• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同泰国唇腭裂人群的先天缺牙和多生牙的患病率。

Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Oral Health Care Center for Geriatrics and Special Needs, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3
PMID:39153972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330041/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type.

METHODS

Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.

摘要

背景

在唇腭裂患者中遇到的牙齿异常模式显示出遗传参与的微妙迹象。本研究旨在根据唇腭裂类型评估泰国唇腭裂人群中牙齿缺失和多生牙的发生率和模式。

方法

对 2012 年至 2022 年期间在泰国孔敬大学塔旺猜唇腭裂中心接受治疗的唇腭裂患者的数据进行了调查。符合纳入标准的 194 例非综合征性唇腭裂患者的记录被纳入研究。对标准牙科记录进行了检查,并且至少对全景片(OPG)或锥形束 CT(CBCT)进行了检查。使用卡方检验和二项式检验(p≤0.05)进行统计分析。

结果

牙齿缺失的发生率(77.3%)高于多生牙(5.7%),双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)(88.1%)高于单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)(72.6%)(p=0.017)。上颌侧切牙(46.4%)更常受到影响,其次是上颌第二前磨牙。左侧缺失的牙齿数量明显更高。左侧 UCLP(ULCLP)患者牙齿缺失的发生率最高。共发现 41 种牙齿缺失模式(TAC)。多生牙的发生率在 ULCLP 中为 6.6%,BCLP 中为 5.1%,URCLP 中为 4.5%。牙齿数量异常在 BCLP 中更为常见,最有可能发生在上颌骨的左侧。两种类型的异常都可能在一小部分唇腭裂患者中出现。

结论

本研究中,超过一半的非综合征性唇腭裂患者存在牙齿数量异常。牙齿缺失的发生率约为多生牙的 10 倍。牙齿缺失更可能出现在上颌骨的左侧,而与唇腭裂的侧别无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde6/11330041/767e5b73dff1/12903_2024_4719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde6/11330041/767e5b73dff1/12903_2024_4719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde6/11330041/767e5b73dff1/12903_2024_4719_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.不同泰国唇腭裂人群的先天缺牙和多生牙的患病率。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3.
2
Prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in a German cleft lip with/without palate population.德国唇裂伴/不伴腭裂人群中先天性缺牙和额外牙的患病率。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01420-7.
3
Maxillary dental anomalies in patients with cleft lip and palate: a cone beam computed tomography study.唇腭裂患者的上颌牙齿异常:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Winter;39(2):183-6. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.t623u7495h07522r.
4
Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧完全性唇腭裂及双侧完全性唇腭裂患者的牙发育不全编码(TAC)
Odontology. 2018 Jul;106(3):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0332-3. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Teeth agenesis evaluation in an Italian sample of complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.意大利单侧和双侧完全性唇腭裂患者样本中的牙齿发育不全评估
Minerva Stomatol. 2018 Aug;67(4):156-164. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.18.04114-6. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Cleft palate with/without cleft lip in French children: radiographic evaluation of prevalence, location and coexistence of dental anomalies inside and outside cleft region.法国儿童的唇裂/腭裂:裂隙区内外牙畸形的发生率、部位和共存的放射学评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):689-695. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2141-z. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
Secondary Dentition Characteristics in Children With Nonsyndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Study.非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患儿的恒牙列特征:一项回顾性研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Apr;55(4):582-589. doi: 10.1177/1055665617750489. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Tooth agenesis patterns in unilateral cleft lip and palate in humans.人类单侧唇裂腭裂的牙齿缺失模式。
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Jun;58(6):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
Prevalence of dental anomalies of number in different subphenotypes of isolated cleft palate.孤立性腭裂不同亚表型中牙齿数目异常的患病率。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):55-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.055-059.oar.
10
Correlation of Dental Anomalies with Cleft Type and Gender in Non-Syndromic Oral Cleft Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.非综合征性口腔裂患者的牙颌畸形与裂隙类型和性别的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Feb;61(2):284-294. doi: 10.1177/10556656221127536. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-cell RNA-seq of in vitro expanded cells from cranial neural crest reveals a rare odontogenic sub-population.颅神经嵴体外扩增细胞的单细胞 RNA 测序揭示了一个罕见的牙源性亚群。
Cell Prolif. 2024 Jun;57(6):e13598. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13598. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
2
The genetic basis of hypodontia in dental development.牙齿发育中先天性缺牙的遗传学基础。
Br Dent J. 2023 Oct;235(7):525-528. doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6384-6. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Oral health-related quality of life in patients aged 8 to 19 years with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
8 至 19 岁唇腭裂患者的口腔健康相关生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03382-4.
4
Transcriptome analyses of murine right and left maxilla-mandibular complex.左右上颌骨-下颌骨复合体的鼠类转录组分析。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Dec;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12660. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Understanding laterality disorders and the left-right organizer: Insights from zebrafish.了解左右侧发育障碍与左右组织者:来自斑马鱼的见解
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Dec 23;10:1035513. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1035513. eCollection 2022.
6
The clinical and genetic findings in a Chinese family with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome.一个患有阿克森费尔德-里格尔综合征的中国家庭的临床和基因研究结果。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 25;8(12):e12543. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12543. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Tooth number abnormality: from bench to bedside.牙齿数目异常:从基础到临床。
Int J Oral Sci. 2023 Jan 6;15(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00208-x.
8
Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Taiwanese Children with Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate.台湾唇腭裂儿童牙齿异常的患病率。
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 13;12(10):1708. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101708.
9
Tooth abnormalities associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: systematic review and meta-analysis.与非综合征性唇腭裂相关的牙齿异常:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Aug;26(8):5089-5103. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04540-8. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).基于牙齿发育不全编码(TAC)的非综合征性口面部裂隙患者的亚表型
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;9(3):437. doi: 10.3390/children9030437.