Suppr超能文献

静脉注射艾司洛尔与口服可乐定减轻喉镜检查和气管插管引起的高动力心血管反应的比较研究。

A Comparative Study Between Intravenous Esmolol and Oral Clonidine in Attenuating Hyperdynamic Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation.

作者信息

Mudiganti V N K Srinivas, Murthy Brig Tvsp, Kakara Sneha, Iswarya Mudiganti Raja Sri Jaya, R Pratap, Singam Amol Prakash, Jain Abhishek

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Wardha, IND.

Anesthesiology, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):e64584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64584. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background In today's era of anesthesia, balanced anesthesia is the main basis of patient care and pain management. Of all the medications given during general anesthesia, premedication, induction agents, and muscle relaxants play a major role in keeping the hemodynamics properly under control. When laryngoscopy is performed to intubate, a pain stimulus will be generated, leading to a rise in blood pressure and heart rate. This stimulus can be avoided without any complications if appropriate premedication is given to the patient at the appropriate dosage. In this research, we compare the influence of injection esmolol and oral clonidine during the time of induction as premedications to suppress the hemodynamic response. Material and methods In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 patients were divided into three groups: Group E (esmolol) received 2 mg/kg IV esmolol diluted in 0.9% NS two minutes pre-anesthesia; Group C (clonidine) received oral clonidine 4 mcg/kg 90 minutes pre-anesthesia; and Group P (placebo) received IV normal saline and oral water. Blood pressure, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were measured at baseline and seven subsequent time points. Results The study compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes over seven minutes in three groups, clonidine (Group C), placebo (Group P), and esmolol (Group E). At one minute, Group E showed a consistent MAP decrease from 95.21 mmHg to 85.92 mmHg, while Group C and Group P exhibited fluctuating trends. DBP decreased across all groups, with Group P ending highest (77.7 mmHg) and Group C lowest (66.8 mmHg). Group E's SBP decreased steadily from 126.2 mmHg to 118.0 mmHg, Group C decreased from 128 mmHg to 116.1 mmHg, and Group P showed more erratic fluctuations in SBP, DBP, and MAP. Conclusion These findings suggest that intravenous esmolol shows a good hemodynamic response having superior control over heart rate and getting the pressure under control quickly without major drop compared with the clonidine and placebo groups.

摘要

背景 在当今的麻醉时代,平衡麻醉是患者护理和疼痛管理的主要基础。在全身麻醉期间使用的所有药物中,术前用药、诱导剂和肌肉松弛剂在维持血流动力学稳定方面起着重要作用。当进行喉镜检查插管时,会产生疼痛刺激,导致血压和心率升高。如果在适当的时候给患者使用适当剂量的术前用药,这种刺激可以避免且不会产生任何并发症。在本研究中,我们比较了诱导期静脉注射艾司洛尔和口服可乐定作为术前用药对血流动力学反应的影响。

材料与方法 在一项前瞻性随机对照试验中,90例患者被分为三组:E组(艾司洛尔组)在麻醉前两分钟静脉注射2mg/kg艾司洛尔,用0.9%生理盐水稀释;C组(可乐定组)在麻醉前90分钟口服4μg/kg可乐定;P组(安慰剂组)静脉注射生理盐水和口服水。在基线及随后的七个时间点测量血压、心率和平均动脉压。

结果 该研究比较了三组(可乐定组(C组)、安慰剂组(P组)和艾司洛尔组(E组))在七分钟内收缩压(SBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和舒张压(DBP)的变化。在一分钟时,E组的MAP持续下降,从95.21mmHg降至85.92mmHg,而C组和P组呈现波动趋势。所有组的DBP均下降,P组最后最高(为(77.7mmHg),C组最低(为66.8mmHg)。E组的SBP从126.2mmHg稳步下降至118.0mmHg,C组从128mmHg降至116.1mmHg,P组的SBP、DBP和MAP波动更为不稳定。

结论 这些发现表明,与可乐定组和安慰剂组相比,静脉注射艾司洛尔显示出良好的血流动力学反应,对心率有更好的控制,能迅速控制血压且不会出现大幅下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/11324009/7db3764e9108/cureus-0016-00000064584-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验