Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Pediatric Clinic, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1439078. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439078. eCollection 2024.
The use of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic is debated. Understanding the consequences these measures may have on vulnerable populations including children and adolescents is important.
This is a multicenter, quasi-experimental before-after study involving 12 hospitals of the North Italian Emilia-Romagna Region, with NPI implementation as the intervention event. The 3 years preceding NPI implementation (in March 2020) constituted the pre-pandemic phase. The subsequent 2 years were further subdivided into a school closure phase (SC) and a subsequent mitigation measures phase (MM) with milder restrictions. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) regression analysis was used to calculate PED Standardized Incidence Rate Ratios (SIRR) on the diagnostic categories exhibiting the greatest frequency and/or variation.
In the 60 months of the study there were 765,215 PED visits. Compared to the pre-pandemic rate, overall PED presentations dropped by 58 and 39% during SC and MM, respectively. "Symptoms, signs and Ill-defined conditions," "Injury and poisoning" and "Diseases of the Respiratory System" accounted for 74% of the reduction. A different pattern was instead seen for "Mental Disorders," which exhibited the smallest decrease during SC, and is the only category which rose already at the end of SC. ITS analysis confirmed the strong decrease during SC (level change, IRR 0.17, 95%CI 0.12-0.27) and a significant increase in MM (slope change, IRR 1.23, 95%CI 1.13-1.33), with the sharpest decline (-94%) and rise (+36%) observed in the "Diseases of the Respiratory System" category. Mental Disorders showed a significant increasing trend of 1% monthly over the whole study period exceeding pre-pandemic levels at the end of MM. Females and adolescents showed higher increasing rates both in SC and MM.
NPIs appear to have influenced PED attendance in different ways according to diagnostic categories, mirroring different mechanisms of action. These effects are beneficial in some cases and harmful in others, and establishing a clear balance between pros and cons is a difficult task for public health decision makers. The role of NPIs on PED use appropriateness deserves investigation. The rise in pediatric mental disorders independent of the pandemic makes interventions addressing these issues urgent.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非药物干预(NPIs)的使用存在争议。了解这些措施可能对包括儿童和青少年在内的弱势群体产生的后果非常重要。
这是一项涉及意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅地区 12 家医院的多中心、准实验前后研究,以 NPI 的实施作为干预事件。在 NPI 实施前的 3 年(2020 年 3 月)构成大流行前阶段。随后的 2 年进一步细分为学校关闭阶段(SC)和随后的缓解措施阶段(MM),限制较为宽松。使用中断时间序列(ITS)回归分析计算在表现出最大频率和/或变化的诊断类别上的儿科急诊就诊标准化发病率比(SIRR)。
在研究的 60 个月中,有 765,215 次儿科急诊就诊。与大流行前的比率相比,SC 和 MM 期间总体儿科急诊就诊率分别下降了 58%和 39%。“症状、体征和未明情况”、“伤害和中毒”以及“呼吸系统疾病”占减少的 74%。“精神障碍”则呈现出不同的模式,其在 SC 期间的下降幅度最小,并且是唯一一个在 SC 结束时已经上升的类别。ITS 分析证实了 SC 期间的急剧下降(水平变化,IRR 0.17,95%CI 0.12-0.27)和 MM 期间的显著增加(斜率变化,IRR 1.23,95%CI 1.13-1.33),其中“呼吸系统疾病”类别的下降幅度最大(-94%)和上升幅度最大(+36%)。在整个研究期间,精神障碍每月呈现出 1%的显著增长趋势,在 MM 结束时超过了大流行前的水平。女性和青少年在 SC 和 MM 期间的增长率都较高。
NPIs 似乎根据诊断类别以不同的方式影响儿科急诊就诊,反映了不同的作用机制。这些影响在某些情况下是有益的,而在其他情况下则是有害的,因此公共卫生决策者很难在利弊之间取得明确的平衡。NPIs 对儿科急诊就诊适宜性的影响值得研究。与大流行无关的儿科精神障碍的增加使得解决这些问题的干预措施迫在眉睫。