Osorio-Tejada Jose, Escriba-Gelonch Marc, Vertongen Rani, Bogaerts Annemie, Hessel Volker
School of Engineering, University of Warwick UK
Department of Environment, Soil Sciences and Chemistry, University of Lleida Spain.
Energy Environ Sci. 2024 May 6;17(16):5833-5853. doi: 10.1039/d4ee00164h. eCollection 2024 Aug 13.
Electrification and carbon capture technologies are essential for achieving net-zero emissions in the chemical sector. A crucial strategy involves converting captured CO into CO, a valuable chemical feedstock. This study evaluates the feasibility of two innovative methods: plasma activation and electrolysis, using clean electricity and captured CO. Specifically, it compares a gliding arc plasma reactor with an embedded novel carbon bed system to a modern zero-gap type low-temperature electrolyser. The plasma method stood out with an energy cost of 19.5 GJ per tonne CO, marking a 43% reduction compared to electrolysis and conventional methods. CO production costs for plasma- and electrolysis-based plants were $671 and $962 per tonne, respectively. However, due to high uncertainty regarding electrolyser costs, the CO production costs in electrolysis-based plants may actually range from $570 to $1392 per tonne. The carbon bed system in the plasma method was a key factor in facilitating additional CO generation from O and enhancing CO conversion, contributing to its cost-effectiveness. Challenges for electrolysis included high costs of equipment and low current densities. Addressing these limitations could significantly decrease production costs, but challenges arise from the mutual relationship between intrinsic parameters, such as CO conversion, CO input flow, or energy cost. In a future scenario with affordable feedstocks and equipment, costs could drop below $500 per tonne for both methods. While this may be more challenging for electrolysis due to complexity and expensive catalysts, plasma-based CO production appears more viable and competitive.
电气化和碳捕获技术对于化学行业实现净零排放至关重要。一项关键策略是将捕获的CO转化为CO,这是一种有价值的化学原料。本研究评估了两种创新方法的可行性:等离子体活化和电解,使用清洁电力和捕获的CO。具体而言,它将滑动弧等离子体反应器与嵌入式新型碳床系统与现代零间隙型低温电解槽进行了比较。等离子体方法表现突出,每吨CO的能源成本为19.5 GJ,与电解和传统方法相比降低了43%。基于等离子体和电解的工厂的CO生产成本分别为每吨671美元和962美元。然而,由于电解槽成本存在高度不确定性,基于电解的工厂的CO生产成本实际上可能在每吨570美元至1392美元之间。等离子体方法中的碳床系统是促进从O中额外生成CO并提高CO转化率的关键因素,有助于其成本效益。电解面临的挑战包括设备成本高和电流密度低。解决这些限制可以显著降低生产成本,但挑战来自内在参数之间的相互关系,如CO转化率、CO输入流量或能源成本。在未来原料和设备价格合理的情况下,两种方法的成本都可能降至每吨500美元以下。虽然由于复杂性和昂贵的催化剂,这对电解来说可能更具挑战性,但基于等离子体的CO生产似乎更可行且更具竞争力。