Suppr超能文献

从人血清中进行实验室规模的免疫球蛋白 G 纯化方法的比较分析。

Comparative Analysis of Laboratory-Scale Immunoglobulin G Purification Methods from Human Serum.

机构信息

Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286-INFINITE─Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, 59000 Lille, France.

Univ. Lille, CNRS, UAR 3290 - MSAP - Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l'Analyse et la Protéomique, F-59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

J Proteome Res. 2024 Sep 6;23(9):3933-3943. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00268. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) purification is a critical process for evaluating its role in autoimmune diseases, which are defined by the occurrence of autoantibodies. Affinity chromatography with protein G is widely considered to be the optimal technique for laboratory-scale purification. However, this technique has some limitations, including the exposure of IgG to low pH, which can compromise the quality of the purified IgG. Here, we show that alternative methods for IgG purification are possible while maintaining the quality of IgG. Different techniques for IgG purification from serum were evaluated and compared with protein G-based approaches: Melon Gel, caprylic acid-ammonium sulfate (CAAS) precipitation, anion-exchange chromatography with diethylamino ethyl (DEAE) following ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitation, and AS precipitation alone. The results demonstrated that the purification yield of these techniques surpassed that of protein G. However, differences in the purity of IgG were observed using GeLC-MS/MS. The avidity of purified IgG against selected targets (SARS-CoV-2 and topoisomerase-I) was similar between purified IgG obtained using all techniques and unpurified sera. Our work provides valuable insights for future studies of IgG function by recommending alternative purification methods that offer advantages in terms of yield, time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and milder pH conditions than protein G.

摘要

免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)纯化是评估其在自身免疫性疾病中作用的关键过程,自身免疫性疾病的定义是自身抗体的发生。蛋白 G 的亲和层析被广泛认为是实验室规模纯化的最佳技术。然而,该技术存在一些局限性,包括 IgG 暴露于低 pH 值,这可能会影响纯化 IgG 的质量。在这里,我们表明,在保持 IgG 质量的同时,替代 IgG 纯化方法是可能的。评估了从血清中纯化 IgG 的不同技术,并与基于蛋白 G 的方法进行了比较:木瓜凝胶、辛酸-硫酸铵(CAAS)沉淀、DEAE 阴离子交换色谱法(在 AS 沉淀后)和 AS 沉淀法。结果表明,这些技术的纯化产率超过了蛋白 G。然而,使用 GeLC-MS/MS 观察到 IgG 纯度的差异。使用所有技术获得的纯化 IgG 与未纯化血清针对选定靶标(SARS-CoV-2 和拓扑异构酶-I)的亲和力相似。我们的工作通过推荐替代的纯化方法,为 IgG 功能的未来研究提供了有价值的见解,这些方法在产率、时间效率、成本效益和更温和的 pH 条件方面优于蛋白 G。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b49/11468067/be87df46dfa8/pr4c00268_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验