文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

巴西一家私立四级医院行结肠镜筛查的质量指标评价。

EVALUATION OF QUALITY INDICATORS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY PERFORMED IN A PRIVATE QUARTERNARY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.

机构信息

Instituto D´Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Vila Nova Star, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Aug 12;37:e1815. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400022e1815. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.1590/0102-6720202400022e1815
PMID:39140571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11318960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in Brazil, despite the availability of screening methods that reduce its risk. Colonoscopy is the only screening method that also allows therapeutic procedures. The proper screening through colonoscopy is linked to the quality of the exam, which can be evaluated according to quality criteria recommended by various institutions. Among the factors, the most used is the Adenoma Detection Rate, which should be at least 25% for general population. AIMS: To evaluate the quality of the screening colonoscopies performed in a quarternary private Brazilian hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective study evaluating the quality indicators of colonoscopies performed at a private center since its inauguration. Only asymptomatic patients aged over 45 years who underwent screening colonoscopy were included. The primary outcome was the Adenoma Detection Rate, and secondary outcomes included polyps detection rate and safety profile. Subanalyses evaluated the correlation of endoscopic findings with gender and age and the evolution of detection rates over the years. RESULTS: A total of 2,144 patients were include with a mean age of 60.54 years-old. Polyps were diagnosed in 68.6% of the procedures. Adenoma detection rate was 46.8%, with an increasing rate over the years, mainly in males. A low rate of adverse events was reported in 0.23% of the cases, with no need for surgical intervention and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that high quality screening colonoscopy is possible when performed by experienced endoscopists and trained nurses, under an adequate infrastructure.

摘要

背景:尽管有降低风险的筛查方法,结直肠癌仍是巴西第三大常见癌症类型。结肠镜检查是唯一允许进行治疗程序的筛查方法。通过结肠镜检查进行适当的筛查与检查质量有关,可根据各机构推荐的质量标准进行评估。在这些因素中,使用最广泛的是腺瘤检出率,其对于一般人群应至少达到 25%。

目的:评估巴西一家四级私立医院进行的筛查性结肠镜检查的质量。

方法:这是一项回顾性研究,评估了一家私立中心自成立以来的结肠镜检查质量指标。仅纳入无症状、年龄超过 45 岁、接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者。主要结局为腺瘤检出率,次要结局包括息肉检出率和安全性概况。亚分析评估了内镜检查结果与性别和年龄的相关性以及检测率随时间的变化。

结果:共纳入 2144 例患者,平均年龄为 60.54 岁。68.6%的检查中诊断出息肉。腺瘤检出率为 46.8%,且随着时间的推移呈上升趋势,主要见于男性。报告了 0.23%的低不良事件发生率,无手术干预,无死亡病例。

结论:本研究表明,当由经验丰富的内镜医生和经过培训的护士在适当的基础设施下进行时,可实现高质量的筛查性结肠镜检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/726fcdcacca5/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/3f1481d7b4be/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/b465ba55274d/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/726fcdcacca5/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/3f1481d7b4be/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/b465ba55274d/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280a/11318960/726fcdcacca5/0102-6720-abcd-37-e1815-gf03.jpg

相似文献

[1]
EVALUATION OF QUALITY INDICATORS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY PERFORMED IN A PRIVATE QUARTERNARY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024

[2]
Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2014-11-18

[3]
The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.

Dig Liver Dis. 2013-9-18

[4]
The association of colonoscopy quality indicators with the detection of screen-relevant lesions, adverse events, and postcolonoscopy cancers in an asymptomatic Canadian colorectal cancer screening population.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015-11

[5]
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

N Engl J Med. 2010-5-13

[6]
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.

Endoscopy. 2015-3

[7]
Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014-6-17

[8]
Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015-10

[9]
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019-11

[10]
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2017-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
THE USE OF ABDOMINAL CORSETS ON COLONOSCOPY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025-3-14

[2]
ARE QUALITY INDICATORS IMPORTANT IN COLONOSCOPIES? ANALYSIS OF 3,076 EXAMS IN A PRIVATE TERTIARY SERVICE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025-2-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
A Head-to-Head Comparison of Computed Tomography Colonography, Optical Colonoscopy, and Colon Endoscopic Capsule for the Detection of Polyps After Partial Colectomy or Rectosigmoidectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Cureus. 2023-5-1

[2]
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL: EFFECT OF COLONOSCOPY SCREENING ON RISKS OF COLORECTAL CANCER AND RELATED DEATH.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023-3-20

[3]
Key quality indicators in colonoscopy.

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023-3-10

[4]
Relationship between perioperative semaglutide use and residual gastric content: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy.

J Clin Anesth. 2023-8

[5]
Factors influencing the presence of potentially explosive gases during colonoscopy: Results of the SATISFACTION study.

Clin Transl Sci. 2023-5

[6]
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.

Acta Cir Bras. 2023

[7]
Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2023-2

[8]
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.

N Engl J Med. 2022-10-27

[9]
THE ESOPHAGEAL, GASTRIC, AND COLORECTAL TUMORS AND THE ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPIES AND COLONOSCOPIES BY THE BRAZILIAN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE?

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022

[10]
Screening for Colorectal Cancer.

Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索