比较坐姿体前屈与改良坐姿体前屈在测量青少年柔韧性方面的差异。
Comparing the Sit and Reach with the Modified Sit and Reach in Measuring Flexibility in Adolescents.
作者信息
Hoeger Werner W K, Hopkins David R, Button Sherman, Palmer Troy A
机构信息
Dept. of Physical Education at Boise State University, Boise, ID 83707, USA.
Dept. of Physical Education at Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA.
出版信息
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1990 May;2(2):156-162. doi: 10.1123/pes.2.2.156.
This study compared the proposed modified sit and reach test (MSR) and the commonly administered sit and reach test (SR) to determine if the MSR can administratively control possible limb-length biases. Subjects (N=258) were administered two trials of each test. The MSR test incorporates a finger-to-box distance (FBD) to account for proportional differences between legs and arms. Individuals with high FBD measurements demonstrated a poorer performance on the SR test. An analysis of the subjects failing to meet the Physical Best standard (25 cm) indicated a higher probability of failure for those with larger FBD scores. The subjects were subsequently separated into three groups: high, medium, and low FBD. There were no significant difference among the groups on MSR performance but a significant difference was found on SR performance. The MSR test appears to eliminate the concern of disproportionate limb-length bias expressed by many practitioners.
本研究比较了提议的改良坐位体前屈测试（MSR）和常用的坐位体前屈测试（SR），以确定MSR是否能在管理上控制可能存在的肢体长度偏差。对258名受试者进行了每项测试的两次试验。MSR测试纳入了手指到箱子的距离（FBD），以考虑腿和手臂之间的比例差异。FBD测量值高的个体在SR测试中的表现较差。对未达到“体能最佳”标准（25厘米）的受试者进行的分析表明，FBD分数较高者失败的可能性更大。随后，受试者被分为三组：高、中、低FBD组。三组在MSR测试表现上无显著差异，但在SR测试表现上存在显著差异。MSR测试似乎消除了许多从业者对肢体长度不成比例偏差的担忧。
Zotero 插件