Suppr超能文献

影响结肠镜检查中潜在爆炸性气体存在的因素:SATISFACTION 研究结果。

Factors influencing the presence of potentially explosive gases during colonoscopy: Results of the SATISFACTION study.

机构信息

Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May;16(5):759-769. doi: 10.1111/cts.13486. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that bowel preparation with mannitol should not affect the colonic concentration of H and CH . Therefore, the SATISFACTION study, an international, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group phase II-III study investigated this issue. The phase II dose-finding part of the study evaluated H , CH , and O concentrations in 179 patients randomized to treatment with 50 g, 100 g, or 150 g mannitol. Phase III of the study compared the presence of intestinal gases in 680 patients randomized (1:1) to receive mannitol 100 g in single dose or a standard split-dose 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-Asc preparation (2 L PEG-Asc). Phase II results showed that mannitol did not influence the concentration of intestinal gases. During phase III, no patient in either group had H or CH concentrations above the critical thresholds. In patients with H and/or CH levels above detectable concentrations, the mean values were below the risk thresholds by at least one order of magnitude. The results also highlighted the effectiveness of standard washing and insufflation maneuvers in removing residual intestinal gases. In conclusion, bowel cleansing with mannitol was safe as the concentrations of H and CH were the same as those found in patients prepared with 2 L PEG-Asc. In both groups, the concentrations of gases were influenced more by the degree of cleansing achieved and the insufflation and washing maneuvers performed than by the preparation used for bowel cleansing. The trial protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04759885) and with EudraCT (eudract_number: 2019-002856-18).

摘要

本研究旨在验证甘露醇肠道准备不会影响结肠内氢(H )和甲烷(CH )浓度的假说。因此,一项国际性、多中心、随机、平行分组的 II-III 期研究(SATISFACTION 研究)调查了这一问题。该研究的 II 期剂量探索部分评估了 179 例随机接受 50g、100g 或 150g 甘露醇治疗的患者的 H 、CH 和 O 浓度。III 期研究比较了 680 例随机(1:1)接受单剂量 100g 甘露醇或标准 2L 聚乙二醇(PEG)-Asc 分次(2L PEG-Asc)准备的患者肠道气体的存在情况。II 期结果表明,甘露醇不影响肠道气体的浓度。在 III 期期间,两组均无患者的 H 或 CH 浓度超过临界阈值。在 H 和/或 CH 水平高于可检测浓度的患者中,平均值至少低于风险阈值一个数量级。研究结果还强调了标准冲洗和注气操作在清除残留肠道气体方面的有效性。总之,甘露醇肠道清洁是安全的,因为 H 和 CH 的浓度与接受 2L PEG-Asc 准备的患者相同。在两组中,气体浓度受清洁程度以及注气和冲洗操作的影响大于肠道清洁所使用的制剂。该试验方案在 ClinicalTrials.gov(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04759885)和 EudraCT(eudract_number: 2019-002856-18)上注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/10176010/6db1b0d8f092/CTS-16-759-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验