• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射学教育中Instagram短视频与图像帖子的比较

Instagram reels versus image posts in radiology education.

作者信息

Kauffman Lilly, Lopez-Ramirez Felipe, Weisberg Edmund M, Fishman Elliot K

机构信息

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, JHOC 3250, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, 600 N. Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2025 Mar-Apr;54(2):170-175. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.08.005
PMID:39147628
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In January 2016, we created an Instagram page for radiology education. Numerous publications in different fields have reported that Instagram "reels," introduced in 2020 as a short-form video feature, are more popular than image posts. These findings and our familiarity with Instagram prompted us to analyze our own data to better understand how image posts compared with reels when used in the context of radiology education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For each post category, metric values were extracted from the Instagram platform and analyzed as continuous variables, reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Metrics were compared between image categories using the Kruskal-Wallis test, with resulting p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. Corrected p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We included 128 images and 96 reels in the analysis. Images generally reached a larger audience, with a median of 18,745 [IQR: 13,478-27,243] impressions vs. 11,972 [IQR: 9,310.0-13,844.5] for reels (p < 0.01). Images also tended to be shared more frequently (median 19 vs. 20, p < 0.01), liked more often (median 480 vs. 296, p < 0.01), and saved more by users (median 138 vs. 84, p < 0.01) than reels, respectively. Both images and reels received a similar number of comments, with a median of 3 comments for both (p > 0.99). We also explored the performance differences of image post subcategories. Within images, our "You Make the Call!" (YMTC) questions (n = 23) displayed higher performance metrics across the board than the three other types of image posts combined (n = 105). When compared, the median number of impressions for YMTC images was 36,735 [IQR: 31,343-40,742] vs. 15,992 [IQR:12,774-21,873] for other types of images (p < 0.01). YMTC images were shared more often (median 25 vs. 17, p < 0.01), received more likes (median 809 vs. 445, p < 0.01) and saves (median 206 vs. 119, p < 0.01) than non-YMTC images, respectively. User engagement showed slightly different trends with YMTC reels being the most liked, while quiz reels receiving the most comments and talking clips being the most saved.

CONCLUSION

Our findings on the use of Instagram in radiology education suggest that static images perform much better than reels. Consequently, we recommend to radiology educators seeking to establish an Instagram presence that using static image posts is an appropriate approach for reaching a radiology audience, particularly with image posts that engage an audience with participatory opportunities such as answering quiz-like questions aimed at making a diagnosis.

摘要

目的

2016年1月,我们创建了一个用于放射学教育的Instagram页面。不同领域的众多出版物报道称,2020年推出的Instagram“短片”作为一种短视频功能,比图片帖子更受欢迎。这些发现以及我们对Instagram的熟悉程度促使我们分析自己的数据,以更好地了解在放射学教育背景下使用时,图片帖子与短片相比情况如何。

材料与方法

对于每个帖子类别,从Instagram平台提取指标值并作为连续变量进行分析,报告为中位数及四分位间距(IQR)。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较图片类别之间的指标,所得p值使用Bonferroni校正进行多重比较调整。校正后p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

我们在分析中纳入了128张图片和96个短片。图片通常能触达更多受众,图片的中位数展示量为18,745[IQR:13,478 - 27,243],而短片为11,972[IQR:9,310.0 - 13,844.5](p < 0.01)。图片也往往被分享得更频繁(中位数19次对20次,p < 0.01),被点赞得更多(中位数480次对296次,p < 0.01),并且被用户保存得更多(中位数138次对84次,p < 0.0 |)。图片和短片收到的评论数量相似,两者的中位数均为3条评论(p > 0.99)。我们还探讨了图片帖子子类别的表现差异。在图片中,我们的“你来判断!”(YMTC)问题(n = 23)在各项指标上的表现总体高于其他三种类型的图片帖子总和(n = 105)。相比之下,YMTC图片的中位数展示量为36,735[IQR:31,343 - 40,742],而其他类型图片为15,992[IQR:12,774 - 21,873](p < 0.01)。YMTC图片比非YMTC图片被分享得更频繁(中位数25次对17次,p < 0.01),获得更多点赞(中位数809次对445次,p < 0.01)和保存(中位数206次对119次,p < 0.01)。用户参与度呈现出略有不同的趋势,其中YMTC短片最受点赞,而问答短片收到的评论最多,讲解片段被保存得最多。

结论

我们关于在放射学教育中使用Instagram的研究结果表明,静态图片比短片表现要好得多。因此,我们建议寻求在Instagram上开展业务的放射学教育工作者,使用静态图片帖子是接触放射学受众的合适方法,特别是那些通过参与机会(如回答类似诊断测验问题)吸引受众的图片帖子。

相似文献

1
Instagram reels versus image posts in radiology education.放射学教育中Instagram短视频与图像帖子的比较
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2025 Mar-Apr;54(2):170-175. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Radiology on Instagram: Analysis of Public Accounts and Identified Areas for Content Creation.放射科在 Instagram 上:公共账户分析和内容创作领域。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Jan;29(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
4
Characteristics of and User Engagement With Antivaping Posts on Instagram: Observational Study.Instagram 反电子烟帖子的特点和用户参与度:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 25;7(11):e29600. doi: 10.2196/29600.
5
Is a Picture Really Worth More than a Thousand Words? Which Instagram Post Types Elicit the Best Response for Radiology Education.一张图片真的胜过千言万语吗?哪种类型的 Instagram 帖子能为放射科教育带来最佳反响。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Aug;33(4):1053-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00344-y.
6
Lessons learned from rebranding a radiology education facebook page.从放射科教育 Facebook 页面重塑品牌中学到的经验教训。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2024 Nov-Dec;53(6):685-688. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Characterizing Anti-Vaping Posts for Effective Communication on Instagram Using Multimodal Deep Learning.利用多模态深度学习技术对 Instagram 上反电子烟内容进行特征分析以实现有效沟通。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Feb 15;26(Supplement_1):S43-S48. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad189.
8
Radiology Content on TikTok: Current Use of a Novel Video-Based Social Media Platform and Opportunities for Radiology.TikTok 上的放射学内容:新型基于视频的社交媒体平台的当前使用情况及放射学机遇。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;50(2):126-131. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
9
Electronic Cigarette-Related Contents on Instagram: Observational Study and Exploratory Analysis.Instagram 上电子烟相关内容:观察性研究与探索性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 5;6(4):e21963. doi: 10.2196/21963.
10
Analysis of Neurosurgery Influencers on Instagram: Trends and Patterns of the Neurosurgeon's Social Media Footprint.Instagram上神经外科领域有影响力者的分析:神经外科医生社交媒体足迹的趋势与模式
World Neurosurg. 2023 May;173:e422-e430. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.070. Epub 2023 Feb 22.