• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生健康信息素养技能的中介作用:探究网络资源利用与健康信息评估能力之间的关系。

The Mediating Role of Students' Health Information Literacy Skills: Exploring the Relationship Between Web Resource Utilization and Health Information Evaluation Proficiency.

机构信息

Institute of Information Sciences, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14176. doi: 10.1111/hex.14176.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14176
PMID:39148230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11327112/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an increasingly digital age, students rely heavily on web resources to access health information. However, evaluating the reliability and relevance of such information is crucial for informed decision-making. This study examines the importance of students' health information literacy skills (HILS) as mediators, particularly their ability to utilize web resources and successfully evaluate health information.

OBJECTIVES

This research investigates the mediating role of students' HILS in the relationship between their utilization of web resources and their proficiency in evaluating health information.

METHOD

An online survey was distributed to current students at a public university in Bangladesh as part of the data collection process for this study. Using Google Forms, the authors created a structured questionnaire. The survey was distributed through Messenger groups, Facebook pages and email invitations to reach the target audience effectively. The researchers thoroughly analysed the gathered data using structural equation modelling (SEM) techniques and SmartPLS-4 software to look for correlations between the variables.

RESULT

The study revealed that among the 122 participants, a significant number (N = 47) accessed internet health information on an occasional basis, whereas 30 individuals reported using it infrequently. The data revealed that 58 individuals, accounting for 47.5% of the sample, possessed the necessary abilities to access and assess online health information. Additionally, 57 participants, representing 46.7% of the sample, demonstrated proficiency in conducting online health information searches. The measurement model demonstrated good convergent validity, as evidenced by composite reliability (CR) scores and Cronbach's ⍺ values over 0.700 and an average extracted variance (AVE) of 0.500. The structural model demonstrated R values exceeding 0.1, thus validating its dependable forecasting capability. Notable effects were seen, with f values of 0.335 and 0.317 for the challenges in accessing and evaluating health information (CAEHI) to health information evaluation (HIE) and CAEHI to HILS relationships, respectively. The mediation analysis found that HILS act as a mediator between types of web resources (TWRs) and HIE, with TWR having an indirect impact on HIE through HILS.

DISCUSSION

The result supports all hypotheses. Therefore, it is evident that students' HILS mediate the relationship between utilization of web resources and their proficiency in evaluating health information.

CONCLUSION

This study's findings could significantly impact instructional practices meant to raise students' health information literacy. This initiative seeks to enable students to make informed decisions about their health by providing them with the necessary tools to analyse and evaluate health-related information.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Research on health information literacy can assist patients and the general public by instructing them on how to assess trustworthy online health resources. Students gave insightful feedback that assisted in shaping the study and guaranteeing its relevancy. If they better comprehend health information literacy, patients and the general public can use web-based resources and critically evaluate health information more accurately.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/09fa0a77f252/HEX-27-e14176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/408223c6e19f/HEX-27-e14176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/7eaaaa083dc8/HEX-27-e14176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/26a8d1018eb0/HEX-27-e14176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/09fa0a77f252/HEX-27-e14176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/408223c6e19f/HEX-27-e14176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/7eaaaa083dc8/HEX-27-e14176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/26a8d1018eb0/HEX-27-e14176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa81/11327112/09fa0a77f252/HEX-27-e14176-g002.jpg
摘要

背景

在日益数字化的时代,学生们大量依赖网络资源来获取健康信息。然而,评估这些信息的可靠性和相关性对于做出明智的决策至关重要。本研究考察了学生健康信息素养技能(HILS)作为中介的重要性,特别是他们利用网络资源和成功评估健康信息的能力。

目的

本研究调查了学生 HILS 在他们利用网络资源与评估健康信息能力之间的关系中的中介作用。

方法

作为这项研究数据收集过程的一部分,一项在线调查分发给孟加拉国一所公立大学的当前学生。作者使用 Google 表单创建了一个结构化问卷。通过 Messenger 群组、Facebook 页面和电子邮件邀请,有效地向目标受众分发了调查。研究人员使用结构方程建模(SEM)技术和 SmartPLS-4 软件对收集到的数据进行了深入分析,以寻找变量之间的相关性。

结果

研究显示,在 122 名参与者中,有相当数量的人(N=47)偶尔会访问互联网健康信息,而 30 人则表示很少使用。数据显示,58 人,占样本的 47.5%,具备获取和评估在线健康信息的必要能力。此外,57 名参与者,占样本的 46.7%,表现出在进行在线健康信息搜索方面的熟练程度。测量模型表现出良好的收敛有效性,证据是综合可靠性(CR)得分和 Cronbach 的 ⍺ 值均超过 0.700,平均提取方差(AVE)为 0.500。结构模型显示 R 值超过 0.1,从而验证了其可靠的预测能力。注意到在获取和评估健康信息(CAEHI)与健康信息评估(HIE)和 CAEHI 与 HILS 关系之间,挑战的 f 值分别为 0.335 和 0.317,具有显著影响。中介分析发现 HILS 在 TWR 和 HIE 之间起到了中介作用,TWR 通过 HILS 对 HIE 产生了间接影响。

讨论

结果支持所有假设。因此,很明显,学生的 HILS 中介了他们利用网络资源与评估健康信息能力之间的关系。

结论

这项研究的结果可能会对旨在提高学生健康信息素养的教学实践产生重大影响。这项倡议旨在通过向学生提供分析和评估与健康相关信息所需的工具,使他们能够就自己的健康做出明智的决策。

患者或公众的贡献

健康信息素养的研究可以通过指导患者和公众评估可信赖的在线健康资源来帮助他们。学生提供了有见地的反馈,帮助塑造了研究并确保其相关性。如果他们更好地理解健康信息素养,患者和公众可以更准确地使用基于网络的资源并批判性地评估健康信息。

相似文献

1
The Mediating Role of Students' Health Information Literacy Skills: Exploring the Relationship Between Web Resource Utilization and Health Information Evaluation Proficiency.学生健康信息素养技能的中介作用:探究网络资源利用与健康信息评估能力之间的关系。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14176. doi: 10.1111/hex.14176.
2
Digital Health Literacy and Web-Based Information-Seeking Behaviors of University Students in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠疫情期间德国大学生的数字健康素养和基于网络的信息搜索行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 15;23(1):e24097. doi: 10.2196/24097.
3
eHealth Literacy and Web-Based Health Information-Seeking Behaviors on COVID-19 in Japan: Internet-Based Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养与日本 COVID-19 期间的网络健康信息搜索行为:基于互联网的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 11;26:e57842. doi: 10.2196/57842.
4
Factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation rebuttal among college students: a descriptive study.与大学生 COVID-19 错误信息反驳相关的因素:一项描述性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;11:1233414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233414. eCollection 2023.
5
Digital health literacy, online information-seeking behaviour, and satisfaction of Covid-19 information among the university students of East and South-East Asia.东亚和东南亚大学生的数字健康素养、在线信息搜索行为以及对新冠疫情信息的满意度。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 13;17(4):e0266276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266276. eCollection 2022.
6
Validation of the digital health literacy assessment among the university students in China.中国大学生数字健康素养评估的验证。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;11:1294183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1294183. eCollection 2023.
7
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
8
Differences in digital health literacy and future anxiety between health care and other university students in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间医护生与非医护大学生的数字健康素养和未来焦虑差异。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13087-y.
9
Internet Use, eHealth Literacy, and Dietary Supplement Use Among Young Adults in Pakistan: Cross-Sectional Study.巴基斯坦年轻人的互联网使用、电子健康素养与膳食补充剂使用情况:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 10;22(6):e17014. doi: 10.2196/17014.
10
Effective use of online COVID-19 information and eHealth information literacy among US university students.美国大学生对在线 COVID-19 信息和电子健康信息素养的有效利用。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jul;72(5):1458-1465. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2080505. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating E-Health Literacy, Knowledge, Attitude, and Health Online Information in Portuguese University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估葡萄牙大学生的电子健康素养、知识、态度和在线健康信息:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;21(3):271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030271.
2
Digital health literacy and associated factors among internet users from China: a cross-sectional study.数字健康素养及其在中国互联网用户中的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18324-0.
3
Health Literacy Among Non-Communicable Disease Service Seekers: A Nationwide Finding from Primary Health Care Settings of Bangladesh.
非传染性疾病服务寻求者的健康素养:来自孟加拉国初级卫生保健机构的全国性发现。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jan;8(1):e12-e20. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240119-01. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
4
Digital Health Literacy and Web-Based Health Information-Seeking Behaviors in the Saudi Arabian Population.沙特阿拉伯人群的数字健康素养与基于网络的健康信息寻求行为
Cureus. 2023 Dec 26;15(12):e51125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51125. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Improving Patient Outcomes Through Effective Hospital Administration: A Comprehensive Review.通过有效的医院管理改善患者治疗效果:全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47731. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Skills and competencies in health data analytics for health professionals: a scoping review protocol.卫生专业人员健康数据分析技能和能力:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e070596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070596.
7
Developing a questionnaire to evaluate the health information literacy in China.开发一个评估中国健康信息素养的问卷。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;11:1068648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1068648. eCollection 2023.
8
Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.医疗保健领域的数字化转型:技术接受及其应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043407.
9
Evidence-based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment: Findings from a scoping review.循证实践可改善患者预后和医疗体系投资回报:来自范围综述的研究结果。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023 Feb;20(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12621. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Professional Competence and Its Effect on the Implementation of Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Future Research Directions.专业能力及其对医疗保健 4.0 技术实施的影响:范围综述和未来研究方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010478.