• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可解释机器学习方法的早期脓毒症死亡率预测模型:开发与验证研究

Early sepsis mortality prediction model based on interpretable machine learning approach: development and validation study.

作者信息

Wang Yiping, Gao Zhihong, Zhang Yang, Lu Zhongqiu, Sun Fangyuan

机构信息

Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of WenZhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.

Department of Computer Technology and Information Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of WenZhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):909-918. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03732-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03732-2
PMID:39141286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12009225/
Abstract

Sepsis triggers a harmful immune response due to infection, causing high mortality. Predicting sepsis outcomes early is vital. Despite machine learning's (ML) use in medical research, local validation within the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database is lacking. We aimed to devise a prognostic model, leveraging MIMIC-IV data, to predict sepsis mortality and validate it in a Chinese teaching hospital. MIMIC-IV provided patient data, split into training and internal validation sets. Four ML models logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), deep neural networks (DNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were employed. Shapley additive interpretation offered early and interpretable mortality predictions. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) gaged predictive performance. Results were cross verified in a Chinese teaching hospital. The study included 27,134 sepsis patients from MIMIC-IV and 487 from China. After comparing, 52 clinical indicators were selected for ML model development. All models exhibited excellent discriminative ability. XGBoost surpassed others, with AUROC of 0.873 internally and 0.844 externally. XGBoost outperformed other ML models (LR: 0.829; SVM: 0.830; DNN: 0.837) and clinical scores (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: 0.728; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: 0.728; Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score: 0.738; Glasgow Coma Scale: 0.691). XGBoost's hospital mortality prediction achieved AUROC 0.873, sensitivity 0.818, accuracy 0.777, specificity 0.768, and F1 score 0.551. We crafted an interpretable model for sepsis death risk prediction. ML algorithms surpassed traditional scores for sepsis mortality forecast. Validation in a Chinese teaching hospital echoed these findings.

摘要

脓毒症会因感染引发有害的免疫反应,导致高死亡率。早期预测脓毒症的结局至关重要。尽管机器学习(ML)已用于医学研究,但重症监护医学信息数据库IV(MIMIC-IV)内缺乏局部验证。我们旨在利用MIMIC-IV数据设计一种预后模型,以预测脓毒症死亡率,并在中国一家教学医院进行验证。MIMIC-IV提供了患者数据,分为训练集和内部验证集。采用了四种ML模型,即逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、深度神经网络(DNN)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)。Shapley加法解释提供了早期且可解释的死亡率预测。ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)衡量预测性能。结果在中国一家教学医院进行了交叉验证。该研究纳入了来自MIMIC-IV的27134例脓毒症患者和来自中国的487例患者。经过比较,选择了52项临床指标用于ML模型开发。所有模型均表现出出色的判别能力。XGBoost优于其他模型,内部AUROC为0.873,外部为0.844。XGBoost优于其他ML模型(LR:0.829;SVM:0.830;DNN:0.837)和临床评分(简化急性生理学评分II:0.728;序贯器官衰竭评估:0.728;牛津急性疾病严重程度评分:0.738;格拉斯哥昏迷量表:0.691)。XGBoost对医院死亡率的预测AUROC为0.873,灵敏度为0.818,准确率为0.777,特异性为0.768,F1评分为0.551。我们构建了一个可解释的脓毒症死亡风险预测模型。ML算法在脓毒症死亡率预测方面优于传统评分。在中国一家教学医院的验证也印证了这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/0c6739a0e7ed/11739_2024_3732_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/0e4bb2aa3257/11739_2024_3732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/580558768afd/11739_2024_3732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/0c6739a0e7ed/11739_2024_3732_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/0e4bb2aa3257/11739_2024_3732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/580558768afd/11739_2024_3732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef59/12009225/0c6739a0e7ed/11739_2024_3732_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early sepsis mortality prediction model based on interpretable machine learning approach: development and validation study.基于可解释机器学习方法的早期脓毒症死亡率预测模型:开发与验证研究
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):909-918. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03732-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
3
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated liver injury.用于预测脓毒症相关性肝损伤患者 28 天死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303469. eCollection 2024.
4
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
5
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
6
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU.用于预测ICU中缺血性中风患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jun;198:105874. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105874. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
7
Early prediction of sepsis associated encephalopathy in elderly ICU patients using machine learning models: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.使用机器学习模型对老年重症监护病房患者脓毒症相关脑病进行早期预测:一项基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性研究
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 17;15:1545979. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545979. eCollection 2025.
8
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.
9
Evaluate prognostic accuracy of SOFA component score for mortality among adults with sepsis by machine learning method.采用机器学习方法评估 SOFA 评分对脓毒症成人死亡率的预后准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08045-x.
10
Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: interpretable machine learning approach.建立和验证脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤危重症患者的预后模型:可解释的机器学习方法。
J Transl Med. 2023 Jun 22;21(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04205-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的感染性休克:人工智能在预测预后中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 10;32(8):450. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080450.
2
A multicenter study on developing a prognostic model for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome using machine learning.一项利用机器学习开发严重发热伴血小板减少综合征预后模型的多中心研究。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1557922. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1557922. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Early predicting 30-day mortality in sepsis in MIMIC-III by an artificial neural networks model.基于 MIMIC-III 数据利用人工神经网络模型对脓毒症患者 30 天死亡率进行早期预测。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Dec 17;27(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00925-3.
2
Relationship between the Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Septic Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Based on Propensity Score Matching Method.脓毒症合并心房颤动患者血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值与全因死亡率的关系:基于倾向评分匹配法
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Nov 18;9(11):400. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9110400.
3
Serum Anion Gap Level Predicts All-Cause Mortality in Septic Patients: A Retrospective Study Based on the MIMIC III Database.
血清阴离子间隙水平预测脓毒症患者的全因死亡率:基于 MIMIC III 数据库的回顾性研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;38(4):349-357. doi: 10.1177/08850666221123483. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Application of Machine Learning for Clinical Subphenotype Identification in Sepsis.机器学习在脓毒症临床亚表型识别中的应用。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):1949-1964. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00684-y. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
5
Optimization of patient-based real-time quality control based on the Youden index.基于约登指数的基于患者的实时质量控制优化。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Sep 1;534:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Predictive Value of Plasma Big Endothelin-1 in Adverse Events of Patients With Coronary Artery Restenosis and Diabetes Mellitus: Beyond Traditional and Angiographic Risk Factors.血浆大内皮素-1对冠状动脉再狭窄合并糖尿病患者不良事件的预测价值:超越传统及血管造影危险因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 26;9:854107. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.854107. eCollection 2022.
7
Fast Fault Diagnosis in Industrial Embedded Systems Based on Compressed Sensing and Deep Kernel Extreme Learning Machines.基于压缩感知和深度核极限学习机的工业嵌入式系统快速故障诊断
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 25;22(11):3997. doi: 10.3390/s22113997.
8
Prediction of Poststroke Depression Based on the Outcomes of Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法结果的脑卒中后抑郁预测
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 18;11(8):2264. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082264.
9
Predicting Sepsis Mortality in a Population-Based National Database: Machine Learning Approach.基于人群的国家数据库中预测脓毒症死亡率:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 13;24(4):e29982. doi: 10.2196/29982.
10
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.