• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从烟雾到微笑:量化家庭烹饪能源转型的幸福收益。

From smoke to smiles: Quantifying the happiness benefits of household cooking energy transition.

机构信息

School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250000, China.

School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250000, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;368:122203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122203. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122203
PMID:39153320
Abstract

Existing studies that assess the impact of cooking with dirty solid fuels on human beings tend to underestimate the adverse impact on welfare. This paper aims to address this research gap by examining the happiness benefits of transitioning from solid fuel to cleaner alternatives. Using an extensive panel dataset from China, which includes 150,248 observations collected from 43,251 survey respondents interviewed between 2010 and 2018, this study employs various complementary methodologies, such as the fixed-effect model, propensity score matching, and time-varying difference-in-differences, to overcome challenges related to treatment selection bias and unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity. Further, life satisfaction approach is used to evaluate the economic benefits of cooking energy transition. Our findings indicate that switching from firewood to LPG/natural gas/gas can significantly enhance individual subjective well-being (SWB). Although the improvement brought about by electricity is slightly lower than that of LPG/natural gas/gas, it remains substantial. Notably, the positive effect is more pronounced among specific demographic groups, including females, rural residents, and low-income families. Moreover, these well-being improvements can manifest quickly and persist many years before any noticeable enhancements in physical health. This effect further amplifies over time. However, biogas shows no significant effect on SWB. These findings underscore the importance of clean fuels that contribute to increased happiness, as they are more likely to be consistently adopted. Finally, we estimate that the economic benefits of the well-being improvements resulting from the use of LPG/natural gas/gas and electricity range between $5.15 and $5.44 per day.

摘要

现有研究评估了使用脏污固体燃料烹饪对人类的影响,这些研究往往低估了对福利的不利影响。本文旨在通过研究从固体燃料向更清洁替代品过渡对幸福感的影响来弥补这一研究空白。本文利用中国一个广泛的面板数据集,该数据集包含 2010 年至 2018 年间对 43251 名受访者进行的 150248 次观察,采用固定效应模型、倾向得分匹配和时变差分等多种补充方法,克服了与处理选择偏差和不可观测的时不变异质性相关的挑战。此外,还采用生活满意度方法来评估烹饪能源转型的经济效益。研究结果表明,从薪柴转换为液化石油气/天然气/煤气可以显著提高个人的主观幸福感(SWB)。虽然电的改善程度略低于液化石油气/天然气/煤气,但仍相当可观。值得注意的是,这种积极影响在特定的人口群体中更为明显,包括女性、农村居民和低收入家庭。此外,这些幸福感的提升可以在几年内迅速显现,并在任何明显的身体健康改善之前持续多年。这种效应随着时间的推移进一步放大。然而,沼气对 SWB 没有显著影响。这些发现强调了清洁燃料的重要性,因为它们更有可能被持续采用,从而提高幸福感。最后,我们估计使用液化石油气/天然气/煤气和电所带来的幸福感提升的经济效益在每天 5.15 美元至 5.44 美元之间。

相似文献

1
From smoke to smiles: Quantifying the happiness benefits of household cooking energy transition.从烟雾到微笑:量化家庭烹饪能源转型的幸福收益。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;368:122203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122203. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis印度哈里亚纳邦的家庭能源干预措施与健康和财务状况:一项扩展的成本效益分析
4
Why energy access is not enough for choosing clean cooking fuels? Evidence from the multinomial logit model.为什么能源获取不足以选择清洁烹饪燃料?来自多项逻辑回归模型的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112539. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112539. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Fuel for Life: Domestic Cooking Fuels and Women's Health in Rural China.生命的燃料:中国农村家庭烹饪燃料与妇女健康
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 10;13(8):810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080810.
6
Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use.资源匮乏地区的清洁燃料:对采用和持续使用的障碍及促进因素的系统评价
Environ Res. 2016 Apr;146:218-34. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Substitution strategies for cooking energy: To use gas or electricity?烹饪能源替代策略:用煤气还是电?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114135. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
8
Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking.厄瓜多尔城乡结合部和农村地区的家庭燃料组合:解读液化石油气的背景、持续使用柴火的模式以及电磁炉烹饪面临的挑战。
Energy Policy. 2020 Jan;136. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111053. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Household Air Pollution from Solid Cookfuels and Its Effects on Health固体燃料造成的家庭空气污染及其对健康的影响
10
The Gendered Nature of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Adoption and Use in Rural India.印度农村地区采用和使用液化石油气炉灶的性别差异
J Dev Stud. 2020;56(7):1309-1329. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1657571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of short video usage on the mental health of elderly people.短视频使用对老年人心理健康的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 31;12(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02125-6.