• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[非药物干预对家庭照顾者的效果如何?一项荟萃分析的系统评价]

[How effective are non-pharmacological interventions for family caregivers? A systematic review with meta-analyses].

作者信息

Janson Patrick, Hung Chu-Wei, Willeke Kristina, Frisch Dieter, Berghöfer Anne, Heuschmann Peter, Zapf Andreas, Wildner Manfred, Stupp Carolin, Keil Thomas

机构信息

Landesinstitut Gesundheit I, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Erlangen, Germany.

Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2025 Feb;87(2):145-160. doi: 10.1055/a-2340-1560. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1055/a-2340-1560
PMID:39146966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11849791/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Informal caregiving is associated with mental disorders and reduced quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the results of methodologically high-quality intervention studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on patient-relevant outcomes for family caregivers in Germany.

METHOD

We searched three large scientific literature databases for intervention studies with a control group and a low or moderate risk of bias on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for family caregivers in Germany.

RESULT

Among 4,376 publications reviewed, 10 intervention studies with good methodological quality were identified. These investigated multi-component interventions or cognitive behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia (8 studies), stroke (1 study) and with general care dependency (1 study). The control groups received information material as a minimal intervention or usual standard care. Meta-analyses showed a statistically significant slight reduction in depressive symptoms 3-6 months after the start of the study as a result of cognitive behavioral therapy (standardized mean difference -0.27; 95% confidence interval -0.44 - -0.10), but this no longer reached statistical significance after 9-12 months (-0.21; -0.51 - 0.09). Multi-component interventions showed no changes in depressive symptoms either after 3-6 or after 9-12 months (-0.18; -0.40 - 0.03 and -0.14; -0.47 - 0.14, respectively). In contrast, the mental component of quality of life of family caregivers improved statistically significantly in the multi-component intervention groups compared to the control groups: slightly after 3-6 months (0.28; 0.01 - 0.56) and moderately after 9-12 months (0.45; 0.09 - 0.82). The interventions had no effect on the physical component of quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of depressive symptoms by behavioral therapy interventions for family caregivers appears to be only slight and not sustainable. The mental component of quality of life of people affected may be improved in the longer term by multi-component interventions. Current scientifically examined interventions for informal caregivers do not appear to have a sufficient and sustainable effect. Greater effects could possibly be achieved through more elaborate behavioral approaches, but also structural preventive measures.

摘要

引言

非正式照护与精神障碍及生活质量下降有关。本系统综述的目的是总结德国针对家庭照护者与患者相关结局的非药物干预有效性的方法学高质量干预研究结果。

方法

我们在三个大型科学文献数据库中检索了针对德国家庭照护者非药物干预有效性的、设有对照组且偏倚风险较低或中等的干预研究。

结果

在审查的4376篇出版物中,确定了10项方法学质量良好的干预研究。这些研究调查了针对痴呆症患者(8项研究)、中风患者(1项研究)和一般需要照料者(1项研究)的家庭照护者的多成分干预或认知行为疗法。对照组接受信息材料作为最低限度干预或常规标准护理。荟萃分析显示,由于认知行为疗法,在研究开始后3至6个月,抑郁症状有统计学意义的轻微减轻(标准化均差-0.27;95%置信区间-0.44至-0.10),但在9至12个月后不再具有统计学意义(-0.21;-0.51至-0.09)。多成分干预在3至6个月或9至12个月后抑郁症状均无变化(分别为-0.18;-0.40至-0.03和-0.14;-0.47至-0.14)。相比之下,与对照组相比,多成分干预组家庭照护者生活质量的心理成分有统计学意义的显著改善:在3至6个月后略有改善(0.28;0.01至0.56),在9至12个月后中度改善(0.45;0.09至0.82)。这些干预对生活质量的身体成分没有影响。

结论

行为疗法干预对家庭照护者抑郁症状的减轻似乎只是轻微的且不可持续。多成分干预可能会在长期内改善受影响者生活质量的心理成分。目前针对非正式照护者的科学研究干预措施似乎没有足够且可持续的效果。通过更精细的行为方法以及结构性预防措施可能会取得更大的效果。

相似文献

1
[How effective are non-pharmacological interventions for family caregivers? A systematic review with meta-analyses].[非药物干预对家庭照顾者的效果如何?一项荟萃分析的系统评价]
Gesundheitswesen. 2025 Feb;87(2):145-160. doi: 10.1055/a-2340-1560. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.由医疗保健专业人员进行的电话干预,旨在为患有确诊疾病的成年人的非正式护理人员提供教育和心理社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012533.pub2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
5
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
8
Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in community settings.为社区环境中患有痴呆症的人群改善心理社会状况而量身定制的活动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 17;8(8):CD010515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010515.pub2.
9
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
10
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
[Assessing the health of working informal caregivers : Analysis of an employment survey using propensity score matching].[评估在职非正式照料者的健康状况:使用倾向得分匹配法对一项就业调查的分析]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Jul;58(4):296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00391-024-02387-0. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update.癌症患者及其照护者的对偶心理社会干预:最新进展。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;34(4):304-312. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000835. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Mortality, Morbidity and Health-Related Outcomes in Informal Caregivers Compared to Non-Caregivers: A Systematic Review.非照料者与照料者的死亡率、发病率和健康相关结局比较:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 11;19(10):5864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105864.
3
Telephone-based aftercare groups for family carers of people with dementia - results of the effect evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.
基于电话的痴呆患者家属随访小组 - 一项随机对照试验效果评估的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07490-9.
4
Long-term effects of telephone-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: Findings at 3-year follow-up.基于电话的认知行为干预对痴呆患者家属的长期影响:3 年随访结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):341-349. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000640.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
7
Out of sight, out of mind: long-term outcomes for people discharged home, to inpatient rehabilitation and to residential aged care after stroke.眼不见,心不烦:中风后出院回家、到住院康复和入住养老院的患者的长期结局。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2608-2614. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1852616. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
TALKING TIME: A pilot randomized controlled trial investigating social support for informal caregivers via the telephone.交流时间:一项通过电话为非正式照护者提供社会支持的试点随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05523-9.
9
What is known from the existing literature about peer support interventions for carers of individuals living with dementia: A scoping review.现有文献中关于同伴支持干预措施在照顾痴呆症患者的照护者中的应用:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jul;28(4):1134-1151. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12944. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Family Caregiving for Older Adults.老年人家庭护理。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:635-659. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754.