Suppr超能文献

工作记忆机制对即时测试和延迟测试中错误记忆的影响。

The influence of working memory mechanisms on false memories in immediate and delayed tests.

机构信息

Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Cognition. 2024 Nov;252:105901. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105901. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

Abstract

There is growing evidence that false memories can occur in working memory (WM) tasks with only a few semantically related words and seconds between study and test. Abadie and Camos (2019) proposed a new model to explain the formation of false memories by describing the role of articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing, the two main mechanisms for actively maintaining information in WM. However, this model has only been tested in recognition tasks. In the present study, we report four experiments testing the model in recall tasks in which the active maintenance of information in WM plays a more important role for retrieval. Short lists of semantically related items were held for a short retention interval filled with a concurrent task that either impaired or not the use of each of the WM maintenance mechanisms. Participants were asked to recall the items immediately after the concurrent task (immediate test) or later, at the end of a block of several trials (delayed test). In the immediate test, semantic errors were more frequent when WM maintenance was impaired. Specifically, rehearsal prevented the occurrence of semantic errors in the immediate test, while refreshing had no effect on their occurrence in this test, but increased semantic errors produced only in the delayed test. These results support Abadie and Camos (2019) model and go further by demonstrating the role of active information maintenance in WM in the emergence of false memories. The implications of these findings for understanding WM-LTM relationships are discussed.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,在工作记忆 (WM) 任务中,仅通过几个语义相关的单词和在学习和测试之间几秒钟的时间,就会产生错误记忆。Abadie 和 Camos (2019) 提出了一个新模型,通过描述发音复述和注意力刷新这两个主要的 WM 信息主动维持机制的作用,来解释错误记忆的形成。然而,该模型仅在识别任务中得到了测试。在本研究中,我们报告了四项实验,在回忆任务中测试了该模型,其中 WM 中信息的主动维持对于检索起着更重要的作用。短的语义相关项目列表在保留间隔内保持很短的时间,同时进行一个会干扰或不干扰每个 WM 维持机制的并发任务。参与者被要求在并发任务后立即(即时测试)或稍后在几个试验块结束时(延迟测试)回忆项目。在即时测试中,当 WM 维持受到干扰时,语义错误更为频繁。具体来说,复述防止了即时测试中语义错误的发生,而刷新对即时测试中语义错误的发生没有影响,但增加了仅在延迟测试中产生的语义错误。这些结果支持了 Abadie 和 Camos (2019) 的模型,并通过演示 WM 中主动信息维持在错误记忆产生中的作用,更进一步。讨论了这些发现对理解 WM-LTM 关系的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验