Meisel A D, Germain B F
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Feb;14(3 Suppl 1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(85)90053-8.
The efficacy of piroxicam 20 mg/qd was compared with that of sulindac 200 mg twice a day in 49 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents showed statistically significant improvement in efficacy variables including duration of morning stiffness, disease activity as judged by the examiner and by the patient, patient assessment of feeling, total joint pain, total joint swelling, and performance of daily activities. The overall frequency of adverse reactions was similar with both treatment regimens, and required discontinuance in three patients in each treatment group. However, the number of moderate/severe adverse reactions in the sulindac-treated patients was greater than that in the piroxicam-treated patients, and there was a trend toward the differences between the two groups being statistically significant (P = .06). Both drugs were effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and resulted in comparable improvement in efficacy variables.
将49例类风湿性关节炎患者中,吡罗昔康20毫克/每日的疗效与舒林酸200毫克每日两次的疗效进行了比较。两种非甾体抗炎药在疗效变量方面均显示出具有统计学意义的改善,这些变量包括晨僵持续时间、由检查者和患者判断的疾病活动度、患者的感觉评估、总关节疼痛、总关节肿胀以及日常活动表现。两种治疗方案的不良反应总体发生率相似,每个治疗组均有3例患者因不良反应而停药。然而,舒林酸治疗组中重度不良反应的数量多于吡罗昔康治疗组,且两组之间的差异有统计学意义的趋势(P = 0.06)。两种药物在治疗类风湿性关节炎方面均有效,且在疗效变量方面有相当的改善。