文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于牙齿发育不全编码(TAC)的非综合征性口面部裂隙患者的亚表型

Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).

作者信息

Konstantonis Dimitrios, Nassika Maria, Athanasiou Maria, Vastardis Heleni

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-115 27 Athens, Greece.

Athensbestsmiles, In Private Practice of Orthodontics, 49 Alopekis, GR-106 76 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;9(3):437. doi: 10.3390/children9030437.


DOI:10.3390/children9030437
PMID:35327809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8947475/
Abstract

Background: It was the aim of this study to investigate tooth agenesis patterns, which are expressed to different subphenotypes according to the TAC method in a spectrum of non-syndromic orofacial cleft patients. Methods: A total of 183 orofacial cleft patient records were assessed for tooth agenesis and TAC patterns. The association between TAC and sex, and cleft type was examined, and logistic regression models were additionally applied. Additionally, the distribution of missing teeth by cleft type and the tooth agenesis inter-quadrant association were examined. Results: The most frequent cleft type was CLPL (n = 72; 39.3%), while the maxillary left lateral incisor was the most frequently missing tooth that was strongly dependent on the cleft type (29.5%, p < 0.001). Of the 31 TAC patterns identified, four were the most prevalent and occurred in 80.8% of the sample, while 20 TAC patterns were unique. Cleft type contrary to sex (p = 0.405) was found to play a significant role in TAC distribution (p = 0.001). The logistic regression’s results suggested that overall, neither sex nor cleft type were associated with tooth agenesis. Prevalence of tooth agenesis in each quadrant clearly depended on cleft type; and there was a strong association found between tooth agenesis in different quadrants. Conclusions: Thirty-one different subphenotypes were identified in TAC patterns. The first four TAC patterns accounted for the 80.8% of the sample’s variability while twenty of the patterns were unique. A strong association was present between TAC pattern and cleft type. No association was found between the sex of the patient, tooth agenesis and TAC patterns. Tooth agenesis depended strongly on the cleft type, and the most frequently missing tooth was the maxillary left lateral incisor. The interquadrant association for tooth agenesis found suggests a genetic link in the etiology of clefts.

摘要

背景:本研究旨在调查牙齿发育不全模式,根据TAC方法,这些模式在一系列非综合征性口腔颌面部裂隙患者中表现为不同的亚表型。方法:共评估了183例口腔颌面部裂隙患者的牙齿发育不全和TAC模式记录。检查了TAC与性别、裂隙类型之间的关联,并额外应用了逻辑回归模型。此外,还检查了按裂隙类型缺失牙齿的分布情况以及牙齿发育不全的象限间关联。结果:最常见的裂隙类型是CLPL(n = 72;39.3%),而上颌左侧侧切牙是最常缺失的牙齿,这与裂隙类型密切相关(29.5%,p < 0.001)。在确定的31种TAC模式中,有4种最为普遍,占样本的80.8%,而20种TAC模式是独特的。发现与性别相反,裂隙类型在TAC分布中起显著作用(p = 0.001),而性别对TAC分布无显著影响(p = 0.405)。逻辑回归结果表明,总体而言,性别和裂隙类型均与牙齿发育不全无关。每个象限中牙齿发育不全的患病率明显取决于裂隙类型;并且在不同象限的牙齿发育不全之间发现了强烈的关联。结论:在TAC模式中确定了31种不同的亚表型。前四种TAC模式占样本变异性的80.8%,而其中20种模式是独特的。TAC模式与裂隙类型之间存在强烈关联。未发现患者性别、牙齿发育不全与TAC模式之间存在关联。牙齿发育不全强烈依赖于裂隙类型,最常缺失的牙齿是上颌左侧侧切牙。发现的牙齿发育不全的象限间关联提示了腭裂病因中的遗传联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/504e0d26711e/children-09-00437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/b5e85dc113e4/children-09-00437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/504e0d26711e/children-09-00437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/b5e85dc113e4/children-09-00437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).

Children (Basel). 2022-3-20

[2]
Tooth agenesis patterns in unilateral cleft lip and palate in humans.

Arch Oral Biol. 2013-1-5

[3]
Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.

BMC Oral Health. 2024-8-17

[4]
Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with orofacial clefts.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2013-8

[5]
Tooth agenesis in German orthodontic patients with non-syndromic craniofacial disorder: a retrospective evaluation of panoramic radiographs.

Clin Oral Investig. 2022-9

[6]
A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients.

Prog Orthod. 2017-6-25

[7]
Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Odontology. 2018-7

[8]
Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis.

Dent J (Basel). 2022-7-5

[9]
Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among patients aged 12-22 years: A retrospective study.

Korean J Orthod. 2021-9-25

[10]
Tooth agenesis patterns in bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2010-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.

BMC Oral Health. 2024-8-17

[2]
Global Trends and Hotspots in Research on Tooth Agenesis: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis.

Cureus. 2023-10-13

[3]
Characterization of SHH, SOX3, WNT3A and WNT9B Proteins in Human Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate Tissue.

Dent J (Basel). 2023-6-9

[4]
Novel Candidate Genes for Non-Syndromic Tooth Agenesis Identified Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.

J Clin Med. 2022-10-15

[5]
Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis.

Dent J (Basel). 2022-7-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Genetic models and approaches to study orofacial clefts.

Oral Dis. 2022-7

[2]
Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate: An Executive Summary.

J Clin Med. 2021-10-20

[3]
Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022-4

[4]
Gene-environment interactions: aligning birth defects research with complex etiology.

Development. 2020-7-17

[5]
Genetic analysis: Wnt and other pathways in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis.

Oral Dis. 2018-7-23

[6]
Whole exome sequencing identifies mutations in 10% of patients with familial non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate in genes mutated in well-known syndromes.

J Med Genet. 2018-3-2

[7]
Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Odontology. 2018-7

[8]
Small-molecule Wnt agonists correct cleft palates in mutant mice .

Development. 2017-10-15

[9]
A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients.

Prog Orthod. 2017-6-25

[10]
Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study.

BMC Oral Health. 2017-3-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索