Department of Chronic Care Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan.
Department of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7.
Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.
This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.
This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.
Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.
社会环境可能会广泛影响多方面的虚弱;然而,环境差异如何影响患有糖尿病的老年人的虚弱程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查城市和农村地区老年糖尿病患者的虚弱程度的区域差异。
这是一项作为老年糖尿病患者衰弱预防计划研究的一部分的横断面研究。连续纳入年龄在 60-80 岁、能够独立完成基本日常生活活动(ADL)的老年人。经过培训的护士获取患者背景、并发症、体重、身体成分、血液检查、握力、虚弱评估和自我护理评分结果。使用逻辑回归和多元线性回归分析评估虚弱的区域差异。
本研究纳入了 417 名参与者(269 名城市居民和 148 名农村居民)。农村地区的健壮率明显低于城市地区(29.7%比 43.9%,p=0.018)。居住在农村地区与虚弱(比值比[OR]2.55,95%置信区间[CI]1.38-4.71)和衰弱前期(OR 2.10,95%CI 1.30-3.41)相关。农村居民的工具性 ADL(B 0.28,标准误[SE]0.073)和社会 ADL(B 0.265,SE 0.097)较低。
观察到了虚弱的区域差异。由于工具性和社会 ADL 的下降,居住在农村地区的老年糖尿病患者有更高的虚弱风险。对社会环境的评估和干预计划,包括沟通策略,以实现跨环境的护理和社会参与,对于虚弱的有效和早期预防至关重要。