• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素能预测患者接受在线治疗并为在线治疗付费的意愿?一项基于网络的调查结果,旨在探究医患关系的变化。

What Predicts Patients' Willingness to Undergo Online Treatment and Pay for Online Treatment? Results from a Web-Based Survey to Investigate the Changing Patient-Physician Relationship.

作者信息

Roettl Johanna, Bidmon Sonja, Terlutter Ralf

机构信息

Alpen-Adria Universitaet Klagenfurt, Department of Marketing and International Management, Klagenfurt, Austria.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 4;18(2):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5244.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5244
PMID:26846162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4782912/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substantial research has focused on patients' health information-seeking behavior on the Internet, but little is known about the variables that may predict patients' willingness to undergo online treatment and willingness to pay additionally for online treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed sociodemographic variables, psychosocial variables, and variables of Internet usage to predict willingness to undergo online treatment and willingness to pay additionally for online treatment offered by the general practitioner (GP).

METHODS

An online survey of 1006 randomly selected German patients was conducted. The sample was drawn from an e-panel maintained by GfK HealthCare. Missing values were imputed; 958 usable questionnaires were analyzed. Variables with multi-item measurement were factor analyzed. Willingness to undergo online treatment and willingness to pay additionally for online treatment offered by the GP were predicted using 2 multiple regression models.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analyses revealed that the disposition of patients' personality to engage in information-searching behavior on the Internet was unidimensional. Exploratory factor analysis with the variables measuring the motives for Internet usage led to 2 separate factors: perceived usefulness (PU) of the Internet for health-related information searching and social motives for information searching on the Internet. Sociodemographic variables did not serve as significant predictors for willingness to undergo online treatment offered by the GP, whereas PU (B=.092, P=.08), willingness to communicate with the GP more often in the future (B=.495, P<.001), health-related information-seeking personality (B=.369, P<.001), actual use of online communication with the GP (B=.198, P<.001), and social motive (B=.178, P=.002) were significant predictors. Age, gender, satisfaction with the GP, social motive, and trust in the GP had no significant impact on the willingness to pay additionally for online treatment, but it was predicted by health-related information-seeking personality (B=.127, P=.07), PU (B=-.098, P=.09), willingness to undergo online treatment (B=.391, P<.001), actual use of online communication with the GP (B=.192, P=.001), highest education level (B=.178, P<.001), monthly household net income (B=.115, P=.01), and willingness to communicate with the GP online more often in the future (B=.076, P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, gender, and trust in the GP were not significant predictors for either willingness to undergo online treatment or to pay additionally for online treatment. Willingness to undergo online treatment was partly determined by the actual use of online communication with the GP, willingness to communicate online with the GP, health information-seeking personality, and social motivation for such behavior. Willingness to pay extra for online treatment was influenced by the monthly household net income category and education level. The results of this study are useful for online health care providers and physicians who are considering offering online treatments as a viable number of patients would appreciate the possibility of undergoing an online treatment offered by their GP.

摘要

背景

大量研究聚焦于患者在互联网上的健康信息搜索行为,但对于可能预测患者接受在线治疗意愿以及为在线治疗额外付费意愿的变量却知之甚少。

目的

本研究分析社会人口统计学变量、心理社会变量以及互联网使用变量,以预测患者接受在线治疗的意愿以及为全科医生(GP)提供的在线治疗额外付费的意愿。

方法

对1006名随机选取的德国患者进行了在线调查。样本取自GfK医疗保健公司维护的一个电子面板。对缺失值进行了插补;分析了958份可用问卷。对具有多项目测量的变量进行了因子分析。使用两个多元回归模型预测患者接受在线治疗的意愿以及为全科医生提供的在线治疗额外付费的意愿。

结果

探索性因子分析表明,患者在互联网上进行信息搜索行为的个性倾向是单维的。对测量互联网使用动机的变量进行探索性因子分析得出了两个独立因子:互联网对健康相关信息搜索的感知有用性(PU)以及在互联网上进行信息搜索的社会动机。社会人口统计学变量并非预测患者接受全科医生提供的在线治疗意愿的显著因素,而PU(B = 0.092,P = 0.08)、未来更频繁与全科医生交流的意愿(B = 0.495,P < 0.001)、与健康相关的信息搜索个性(B = 0.369,P < 0.001)、与全科医生实际进行在线交流的情况(B = 0.198,P < 0.001)以及社会动机(B = 0.178,P = 0.002)是显著预测因素。年龄、性别、对全科医生的满意度、社会动机以及对全科医生的信任对为在线治疗额外付费的意愿没有显著影响,但它可由与健康相关的信息搜索个性(B = 0.127,P = 0.07)、PU(B = -0.098,P = 0.09)、接受在线治疗的意愿(B = 0.391,P < 0.001)、与全科医生实际进行在线交流的情况(B = 0.192,P = 0.001)、最高教育水平(B = 0.178,P < 0.001)、家庭月净收入(B = 0.115,P = 0.01)以及未来更频繁与全科医生进行在线交流的意愿(B = 0.076,P = 0.03)预测。

结论

年龄、性别以及对全科医生的信任对于接受在线治疗的意愿或为在线治疗额外付费的意愿均不是显著预测因素。接受在线治疗的意愿部分由与全科医生实际进行在线交流的情况、与全科医生在线交流的意愿、健康信息搜索个性以及此类行为的社会动机所决定。为在线治疗额外付费的意愿受到家庭月净收入类别和教育水平的影响。本研究结果对于在线医疗服务提供者以及考虑将在线治疗作为一种可行方式的医生而言是有用的,因为相当数量的患者会欣赏接受全科医生提供的在线治疗的可能性。

相似文献

1
What Predicts Patients' Willingness to Undergo Online Treatment and Pay for Online Treatment? Results from a Web-Based Survey to Investigate the Changing Patient-Physician Relationship.哪些因素能预测患者接受在线治疗并为在线治疗付费的意愿?一项基于网络的调查结果,旨在探究医患关系的变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 4;18(2):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5244.
2
Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.德国互联网健康信息搜索中的性别差异及虚拟医患关系:关于男性与女性差异及原因的探索性结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4127.
3
What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.如何解释移动医生评分应用程序的使用情况?基于网络问卷的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 11;16(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3122.
4
Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.谁会使用医生评级网站?医生评级网站的用户和非用户在社会人口统计学变量、心理特征变量及健康状况方面的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 31;16(3):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3145.
5
Mature or Emerging? The Impact of Treatment-Related Internet Health Information Seeking on Patients' Trust in Physicians.成熟还是新兴?治疗相关的互联网健康信息搜索对患者对医生信任的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(9):1855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091855.
6
Web portals in primary care: an evaluation of patient readiness and willingness to pay for online services.基层医疗中的网络门户:对患者接受程度及为在线服务付费意愿的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Oct 26;8(4):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e26.
7
Association Between eHealth Literacy in Online Health Communities and Patient Adherence: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.在线健康社区中的电子健康素养与患者遵医行为之间的关联:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 13;23(9):e14908. doi: 10.2196/14908.
8
The role of provider-patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities.医患沟通和信任在互联网使用中的作用,以及互联网在与健康相关的活动中的作用。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:186-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522691.
9
Relationship Between Internet Health Information and Patient Compliance Based on Trust: Empirical Study.基于信任的互联网健康信息与患者依从性之间的关系:实证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 17;20(8):e253. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9364.
10
Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.与在医生评价网站上对医生进行实际评价行为及意图相关的因素:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 4;22(6):e14417. doi: 10.2196/14417.

引用本文的文献

1
User Personas for eHealth Regarding the Self-Management of Depressive Symptoms in People Living With HIV: Mixed Methods Study.关于艾滋病毒感染者抑郁症状自我管理的电子健康用户角色:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 17;27:e56289. doi: 10.2196/56289.
2
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
3
Establishing trust in emergency telehealth consultations.在紧急远程医疗会诊中建立信任。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14543. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14543. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Understanding psychology students' perspective on video psychotherapy and their intention to offer it after graduation: a mixed-methods study.了解心理学专业学生对视频心理治疗的看法及其毕业后提供该治疗的意愿:一项混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1234167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1234167. eCollection 2023.
5
Willingness to Use and Pay for Digital Health Care Services According to 4 Scenarios: Results from a National Survey.根据 4 种情景愿意使用和付费数字医疗保健服务的意愿:全国调查结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 29;11:e40834. doi: 10.2196/40834.
6
Patients' choice preferences for specialist outpatient online consultations: A discrete choice experiment.患者对专科门诊在线咨询的选择偏好:离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;10:1075146. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1075146. eCollection 2022.
7
Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.医生评级网站的认知度与交互作用:奥地利的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0278510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278510. eCollection 2022.
8
Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis.与门诊虚拟诊所利用相关的因素:使用多层次分析的回顾性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 12;24(8):e40288. doi: 10.2196/40288.
9
Explore How Online Healthcare Can Influence Willingness to Seek Offline Care.探讨在线医疗保健如何影响线下就医意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137925.
10
The Influence of Perceived Social Presence on the Willingness to Communicate in Mobile Medical Consultations: Experimental Study.感知社交存在感对移动医疗咨询中交流意愿的影响:实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 11;24(5):e31797. doi: 10.2196/31797.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.德国互联网健康信息搜索中的性别差异及虚拟医患关系:关于男性与女性差异及原因的探索性结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4127.
2
The Impact of Internet Health Information on Patient Compliance: A Research Model and an Empirical Study.互联网健康信息对患者依从性的影响:一个研究模型及实证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 11;17(6):e143. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4333.
3
Patient use of email for health care communication purposes across 14 European countries: an analysis of users according to demographic and health-related factors.14个欧洲国家患者使用电子邮件进行医疗保健沟通的情况:根据人口统计学和健康相关因素对用户的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 6;17(3):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3700.
4
Integrating health belief model and technology acceptance model: an investigation of health-related internet use.整合健康信念模型与技术接受模型:对健康相关互联网使用情况的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 19;17(2):e45. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3564.
5
Online medical care: the current state of "eVisits" in acute primary care delivery.在线医疗服务:急性初级医疗服务中“电子问诊”的现状
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):90-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0022. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
6
Physicians' motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior.医生使用专业互联网的动机以及对通过互联网获取信息的患者的态度差异、医患沟通和开处方行为。
Med 2 0. 2012 Jul 6;1(2):e2. doi: 10.2196/med20.1996. eCollection 2012 Jul-Dec.
7
What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.如何解释移动医生评分应用程序的使用情况?基于网络问卷的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 11;16(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3122.
8
Chinese older adults' Internet use for health information.中国老年人使用互联网获取健康信息的情况。
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Apr;33(3):316-35. doi: 10.1177/0733464812463430. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
9
Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.谁会使用医生评级网站?医生评级网站的用户和非用户在社会人口统计学变量、心理特征变量及健康状况方面的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 31;16(3):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3145.
10
Characteristics of patients who seek care via eVisits instead of office visits.通过电子访视而非门诊寻求医疗服务的患者特征。
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jul;19(7):515-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0221. Epub 2013 May 19.