• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较公众对不同低碳措施的支付意愿:以中国深圳为例

Comparing public willingness-to-pay for different low-carbon measures: A case study of Shenzhen, China.

作者信息

Hao Haiyan, Lin Jiaying, Qiu Shiyong, Liu Li, Dai Jiahuan

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

World Resources Institute (USA) Beijing Representative Office, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0319687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319687. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319687
PMID:40106469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11922221/
Abstract

Cities in China have made progressive strides in developing low-carbon societies and experimenting with various low-carbon measures. The successful implementation of these low-carbon measures and the subsequent maintenance of relevant amenities rely on the support of local residents. However, there is limited understanding of residents' awareness and support for the different types of low-carbon measures, which can involve different trade-offs. This research addressed this research gap by surveying residents' willingness-to-pay for five representative low-carbon measures implemented in Shenzhen, a pioneering low-carbon city in China. Surveys were collected from 14 distinct residential areas in Shenzhen, and the analysis results revealed that Shenzhen residents were more inclined to pay for low-carbon measures that directly benefit them personally, as opposed to those serving the collective good. This trend was particularly evident among educated elites. Other notable findings include: 1) respondents aware of the different low-carbon measures in effect were more likely to pay for them; 2) male respondents, new Shenzhen residents (relocated within the last 5 years), high-income individuals, and residents in aging residential areas tended to contribute higher amounts towards low-carbon measures; 3) providing detailed information on carbon mitigation effects significantly increased both the likelihood and the amount of respondents' WTP; 4) the adoption of new-energy vehicles (NEVs) is especially controversial between NEV owners and gasoline vehicle owners. These findings hold implications, such as developing targeted policies and educational interventions, to enhance public awareness and support for low-carbon initiatives, thus fostering sustainability in rapidly growing urban centers like Shenzhen.

摘要

中国城市在发展低碳社会和试验各种低碳措施方面取得了逐步进展。这些低碳措施的成功实施以及相关便利设施的后续维护依赖于当地居民的支持。然而,对于居民对不同类型低碳措施的认识和支持程度了解有限,因为这些措施可能涉及不同的权衡。本研究通过调查中国低碳先锋城市深圳实施的五项代表性低碳措施的居民支付意愿,填补了这一研究空白。从深圳14个不同的居民区收集了调查问卷,分析结果显示,深圳居民更倾向于为直接使个人受益的低碳措施付费,而不是那些服务于集体利益的措施。这种趋势在受过教育的精英群体中尤为明显。其他显著发现包括:1)了解实际实施的不同低碳措施的受访者更有可能为其付费;2)男性受访者、新深圳居民(过去5年内搬迁至此)、高收入个人以及老旧居民区的居民倾向于为低碳措施贡献更高的金额;3)提供有关碳减排效果的详细信息显著增加了受访者支付意愿的可能性和金额;4)新能源汽车的采用在新能源汽车车主和汽油车车主之间尤其具有争议性。这些发现具有启示意义,例如制定针对性政策和开展教育干预,以提高公众对低碳倡议的认识和支持,从而促进像深圳这样快速发展的城市中心的可持续发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/dc866af8047c/pone.0319687.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/e485257f5f14/pone.0319687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/26be194a0a90/pone.0319687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/d42078451b0d/pone.0319687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/28f69a674a5d/pone.0319687.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/d2cd83d594e8/pone.0319687.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/70b3374bd45a/pone.0319687.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/fd53b1702c6c/pone.0319687.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/cb8e5193eea9/pone.0319687.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/6bf2e46862b0/pone.0319687.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/dc866af8047c/pone.0319687.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/e485257f5f14/pone.0319687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/26be194a0a90/pone.0319687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/d42078451b0d/pone.0319687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/28f69a674a5d/pone.0319687.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/d2cd83d594e8/pone.0319687.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/70b3374bd45a/pone.0319687.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/fd53b1702c6c/pone.0319687.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/cb8e5193eea9/pone.0319687.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/6bf2e46862b0/pone.0319687.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2d8/11922221/dc866af8047c/pone.0319687.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing public willingness-to-pay for different low-carbon measures: A case study of Shenzhen, China.比较公众对不同低碳措施的支付意愿:以中国深圳为例
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0319687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319687. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions of Health Co-Benefits in Relation to Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: A Survey among Urban Residents in Three Chinese Cities.与温室气体减排相关的健康协同效益认知:对中国三个城市居民的一项调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 13;14(3):298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030298.
3
Haze Attitudes and the Willingness to Pay for Haze Improvement: Evidence from Four Cities in Shandong Province, China.雾霾态度与改善雾霾的意愿支付:来自中国山东省四个城市的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 19;15(10):2297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102297.
4
Public willingness to pay for CO2 mitigation and the determinants under climate change: a case study of Suzhou, China.公众对二氧化碳减排的支付意愿及气候变化背景下的影响因素:以中国苏州为例
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
5
Analysis of residents' willingness to pay to reduce air pollution to improve children's health in community and hospital settings in Shanghai, China.中国上海社区和医院环境中降低空气污染改善儿童健康的居民支付意愿分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;533:283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.140. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
6
Pollution exposure and willingness to pay for clean air in urban China.中国城市的污染暴露与对清洁空气的支付意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110174. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Contingent Valuation of Residents' Attitudes and Willingness-to-Pay for Non-point Source Pollution Control: A Case Study in AL-Prespa, Southeastern Albania.居民对非点源污染控制的态度及支付意愿的条件价值评估:以阿尔巴尼亚东南部的阿尔-普雷斯帕为例
Environ Manage. 2015 Jul;56(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0480-6. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
Residents' Willingness to Pay for Water Pollution Treatment and Its Influencing Factors: a Case Study of Taihu Lake Basin.居民对水污染治理的支付意愿及其影响因素:以太湖流域为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;74(3):490-504. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01968-4. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Valuing health effects from the industrial air pollution in rural Tianjin, China.评估中国天津农村地区工业空气污染对健康的影响。
J Environ Sci (China). 2004;16(1):157-60.
10
Urban residents' response to and evaluation of low-carbon travel policies: Evidence from a survey of five eastern cities in China.城市居民对低碳出行政策的响应和评价:来自中国五个东部城市的调查证据。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.091. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Who pays for clean air, and why?: Analyzing the impact of resource, planned behavior, and government/policy factors on the multidimensional willingness to pay for reducing the particulate matter.谁为清洁空气买单,为何买单?:分析资源、计划行为以及政府/政策因素对减少颗粒物的多维支付意愿的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(15):e34643. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34643. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
Residents' willingness to engage in carbon generalized system of preferences - A personality insight study based on the extended theory of planned behavior.居民参与碳普惠意愿的人格洞察研究——基于扩展计划行为理论。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121224. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121224. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Residential open space and the perception of health benefits: How much is the public willing to pay?
住宅开放空间与健康效益感知:公众愿意支付多少?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115273. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115273. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Effects of social interactions and information bias on the willingness to pay for transboundary basin ecosystem services.社会互动和信息偏差对跨境流域生态系统服务支付意愿的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113233. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113233. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
Pollution exposure and willingness to pay for clean air in urban China.中国城市的污染暴露与对清洁空气的支付意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110174. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
Social class and prosocial behavior: current evidence, caveats, and questions.社会阶层与亲社会行为:现有证据、注意事项与问题。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
7
Public willingness to pay for CO2 mitigation and the determinants under climate change: a case study of Suzhou, China.公众对二氧化碳减排的支付意愿及气候变化背景下的影响因素:以中国苏州为例
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
8
Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior.拥有更少,给予更多:社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):771-84. doi: 10.1037/a0020092.
9
Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats.引出支付意愿:封闭式、开放式和支付量表格式的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2):150-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03251245.