• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁为清洁空气买单,为何买单?:分析资源、计划行为以及政府/政策因素对减少颗粒物的多维支付意愿的影响。

Who pays for clean air, and why?: Analyzing the impact of resource, planned behavior, and government/policy factors on the multidimensional willingness to pay for reducing the particulate matter.

作者信息

Jeon Sehyeok, Kim Seoyong, Kim Sohee

机构信息

Social Science Research Institute, Ajou University, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.

Department of Public Administration, Ajou University, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(15):e34643. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34643. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34643
PMID:39144946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11320456/
Abstract

This study aimed to explore the determinants of willingness to pay for fine particulate matter reduction. Previous studies were mostly based on simple causal models, with few or similar predictors affecting a single dimension of willingness to pay. This study adopted a multidimensional model, dividing willingness to pay into three categories: cost burden, benefit to the community and benefit to specific groups. The independent variables were resources, planned behavior, and government/policy factors, with a total of 12 variables. The analysis showed that, first, the determinant structure varied across the dimensions of willingness to pay. Second, facility resources, information, personal norms, social norms, perceived control, trust in government, policy satisfaction, policy preference, and policy knowledge had significant positive effects on willingness to pay. Third, policy satisfaction and social norms had high explanatory power for willingness to pay for cost burden; policy preference and personal norms for benefit to community; and policy knowledge, policy preference, and perceived control for benefit to specific groups.

摘要

本研究旨在探究为减少细颗粒物支付意愿的决定因素。以往的研究大多基于简单的因果模型,影响支付意愿单一维度的预测因素较少或相似。本研究采用了多维模型,将支付意愿分为三类:成本负担、对社区的益处和对特定群体的益处。自变量为资源、计划行为以及政府/政策因素,共有12个变量。分析表明,首先,支付意愿各维度的决定因素结构不同。其次,设施资源、信息、个人规范、社会规范、感知控制、对政府的信任、政策满意度、政策偏好和政策知识对支付意愿有显著的正向影响。第三,政策满意度和社会规范对成本负担支付意愿具有较高的解释力;政策偏好和个人规范对社区益处支付意愿具有较高的解释力;政策知识、政策偏好和感知控制对特定群体益处支付意愿具有较高的解释力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/6be74dce74e6/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/7398e33906f9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/56ea1cf4717d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/6be74dce74e6/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/7398e33906f9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/56ea1cf4717d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/11320456/6be74dce74e6/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Who pays for clean air, and why?: Analyzing the impact of resource, planned behavior, and government/policy factors on the multidimensional willingness to pay for reducing the particulate matter.谁为清洁空气买单,为何买单?:分析资源、计划行为以及政府/政策因素对减少颗粒物的多维支付意愿的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(15):e34643. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34643. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
An extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior to predict willingness to pay for the conservation of an urban park.将计划行为理论扩展应用于预测城市公园保护的支付意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Mar 15;135:91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
3
Residents' Behavioral Intention of Environmental Governance and Its Influencing Factors: Based on a Multidimensional Willingness Measure Perspective.居民环境治理行为意愿及其影响因素研究——基于多维意愿度测度视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214734.
4
Public policy, attitudes and willingness to pay for treatment of substance dependence in Iran.伊朗的公共政策、态度和治疗物质依赖的支付意愿。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Searching for New Human Behavior Model in Explaining Energy Transition: Exploring the Impact of Value and Perception Factors on Inconsistency of Attitude toward Policy Support and Intention to Pay for Energy Transition.探寻解释能源转型的新人类行为模型:探究价值和认知因素对政策支持态度和能源转型支付意愿不一致的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811352.
6
Equity shortfalls & failure of the welfare state: community willingness to pay for health care at government facilities in Jehlum (Pakistan).公平性不足与福利国家的失败:巴基斯坦杰赫勒姆地区社区对政府医疗机构医疗保健服务的支付意愿
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003 Oct-Dec;15(4):43-9.
7
Searching for New Human Behavior Model in the Climate Change Age: Analyzing the Impact of Risk Perception and Government Factors on Intention-Action Consistency in Particulate Matter Mitigation.在气候变化时代寻找新的人类行为模式:分析风险感知和政府因素对颗粒物减排中意图-行动一致性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711068.
8
Study on Willingness to Pay and Impact Mechanism of Gutter Oil Treatment: Taking Urban Residents in Sichuan Province as an Example.地沟油治理的支付意愿及影响机制研究:以四川省城市居民为例
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:711218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711218. eCollection 2021.
9
What Predicts Patients' Willingness to Undergo Online Treatment and Pay for Online Treatment? Results from a Web-Based Survey to Investigate the Changing Patient-Physician Relationship.哪些因素能预测患者接受在线治疗并为在线治疗付费的意愿?一项基于网络的调查结果,旨在探究医患关系的变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 4;18(2):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5244.
10
Increasing Bike-Sharing Users' Willingness to Pay - A Study of China Based on Perceived Value Theory and Structural Equation Model.提高共享单车用户的支付意愿——基于感知价值理论和结构方程模型的中国研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 18;12:747462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747462. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing public willingness-to-pay for different low-carbon measures: A case study of Shenzhen, China.比较公众对不同低碳措施的支付意愿:以中国深圳为例
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0319687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319687. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Can the perceived risk of particulate matter change people's desires and behavior intentions?可吸入颗粒物的感知风险能否改变人们的欲望和行为意图?
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;10:1035174. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035174. eCollection 2022.
2
Searching for New Human Behavior Model in the Climate Change Age: Analyzing the Impact of Risk Perception and Government Factors on Intention-Action Consistency in Particulate Matter Mitigation.在气候变化时代寻找新的人类行为模式:分析风险感知和政府因素对颗粒物减排中意图-行动一致性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711068.
3
The effects of air pollution on individual psychological distress.
空气污染对个体心理困扰的影响。
Health Place. 2017 Nov;48:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews.公众对气候变化的认知:知识与文化世界观的重要性。
Risk Anal. 2015 Dec;35(12):2183-201. doi: 10.1111/risa.12406. Epub 2015 May 29.
5
The effects of positive and negative arousal upon attitudes, belief acceptance, behavioral intention, and behavior.
J Soc Psychol. 1979 Apr;107(Second Half):239-51. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1979.9922704.