Kozhuharov Nikola, Karim Nabeela, Creta Antonio, Leung Lisa W M, Veasey Rick, Osmanagic Armin, Kefala Anna, Pope Mike, Vouliotis Apostolos, Knecht Sven, Krisai Philipp, Jaïs Pierre, Martin Claire, Sticherling Christian, Ginks Matthew, Ullah Waqas, Balasubramaniam Richard, Kalla Manish, Gallagher Mark M, Hunter Ross J, Wong Tom, Gupta Dhiraj
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01879-8.
Catheter ablation is superior to pharmacological therapy in controlling atrial fibrillation (AF). There are few data on the long-term outcome of AF ablation in octogenarian patients. This analysis aims to evaluate the outcome of AF ablation in octogenarians vs. younger patients.
In this retrospective study in 13 centres in the UK, France, and Switzerland, the long-term outcomes of 473 consecutive octogenarian patients undergoing ablation for AF were compared to 473 matched younger controls (median age 81.3 [80.0, 83.0] vs. 64.4 [56.5, 70.7] years, 54.3% vs. 35.1% females; p-value for both < 0.001). The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after a blanking period of 90 days within 365 days of follow-up.
Acute ablation success as defined as isolation of all pulmonary veins was achieved in 97% of octogenarians. Octogenarians experienced more procedural complications (11.4% vs 7.0%, p = 0.018). The median follow-up time was 281 [106, 365] days vs. 354 [220, 365] days for octogenarians vs. non-octogenarians (p < 0.001). Among octogenarians, 27.7% (131 patients) experienced a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, in contrast to 23.5% (111 patients) in the younger group (odds ratio 1.49; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.92; p = 0.002). In a multivariable regression model including gender, previous AF ablation, vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left atrial dilatation, and indwelling cardiac implantable electronic device, age above 80 remained an independent predictor of recurrence of arrhythmia.
Ablation for AF is effective in octogenarians, but is associated with slightly higher procedural complication rate and recurrence of atrial arrhythmia than in younger patients.
在控制心房颤动(AF)方面,导管消融术优于药物治疗。关于八旬老人房颤消融的长期结果的数据很少。本分析旨在评估八旬老人与年轻患者房颤消融的结果。
在英国、法国和瑞士的13个中心进行的这项回顾性研究中,将473例连续接受房颤消融的八旬老人的长期结果与473例匹配的年轻对照者进行比较(年龄中位数81.3[80.0,83.0]岁对64.4[56.5,70.7]岁,女性分别为54.3%对35.1%;两者p值均<0.001)。主要终点是随访365天内90天空白期后房性心律失常的复发。
97%的八旬老人实现了定义为所有肺静脉隔离的急性消融成功。八旬老人经历了更多的手术并发症(11.4%对7.0%,p = 0.018)。八旬老人的中位随访时间为281[106,365]天,非八旬老人为354[220,365]天(p < 0.001)。在八旬老人中,27.7%(131例患者)经历了房性心律失常复发,而年轻组为23.5%(111例患者)(比值比1.49;95%置信区间1.16 - 1.92;p = 0.002)。在一个包括性别、既往房颤消融、血管疾病、慢性肾病、CHA2DS2 - VASc评分、左心房扩张和植入式心脏电子装置的多变量回归模型中,80岁以上年龄仍然是心律失常复发的独立预测因素。
房颤消融术对八旬老人有效,但与年轻患者相比,手术并发症发生率和房性心律失常复发率略高。