Effect of postprocessing parameters on the flexural strength of vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with postprocessing guidelines.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Limited data exist regarding the effects of postprocessing on the flexural strength of vat-polymerized additively manufactured (AM) interim fixed dental prostheses.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine how the postprocessing workflow affects the mechanical properties of vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses and to establish clinical guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was "For vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses (P), does varying the postprocessing workflow/ protocol (I and C) affect mechanical properties/physical properties/flexural strength (O)?" Searches were conducted in 3 databases: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science, with 2 investigators performing the title and abstract screening and setting the inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify publications. The risk of bias was evaluated by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (nonrandomized experimental studies). The reported independent variables of rinse solution, rinse time, and polymerization time on the flexural strength results were extracted for qualitative review.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 149 records, with 12 in vitro studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the manufacturing process and materials. Eleven of 12 included studies reported flexural strength above 100 MPa when following the manufacturer's recommendation. Postprocessing rinsing ranged from 5 seconds to 90 minutes, with potentially reduced flexural strength with extended rinsing. A rinse of 5 to 10 minutes was recommended for optimal mechanical properties, degree of conversion, and biocompatibility. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (TPM) were the most investigated rising solutions, while experimental solutions including 99.5% acetone and 100% bio-ethyl alcohol reportedly decreased flexural strength. Polymerization time and intensity correlated positively with the flexural strength, whereas an artificial aging process reduced the flexural strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity existed in the reported postprocessing protocols for AM interim fixed prostheses, including manufacturer materials, methods, and study outcomes. While polymerization time and intensity correlated with greater strength, consistent patterns regarding rinsing solution or time were lacking. Rinsing solution, extended rinsing time, and artificial aging may reduce flexural strength. Further investigation is indicated.