Fakkel Matthijs, Peeters Margot, Branje Susan, Stevens Gonneke W J M
Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Youth & Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Adolesc. 2024 Dec;96(8):1884-1900. doi: 10.1002/jad.12389. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
Exposure to family risk factors increases adolescents' chances of attaining a lower educational level. However, some adolescents attain a high educational level despite being exposed to family risk factors such as a lower parental socioeconomic status (SES) or receiving less family support.
Using data from the Dutch TRAILS cohort study (N = 2175; M = 11.1, SD = 0.55, 50.8% female), we investigated if higher levels of effortful control and peer support can buffer against the negative effects of a lower parental SES and less family support on educational level. Two multinomial logistic regressions were performed (from early to mid-adolescence and from mid-adolescence to young adulthood) with post hoc tests to contrast four ordinal educational levels: practical vocational, theoretical vocational, higher general, and (pre-)university.
Adolescents with a higher parental SES were consistently more likely to end up at a higher educational level, but family support was hardly associated with educational level. Neither effortful control nor peer support buffered the associations of parental SES and family support with educational level. Effortful control did have a positive direct (compensatory) effect on the educational level.
We conclude that other individual competencies or more structural changes may be more helpful buffers for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in educational attainment.
接触家庭风险因素会增加青少年获得较低教育水平的几率。然而,一些青少年尽管接触到家庭风险因素,如父母社会经济地位(SES)较低或获得的家庭支持较少,但仍能获得较高的教育水平。
利用荷兰TRAILS队列研究的数据(N = 2175;M = 11.1,标准差 = 0.55,50.8%为女性),我们调查了较高水平的努力控制和同伴支持是否能缓冲父母SES较低和家庭支持较少对教育水平的负面影响。进行了两次多项逻辑回归分析(从青少年早期到中期以及从中期到青年期),并进行了事后检验,以对比四个有序的教育水平:实用职业教育、理论职业教育、高等普通教育和(预)大学教育。
父母SES较高的青少年始终更有可能最终获得较高的教育水平,但家庭支持与教育水平几乎没有关联。努力控制和同伴支持都没有缓冲父母SES和家庭支持与教育水平之间的关联。努力控制确实对教育水平有积极的直接(补偿性)影响。
我们得出结论,其他个人能力或更多结构性变化可能是减少教育成就方面社会经济不平等的更有效缓冲因素。