Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
作者信息
Shin Jae-Won, Park Yung, Kim Sang-Ho, Choi Sung-Ryul, Ha Joong-Won, Kim Hak Sun, Suk Kyung-Soo, Moon Sung-Hwan, Park Si-Young, Lee Byung-Ho, Kwon Ji-Won, Choi Hee-Min
机构信息
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
出版信息
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1457-1458. doi: 10.1177/21925682241266210. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后相邻节段病变的长期发生率
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1457-1458. doi: 10.1177/21925682241266210. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术：矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
3
Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后相邻节段病变的长期发生率
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1635-1643. doi: 10.1177/21925682241254800. Epub 2024 May 13.
4
Letter re: Letter to the Editor Concerning 'Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Minimally Invasive vs. Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion'.关于《微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后相邻节段病变的长期发生率》致编辑的信的回复信。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1459. doi: 10.1177/21925682241266229. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].[微创经椎间孔与传统开放后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的矢状位脊柱-骨盆参数有效性及变化比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;29(12):1504-9.
6
Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.微创与开放单节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的长期临床疗效：一项荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2049-2065. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?椎间笼前凸是否会影响微创腰椎融合术中实际获得的节段前凸？
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E17. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20393.
8
Indirect Effects on Adjacent Segments After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后对相邻节段的间接影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e717-e725. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.087. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].[经旁正中切口微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;29(10):1253-8.
10
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
本文引用的文献
1
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.I级腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术：来自前瞻性多中心质量结果数据库登记处的5年随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602.
2
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.腰椎终板的几何和材料特性对腰椎椎间融合失败的影响：系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.
3
Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.单节段腰椎滑脱症患者微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 10 年疗效比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):773-780. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004334. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages.使用单侧与双侧椎间融合器进行经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效
Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):854-862. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142248.124. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
5
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.1 级退变性腰椎滑脱症微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较：前瞻性质量结果数据库分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):555-562. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa097.
6
Terminology.术语。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S8-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d62ed.
7
Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和退行性节段性不稳定的手术疗效
Asian Spine J. 2011 Dec;5(4):228-36. doi: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.4.228. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.腰椎相邻节段退变
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1497-503. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00020.
Zotero 插件