然存在,尤其是在社会经济地位较高的群体中。尽管少数族裔之间存在相似之处,但差异程度因社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类型而异。这些发现有助于解释医疗保健获取和健康结果方面明显的不公平现象。需要针对性的患者教育、特定文化的就医指导支持以及更具包容性的服务,以解决少数族裔和弱势群体面临的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0349/11319094/1cb8f3b1809c/JMDH-17-3849-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0349/11319094/508e7949f0a7/JMDH-17-3849-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0349/11319094/1cb8f3b1809c/JMDH-17-3849-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0349/11319094/508e7949f0a7/JMDH-17-3849-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0349/11319094/1cb8f3b1809c/JMDH-17-3849-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities in Healthcare-Seeking Behavior and Decision Preference Among Hispanics: A Comparative Study Across Races/Ethnicities, SES, and Provider Types.西班牙裔人群在就医行为和决策偏好方面的差异:跨种族/族裔、社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类型的比较研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 8;17:3849-3862. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S476285. eCollection 2024.
2
Potential Health Implications of Medication Therapy Management Eligibility Criteria in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.《平价医疗法案》中药物治疗管理资格标准对不同种族和族裔群体的潜在健康影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Nov;21(11):993-1003. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.993.
3
Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance.尽管有医疗保险和医疗补助保险,但社会经济地位对乳腺癌生存的差异。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):706-754. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12355.
4
Race and health profiles in the United States: an examination of the social gradient through the 2009 CHIS adult survey.美国的种族与健康概况:通过2009年加州健康访谈调查成人版审视社会梯度
Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1076-86. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.按种族和族裔划分的特定州选定健康行为的患病率——行为风险因素监测系统,1997年
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 24;49(2):1-60.
6
Racial disparities in prescription drug use for mental illness among population in US.美国人群中用于治疗精神疾病的处方药使用方面的种族差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Sep;8(3):131-43.
7
Cross-sectional study of food insecurity and medical expenditures by race and ethnicity.横断面研究种族和民族的粮食不安全与医疗支出的关系。
Ethn Health. 2023 Jul;28(5):794-808. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2161090. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
The residential segregation patterns of whites by socioeconomic status, 2000-2011.2000-2011 年按社会经济地位划分的白人居住隔离模式。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jul;42(4):1046-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
9
Racial disparities in health among nonpoor African Americans and Hispanics: The role of acute and chronic discrimination.非贫困非裔美国人和西班牙裔人群健康的种族差异:急性和慢性歧视的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.051. Epub 2017 May 6.
10
Surveillance of health status in minority communities - Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) Risk Factor Survey, United States, 2009.少数民族社区健康状况监测 - 美国全民族族裔社区健康方法(REACH US)风险因素调查,2009 年美国。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 May 20;60(6):1-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Perceived Racial Discrimination While Receiving Medical Care in the United States.在美国接受医疗护理时与感知到的种族歧视相关的因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(15):1906. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151906.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influences of SES on Patient Choice of Doctor: A Systematic Review.社会经济地位对患者选择医生的影响:系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Nov;67(5):759-769. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
2
Exploring the Beliefs, Values, and Understanding of Quality End-of-Life Care in the Latino Community: A Spanish-Language Qualitative Study.探索拉丁裔社区对优质临终关怀的信仰、价值观和理解:一项西班牙语定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 May;41(5):508-515. doi: 10.1177/10499091231188693. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Disparities in Vision Health and Eye Care.
视力健康和眼保健的差异。
Ophthalmology. 2022 Oct;129(10):e89-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Integrating Oral Health into Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of Oral Health Training in Sub-Saharan Africa.将口腔健康纳入初级卫生保健:撒哈拉以南非洲口腔健康培训的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jun 21;15:1361-1367. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S357863. eCollection 2022.
5
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy.美国历史和现代医疗保健政策中的结构性种族主义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):187-194. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466.
6
Summary-statistics-based power analysis: A new and practical method to determine sample size for mixed-effects modeling.基于汇总统计量的功效分析:一种用于确定混合效应模型样本量的新实用方法。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Dec;27(6):1014-1038. doi: 10.1037/met0000330. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Choosing a Provider: What Factors Matter Most to Consumers and Patients?选择医疗服务提供者:哪些因素对消费者和患者最为重要?
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 19;9:23743735221074175. doi: 10.1177/23743735221074175. eCollection 2022.
8
A systematic review of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19.一项关于 COVID-19 中种族/民族和社会经济差异的系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 24;20(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01582-4.
9
Cultural Health Beliefs and Practices Among Hispanic Parents.西班牙裔父母的文化健康信念和实践。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2022 Jan;61(1):56-65. doi: 10.1177/00099228211059666. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Visit Rates Across 29 Specialties.29 个专科门诊就诊率的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1525-1527. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3771.