Suppr超能文献

改良 Mallampati 分级评分与最佳可视 Mallampati 评分预测困难气管插管的比较:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。

Comparison of the modified Mallampati classification score versus the best visible Mallampati score in the prediction of difficult tracheal intubation: a single-centre prospective observational study.

机构信息

Caen Normandy University, Caen, France.

Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU Caen Normandie, Avenue Côte de Nacre, CS 30001, 14000, Caen, France.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;71(10):1353-1362. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02815-0. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The modified Mallampati classification is part of the preoperative airway risk assessment. Inconsistency in the way it is examined may contribute to heterogeneity in its diagnostic performance. The best visible Mallampati score could reduce interobserver heterogeneity but its diagnostic characteristics remain unknown.

METHODS

During preoperative anesthesia consultation of adult patients with a senior anesthesiologist, we compared the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score using cervical extension, tongue in, and phonation. The primary outcome was the diagnostic characteristic of the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score as predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation (more than two direct laryngoscopies or need for an alternate device). We performed a multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation in the tested cohort.

RESULTS

Difficult orotracheal intubation occurred in 77/3,243 (2.4%) patients. A best visible Mallampati score was obtained in 1,596 (49.2%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the modified Mallampati classification score for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation were 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.66) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.71), respectively. By comparison, the best visible Mallampati score was less sensitive (difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.30; P < 0.001) but more specific (difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.22 to -0.25; P < 0.001). In patients with difficult orotracheal intubation, 53% were incorrectly reclassified as low risk by the best visible Mallampati score.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the modified Mallampati classification score, the best visible Mallampati score decreased sensitivity for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation and falsely classified half of the patients with difficult orotracheal intubation. Taking the risks associated with difficult airways into account, our findings indicate that a careful examination of the modified Mallampati classification is required during the global preoperative airway examination.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 February 2016.

摘要

目的

改良的 Mallampati 分类是术前气道风险评估的一部分。在检查方法上的不一致可能导致其诊断性能存在差异。最佳可视 Mallampati 评分可降低观察者间的异质性,但尚不清楚其诊断特征。

方法

在有经验丰富的麻醉师进行术前麻醉咨询时,我们比较了改良 Mallampati 分类评分与颈椎伸展、舌伸、发音时的最佳可视 Mallampati 评分。主要结局是改良 Mallampati 分类评分与最佳可视 Mallampati 评分作为预测困难经口气管插管(超过两次直接喉镜检查或需要替代设备)的诊断特征。我们对测试队列进行了多变量分析,以确定困难经口气管插管的独立预测因素。

结果

77/3243(2.4%)名患者发生困难经口气管插管。1596(49.2%)名患者获得了最佳可视 Mallampati 评分。改良 Mallampati 分类评分预测困难经口气管插管的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.56(95%置信区间,0.44 至 0.66)和 0.69(95%置信区间,0.68 至 0.71)。相比之下,最佳可视 Mallampati 评分的敏感性较低(差异,-0.30;95%置信区间,-0.19 至-0.30;P<0.001),但特异性较高(差异,0.24;95%置信区间,0.22 至-0.25;P<0.001)。在困难经口气管插管患者中,53%的患者被最佳可视 Mallampati 评分错误地重新归类为低风险。

结论

与改良 Mallampati 分类评分相比,最佳可视 Mallampati 评分降低了预测困难经口气管插管的敏感性,并错误地将一半的困难经口气管插管患者分类。考虑到困难气道相关风险,我们的研究结果表明,在进行全面的术前气道检查时,需要仔细检查改良 Mallampati 分类。

研究注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02788253);2016 年 2 月 9 日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验