• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于牙齿发育不全编码(TAC)的非综合征性口面部裂隙患者的亚表型

Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).

作者信息

Konstantonis Dimitrios, Nassika Maria, Athanasiou Maria, Vastardis Heleni

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-115 27 Athens, Greece.

Athensbestsmiles, In Private Practice of Orthodontics, 49 Alopekis, GR-106 76 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;9(3):437. doi: 10.3390/children9030437.

DOI:10.3390/children9030437
PMID:35327809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8947475/
Abstract

Background: It was the aim of this study to investigate tooth agenesis patterns, which are expressed to different subphenotypes according to the TAC method in a spectrum of non-syndromic orofacial cleft patients. Methods: A total of 183 orofacial cleft patient records were assessed for tooth agenesis and TAC patterns. The association between TAC and sex, and cleft type was examined, and logistic regression models were additionally applied. Additionally, the distribution of missing teeth by cleft type and the tooth agenesis inter-quadrant association were examined. Results: The most frequent cleft type was CLPL (n = 72; 39.3%), while the maxillary left lateral incisor was the most frequently missing tooth that was strongly dependent on the cleft type (29.5%, p < 0.001). Of the 31 TAC patterns identified, four were the most prevalent and occurred in 80.8% of the sample, while 20 TAC patterns were unique. Cleft type contrary to sex (p = 0.405) was found to play a significant role in TAC distribution (p = 0.001). The logistic regression’s results suggested that overall, neither sex nor cleft type were associated with tooth agenesis. Prevalence of tooth agenesis in each quadrant clearly depended on cleft type; and there was a strong association found between tooth agenesis in different quadrants. Conclusions: Thirty-one different subphenotypes were identified in TAC patterns. The first four TAC patterns accounted for the 80.8% of the sample’s variability while twenty of the patterns were unique. A strong association was present between TAC pattern and cleft type. No association was found between the sex of the patient, tooth agenesis and TAC patterns. Tooth agenesis depended strongly on the cleft type, and the most frequently missing tooth was the maxillary left lateral incisor. The interquadrant association for tooth agenesis found suggests a genetic link in the etiology of clefts.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查牙齿发育不全模式,根据TAC方法,这些模式在一系列非综合征性口腔颌面部裂隙患者中表现为不同的亚表型。方法:共评估了183例口腔颌面部裂隙患者的牙齿发育不全和TAC模式记录。检查了TAC与性别、裂隙类型之间的关联,并额外应用了逻辑回归模型。此外,还检查了按裂隙类型缺失牙齿的分布情况以及牙齿发育不全的象限间关联。结果:最常见的裂隙类型是CLPL(n = 72;39.3%),而上颌左侧侧切牙是最常缺失的牙齿,这与裂隙类型密切相关(29.5%,p < 0.001)。在确定的31种TAC模式中,有4种最为普遍,占样本的80.8%,而20种TAC模式是独特的。发现与性别相反,裂隙类型在TAC分布中起显著作用(p = 0.001),而性别对TAC分布无显著影响(p = 0.405)。逻辑回归结果表明,总体而言,性别和裂隙类型均与牙齿发育不全无关。每个象限中牙齿发育不全的患病率明显取决于裂隙类型;并且在不同象限的牙齿发育不全之间发现了强烈的关联。结论:在TAC模式中确定了31种不同的亚表型。前四种TAC模式占样本变异性的80.8%,而其中20种模式是独特的。TAC模式与裂隙类型之间存在强烈关联。未发现患者性别、牙齿发育不全与TAC模式之间存在关联。牙齿发育不全强烈依赖于裂隙类型,最常缺失的牙齿是上颌左侧侧切牙。发现的牙齿发育不全的象限间关联提示了腭裂病因中的遗传联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/504e0d26711e/children-09-00437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/b5e85dc113e4/children-09-00437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/504e0d26711e/children-09-00437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/b5e85dc113e4/children-09-00437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd69/8947475/a8a2632420b7/children-09-00437-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).基于牙齿发育不全编码(TAC)的非综合征性口面部裂隙患者的亚表型
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;9(3):437. doi: 10.3390/children9030437.
2
Tooth agenesis patterns in unilateral cleft lip and palate in humans.人类单侧唇裂腭裂的牙齿缺失模式。
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Jun;58(6):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
3
Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.不同泰国唇腭裂人群的先天缺牙和多生牙的患病率。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3.
4
Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with orofacial clefts.口腔颌面部裂隙患者的牙齿发育不全模式。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Aug;121(4):328-32. doi: 10.1111/eos.12054. Epub 2013 May 4.
5
Tooth agenesis in German orthodontic patients with non-syndromic craniofacial disorder: a retrospective evaluation of panoramic radiographs.德国非综合征性颅面畸形正畸患者的牙齿缺失:全景片的回顾性评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5823-5832. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04538-2. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients.非综合征型口腔裂患者中牙缺失和结构牙异常与裂隙类型相关的流行情况的横断面分析。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0169-x. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
7
Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧完全性唇腭裂及双侧完全性唇腭裂患者的牙发育不全编码(TAC)
Odontology. 2018 Jul;106(3):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0332-3. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis.使用牙齿发育不全编码分析口腔颌面部裂隙中的牙齿发育不全模式:一项荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;10(7):128. doi: 10.3390/dj10070128.
9
Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among patients aged 12-22 years: A retrospective study.12至22岁患者牙齿发育不全的患病率及模式:一项回顾性研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Sep 25;51(5):355-362. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.5.355.
10
Tooth agenesis patterns in bilateral cleft lip and palate.双侧唇腭裂中的牙齿发育不全模式。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Feb;118(1):47-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00698.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.不同泰国唇腭裂人群的先天缺牙和多生牙的患病率。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3.
2
Global Trends and Hotspots in Research on Tooth Agenesis: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis.牙齿发育不全研究的全球趋势与热点:一项20年的文献计量分析
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46961. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Characterization of SHH, SOX3, WNT3A and WNT9B Proteins in Human Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate Tissue.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic models and approaches to study orofacial clefts.研究口腔颌面部裂隙的遗传模型和方法。
Oral Dis. 2022 Jul;28(5):1327-1338. doi: 10.1111/odi.14109. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate: An Executive Summary.唇、牙槽突及腭裂患者治疗临床实践指南:执行摘要
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 20;10(21):4813. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214813.
3
Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
人非综合征性唇腭裂组织中SHH、SOX3、WNT3A和WNT9B蛋白的特征分析
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;11(6):151. doi: 10.3390/dj11060151.
4
Novel Candidate Genes for Non-Syndromic Tooth Agenesis Identified Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.使用靶向新一代测序技术鉴定非综合征性牙齿发育不全的新型候选基因。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 15;11(20):6089. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206089.
5
Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis.使用牙齿发育不全编码分析口腔颌面部裂隙中的牙齿发育不全模式:一项荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;10(7):128. doi: 10.3390/dj10070128.
全球唇腭裂患病率:一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;123(2):110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Gene-environment interactions: aligning birth defects research with complex etiology.基因-环境相互作用:使出生缺陷研究与复杂病因学保持一致。
Development. 2020 Jul 17;147(21):dev191064. doi: 10.1242/dev.191064.
5
Genetic analysis: Wnt and other pathways in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis.遗传分析:非综合征性牙齿缺失中的 Wnt 及其他通路。
Oral Dis. 2019 Apr;25(3):646-651. doi: 10.1111/odi.12931. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
Whole exome sequencing identifies mutations in 10% of patients with familial non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate in genes mutated in well-known syndromes.全外显子组测序在已知综合征中发生突变的基因中发现了 10%的家族性非综合征性唇裂和/或腭裂患者的突变。
J Med Genet. 2018 Jul;55(7):449-458. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105110. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧完全性唇腭裂及双侧完全性唇腭裂患者的牙发育不全编码(TAC)
Odontology. 2018 Jul;106(3):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0332-3. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Small-molecule Wnt agonists correct cleft palates in mutant mice .小分子Wnt激动剂可纠正突变小鼠的腭裂。
Development. 2017 Oct 15;144(20):3819-3828. doi: 10.1242/dev.157750. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients.非综合征型口腔裂患者中牙缺失和结构牙异常与裂隙类型相关的流行情况的横断面分析。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0169-x. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
10
Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study.牙齿异常:在大量非正畸受试者样本中的患病率及其之间的关联,一项横断面研究
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0352-y.