Center for Outcomes and Assessment Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ.
Center for Outcomes and Assessment Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2118-2126. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
To develop composite measures of neighborhood economic factors for use with the national Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMSs) database in cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations of the social determinants of health.
Secondary data analysis of administrative data from the 2009, 2014, and 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates and survey data collected for the SCIMS database.
Community.
The validity of the neighborhood economic measures developed from the ACS data was tested with a sample of SCIMS participants who completed a follow-up interview between 2017 and 2021 (N=8,130). The predictive validity of the neighborhood measures was assessed with a subsample of cases with complete data on the outcome and covariate measures (N=6,457).
Not applicable.
A binary measure of self-rated health status (1=poor/fair health; 0=good/very good/excellent).
A combination of panel review and data reduction techniques yielded 2 distinct measuring neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage that were validated using 3 waves of ACS data and the SCIMS data. The odds of reporting poor health were lower among people living in moderate- and high-SES neighborhoods and highest among people living in moderately and highly disadvantaged neighborhoods. The negative association between neighborhood SES and poor health was fully attenuated by differences in participants' individual demographic and economic characteristics whereas the positive association between neighborhood disadvantage and poor health persisted after adjusting for individual differences.
The two composite measures of neighborhood economic factors developed by this study are robust in samples from different periods of time and valid for use with the SCIMS database. Future investigations conducting surveillance of the needs of the SCI population using this resource may consider using these measures to assess the effect of the social determinants of health in outcomes after SCI.
开发用于国家脊髓损伤模型系统 (SCIMS) 数据库的邻里经济因素综合衡量标准,以在横断面和纵向研究健康的社会决定因素。
对 2009 年、2014 年和 2019 年美国社区调查(ACS)5 年估计的行政数据和 SCIMS 数据库收集的调查数据进行二次数据分析。
社区。
使用在 2017 年至 2021 年期间完成随访访谈的 SCIMS 参与者样本(N=8130),对从 ACS 数据中开发的邻里经济措施的有效性进行了测试。使用具有完整结局和协变量测量数据的子样本(N=6457)评估了邻里措施的预测有效性。
不适用。
自我报告的健康状况的二分测量(1=差/差;0=好/非常好/极好)。
面板审查和数据简化技术的组合产生了 2 种不同的衡量邻里社会经济地位(SES)和邻里社会经济劣势的方法,这些方法通过 3 波 ACS 数据和 SCIMS 数据得到验证。居住在中高 SES 社区的人报告健康状况较差的可能性较低,而居住在中高劣势社区的人报告健康状况较差的可能性最高。邻里 SES 与健康状况不佳之间的负相关关系在参与者个体人口统计学和经济特征差异下完全减弱,而邻里劣势与健康状况不佳之间的正相关关系在调整个体差异后仍然存在。
本研究开发的两种邻里经济因素综合衡量标准在不同时期的样本中具有稳健性,可用于 SCIMS 数据库。未来使用该资源进行脊髓损伤人群需求监测的研究可能会考虑使用这些措施来评估健康的社会决定因素对脊髓损伤后结局的影响。