Rohrich Rachel N, Li Karen R, Lava Christian X, Alahmadi Sami, Stanton Henry L, Kim Victoria H, Spoer Daisy L, Evans Karen K, Steinberg John S, Attinger Christopher E
From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 12;12(8):e6048. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006048. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Patients with nonhealing lower extremity (LE) wounds often require a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) for closure. Nonviable tissue must be debrided before STSG inset. Our study aimed to compare differences in debridement depth on STSG outcomes.
Chronic, atraumatic LE wounds receiving STSG from December 2014 to December 2022 at a single institution were reviewed. Demographics, wound characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Superficially debrided wounds were compared with wounds receiving deep debridement (DD), defined by debriding to the level of white tissue underlying the granulation tissue. Subanalysis was performed on wounds that had a negative and positive postdebridement culture. Primary outcome was graft failure.
Overall, 244 wounds in 168 patients were identified. In total, 158 (64.8%) wounds were superficially debrided and 86 (35.3%) received DD. The cohort had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3]. Diabetes (56.6%) and peripheral artery disease (36.9%) were prevalent. The only statically significant demographic difference between groups was congestive heart failure (SD: 14.9% versus DD: 3.0%, = 0.017). Wound size, depth, and all microbiology results were similar between groups. Postoperatively, the DD group demonstrated significantly less graft failure (10.5% versus 22.2%, = 0.023). In a multivariate regression, DD was independently associated with lower odds of graft failure (OR: 0.0; CI, 0.0-0.8; = 0.034). Sub-analysis of graft failure supported this finding in culture-positive wounds (DD: 7.6% versus DD: 22.1%, = 0.018) but not in culture-negative wounds (13.6% versus 22.2%, = 0.507).
The DD technique demonstrates improved outcomes in chronic, culture-positive LE wounds receiving STSG.
下肢(LE)伤口不愈合的患者通常需要进行中厚皮片移植(STSG)来闭合伤口。在进行STSG植入前,必须清除无活力组织。我们的研究旨在比较清创深度对STSG结果的差异。
回顾了2014年12月至2022年12月在单一机构接受STSG的慢性、非创伤性LE伤口。收集了人口统计学、伤口特征、手术细节和结果。将浅清创伤口与接受深度清创(DD)的伤口进行比较,深度清创定义为清创至肉芽组织下白色组织层。对清创后培养结果为阴性和阳性的伤口进行亚分析。主要结局是移植失败。
总体上,共识别出168例患者的244处伤口。其中,158处(64.8%)伤口进行了浅清创,86处(35.3%)接受了DD。该队列的Charlson合并症指数中位数为4[四分位间距(IQR):3]。糖尿病(56.6%)和外周动脉疾病(36.9%)较为常见。两组之间唯一具有统计学意义的人口统计学差异是充血性心力衰竭(浅清创组:14.9% 对DD组:3.0%,P = 0.017)。两组之间的伤口大小、深度和所有微生物学结果相似。术后,DD组的移植失败率显著更低(10.5%对22.2%,P = 0.023)。在多变量回归分析中,DD与移植失败几率较低独立相关(比值比:0.0;置信区间:-0.0至0.8;P = 0.034)。移植失败的亚分析在培养阳性伤口中支持了这一发现(DD组:7.6%对浅清创组:22.1%,P = 0.018),但在培养阴性伤口中未得到支持(13.6%对22.2%,P = 0.507)。
对于接受STSG的慢性、培养阳性的LE伤口,DD技术显示出更好的结果。