• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌筛查的经济学评价:系统评价方案

Economic evaluations of pancreatic cancer screening: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e087003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087003.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087003
PMID:39153777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331839/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The early detection of pancreatic cancer is an important step in reducing mortality by offering patients curative treatment. Screening strategies in risk populations and by means of different detection methods have been economically evaluated. However, a synthesis of screening studies to inform resource allocation towards early detection within the disease area has not been done. Therefore, studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness and costs of screening for pancreatic cancer should be systematically reviewed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review of economic evaluations reporting the cost-effectiveness or costs of pancreatic cancer screening will be conducted. The electronic databases Medline, Web of Science and EconLit will be searched without geographical or time restrictions. Two independent reviewers will select eligible studies based on predefined criteria. The study quality will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and the Bias in Economic Evaluation checklist. One reviewer will extract relevant data and a second reviewer will cross-check compliance with the extraction sheet. Key items will include characteristics of screened individuals, the screening strategies used, and costs, health effects and cost-effectiveness as study outputs. Differences of opinion between the reviewers will be solved by consulting a third reviewer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through presentations at conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The results of the systematic review will inform future economic evaluations of pancreatic screening, which provide guidance for decision-making in healthcare resource prioritisation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023475348.

摘要

简介

通过为患者提供治愈性治疗,早期发现胰腺癌对于降低死亡率至关重要。已经对高危人群和通过不同检测方法进行的筛查策略进行了经济评估。然而,尚未综合筛查研究来为疾病领域的早期检测提供资源分配信息。因此,应系统地审查评估胰腺癌筛查的成本效益和成本的研究。

方法和分析

将对报告胰腺癌筛查的成本效益或成本的经济评估进行系统综述。将无地理和时间限制地在电子数据库 Medline、Web of Science 和 EconLit 中进行搜索。两名独立的审查员将根据预设标准选择合格的研究。使用合并健康经济评估报告标准声明和经济评估偏差清单评估研究质量。一名审查员将提取相关数据,第二名审查员将交叉检查提取表的合规性。关键项目将包括筛查个体的特征、使用的筛查策略以及作为研究结果的成本、健康效果和成本效益。审查员之间的意见分歧将通过咨询第三名审查员来解决。

伦理和传播

由于本研究不收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过会议演示和在同行评议期刊上发表来传播。系统综述的结果将为未来的胰腺癌筛查经济评估提供信息,为医疗保健资源优先排序的决策提供指导。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023475348。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aee6/11331839/4565e394e2c2/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aee6/11331839/4565e394e2c2/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aee6/11331839/4565e394e2c2/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluations of pancreatic cancer screening: a systematic review protocol.胰腺癌筛查的经济学评价:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e087003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087003.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A comparison of international modelling methods to evaluate health economics of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review protocol.比较国际建模方法评估结直肠癌筛查的卫生经济学:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02173-w.
4
Cost-effectiveness of oral anticancer drugs and associated individualised dosing approaches in patients with cancer: protocol for a systematic review.癌症患者口服抗癌药物的成本效益及相关个体化给药方法的系统评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e047173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047173.
5
Systematic review of economic analyses in patient safety: a protocol designed to measure development in the scope and quality of evidence.患者安全经济分析的系统评价:一项旨在衡量证据范围和质量发展的方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e017089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017089.
6
Protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations of preoperative smoking cessation interventions for preventing surgical complications.术前戒烟干预预防手术并发症的经济评价系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e057171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057171.
7
Cost-effectiveness of falls prevention strategies for older adults: protocol for a living systematic review.老年人跌倒预防策略的成本效益:一项实时系统综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 5;14(11):e088536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088536.
8
Economic evaluations of scaling up strategies of evidence-based health interventions: a systematic review protocol.经济评价扩大基于证据的卫生干预策略的实施:系统综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e050838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050838.
9
Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review.经济评估在一般风险人群中对结直肠癌的早期检测的筛查策略:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227251. eCollection 2019.
10
Protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted on gender-transformative interventions aimed at preventing unintended pregnancy and promoting sexual health in adolescents.旨在预防青少年意外怀孕和促进性健康的性别转换干预措施的经济评价的系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e056553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056553.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.胰腺癌早期检测策略的经济学评估:一项系统综述
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01793-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening of pancreatic cancer: Target population, optimal timing and how?胰腺癌的筛查:目标人群、最佳时机及方式?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Nov 5;84:104814. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104814. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.转移性胰腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:一项系统文献综述
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Dec 6;14:3383-3403. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S376261. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of pancreatic cancer screening on life expectancy: A systematic review of modeling studies.
胰腺癌筛查对预期寿命的影响:系统综述模型研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Apr 15;152(8):1570-1580. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34379. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Model-based screening for pancreatic cancer in Sweden.基于模型的瑞典胰腺癌筛查。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 May;58(5):534-541. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2142481. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Z Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov;60(11):e812-e909. doi: 10.1055/a-1856-7346. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Economic Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: a Literature Review.欧洲胰腺癌的经济负担:文献综述。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Jun;54(2):391-407. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00821-3. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
Quality of life after pancreatic surgery - A systematic review.胰腺手术后的生活质量 - 系统评价。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Aug;24(8):1223-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
8
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 12;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02204-0.
9
The Current Treatment Paradigm for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Barriers to Therapeutic Efficacy.胰腺导管腺癌的当前治疗模式及治疗效果的障碍
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 15;11:688377. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688377. eCollection 2021.
10
Projected economic burden of pancreatic cancer in Sweden in 2030.2030 年瑞典胰腺癌预估经济负担。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Jul;60(7):866-871. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892821. Epub 2021 Mar 17.